3/16/2012 6:49 PM ET|
Do car insurers overcharge the poor?
A recent report says insurance companies use such factors as ZIP codes and education levels to charge low-income drivers more for policies.
A Consumer Federation of America report released earlier this year accuses auto insurance companies of unfairly penalizing low-income drivers.
By law, insurers aren't allowed to ask about income. The CFA report says insurers are using a number of other factors -- such as ZIP codes and education levels -- as proxies for income, and charging poor drivers much more as a result.
The report drew a sharp response from the auto insurance industry.
"As anyone who watches television commercials knows, auto insurance coverage is widely available in every U.S. state," says Robert Hartwig, the president of the Insurance Information Institute. "Drivers should shop around if they feel as though their current auto insurer is not meeting their needs, or charging too high a price."
In fact, the CFA analysis comes right on the heels of a report from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners trumpeting another year of decline in overall auto insurance expenditures.
So is insurance getting cheaper or more expensive?
The company you keep
Our gilded age of computing offers companies the ability to slice and dice data to predict behaviors.
Amazon.com uses it to show you music you might like, and car insurers use it to set your rates. If drivers like you -- sharing your occupation, ZIP code, credit history or dozens of other rating factors -- file more claims, you will pay more for car insurance.
Assuming you live in the right ZIP code and fall into the right buckets, you're probably paying less than someone who doesn't. (We strongly suggest everyone shop around, of course.)
The wide-ranging CFA report cites as an example a single man with a spotless record, age 30, driving a Ford Taurus 20 miles each way to work. With an M.B.A. and an address in an affluent St. Louis suburb, his rate was $558 a year. The CFA then changed his rating profile, with the following results:
- Less education, a $71 increase
- Unemployment, an $84 increase
- Moving to an urban ZIP code, a $347 increase
- A gap in coverage, a $638 increase
- Installment payments, $60
None of those factors means the Taurus owner is a worse driver.
Where the money is
Every insurance company sets its own rates, deciding how much each factor raises the risk of a claim being filed. But by law, each insurer must apply that rating formula to every driver equally within that state. For example, insurers can't levy a surcharge for speeding tickets on drivers in some ZIP codes but not in others.
The nonprofit CFA says insurance companies get around the rules by charging more for rating factors and coverages likely to be shared by low-income drivers. Their analysis found some insurers charged more for bare-minimum policies than for those with more coverage. In some cases, insurers grossly overpriced coverage for drivers carrying minimum levels of coverage by many thousands of dollars, the CFA says. In states where credit is a legally allowed rating factor, drivers with poor credit histories pay as much as 25% more, the CFA says.
Insurers argue that factors such as occupation and credit clearly are correlated to the risk of a claim. The CFA says that kind of thinking leaves good drivers unfairly paying rates they don't deserve and can't afford.
"It is difficult to avoid the conclusion," the CFA report says, "that major insurers are far more interested in selling auto insurance to higher-income families."
Is pay-per-mile the answer?
The CFA suggests several possible remedies:
- Lowered mandatory liability limits in some states
- More state-run insurance programs for drivers below an income threshold
- More aggressive examination of rating factors by state regulators, who must approve each company's formula for calculating rates
- Development of pay-per-mile programs
Every state except New Hampshire requires some minimum level of liability coverage, but those levels change from state to state. Even that limited coverage can be very expensive. A CarInsurance.com survey of bare-minimum rates found annual premiums ranging from $342 in Wisconsin to $1,422 in Washington, D.C. About 14% of drivers go without any coverage at all, according to the Insurance Research Council.
The CFA points out that technology developed to provide usage-based insurance -- that is, insurance rates based on the driver's recorded mileage and driving habits, pioneered by companies such as Progressive and State Farm -- could serve equally well in implementing pay-per-mile systems. Low-income families drive only about half as many miles as those in the highest brackets, the CFA notes.
More from CarInsurance.com
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
of course they do... they also push just Liability only... when for a little more you can get full coverage....in most cases. They say that Older cars don't need full coverage....Yes they do ...if you don't have 2 or 3000k to replace it ....if you wreck it,. storm damage or hit an run.
Sure they do! Them and Sears Roebuck & Co. Don't ever get their credit card. They charge the highest APR of any credit card company.
I don't see anywhere in this article where it mentions linking insurance costs to credit rating, but many auto insurers do this. I have heard the argument that people with low credit ratings file more auto claims, but there is no solid proof for this link. I have been at both ends of the credit rating spectrum and I'd just like to say that my ability to drive responsibly has never been affected by my being in either category.
Another news story to hate the rich/corps whatever the dems want to divide and hate. Still waiting for the gov. waste exposed so we don't need to raise anybodies taxes story ! YUP, still waiting ! But why would they do that if they want the government to control and save everything. When can we get stories to hate the gov. for waste ?
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Children from lower income families are at greater risk of suffering accidental injuries and being sickened by food, according to a Consumer Federation of America study.