The distortions created by the misguided policies of central bankers have inverted the investing world and hurt the precious metals. But investors will wake up.
I realize I run the risk of sounding like a broken record every week when I discuss precious metals, but given how important they are as a vehicle for protecting one's wealth in today's insane money-printing environment, it would be hypocritical, if not irresponsible, for me to pay attention to less important topics.
What's more, given the action in the metals sector last week and the current sentiment, we may be seeing the beginning of a turn higher, following the recent rejection of lower prices.
Granted, to feel like any real turn is at hand we would need to see aggressively higher prices pretty soon.
Given that so many people have positioned themselves (both psychologically and financially) for gold to decline, we easily could get that jolt higher.
Consider it a hostile takeover
I have been involved in the investment business for more than three decades, and I don't believe I have ever seen an asset market (I'm speaking of the metals themselves, not the miners) become so hated when so little has changed and price damage has been so minor.
As the Dow reaches a meaningless milestone that's divorced from fundamental economic strength, the Fed's money-printing continues to force investors into risk assets.
Thus, there were plenty of stories as to why the market has behaved as it has, but there really was no proximate cause for why it reached record highs this week.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) hitting a new high has created excitement and a certain amount of pressure on investors to join the party, which has created a bit of a feeding frenzy.
It is difficult for people to accept that markets do inexplicable things all the time, and that it is often just the collective twitching of hundreds of millions of participants.
However, we do know the real reason markets are levitating, and that is because the world's central bankers are printing money in a fashion never before seen or even contemplated. When all of that money meets a little bit of positive psychology, markets can go anywhere.
They just need a little time to unwind
Of course, when you have stocks that have been buoyed by easy money and excited crowd behavior, they can also get smashed rather easily at some point, particularly when you have computers operating as they do, although none of that means the market will decline immediately, let alone when those of us who believe it is dangerous think it ought to. (The same was true during the housing bubble.)
While most eyes are focused on Italy, France may be the bellwether for Europe's prospects, with implications for our own economic future.
It's been a while since I have relayed much from my anonymous friend, whom I refer to as the Lord of the Dark Matter, but given the uptick in European angst, I thought I ought to.
First off, he noted that now that the rally inspired by European Central Bank President Mario Draghi's outright monetary transactions has been exhausted, it's time to pay closer attention to its effect on Europe.
(I say "inspired" because Draghi did not have to actually do much in the way of open market transactions, but he will in the not-too-distant future, I would guess.)
As for the LODM's views, he suggested that, "While the markets are, understandably, volatile after the Italian election, and I thought about writing about the outcome . . . do not let Italy distract you from the real and growing problem in Europe. Which is France."
If it all weren't so absurdly familiar, the money-printing-fueled rally in stocks underwritten by faith the Fed will fix the economy would be unbelievable. And yet many doubt more-tangible assets.
As precious metals were pummeled again this week, all sentiment measures that I look at hit their lowest levels this decade. One indicator, the Daily Sentiment Index, hit a level seen only twice before, and not at all since 1993.
I, for one, don't really see how the mood for the metals and miners could get much worse, but that does not mean it has to turn around immediately. The mood will change when it changes, but when it does, it will precipitate big moves.
Part of the reason folks don't think they need precious metals is the belief in the Goldilocks thesis, which has at its root the notion that the economy is getting stronger. An extension of that is the suggestion -- once again -- that the Federal Reserve is going to cease its money printing early and thus head off inflation.
On Wednesday, we saw more angst along those lines, as the tape was all a-jitter over fears that the Federal Open Market Committee minutes were going to show some sort of a tremendously hawkish bent on the part of the monetary doves that run the Fed. The news that some Fed heads might want to "vary" the pace of quantitative easing is reminiscent of last year (see below), when some were incorrectly musing about actual Fed exit strategies.
The global economy is suffering from a third massive misallocation of capital. And when each stage means a larger and larger distortion of our financial system, the third time is definitely not the charm.
Early last week there was some chatter regarding the upcoming G-20 meeting that tried to play down the idea that the G-7 countries -- the biggest of the industrialized nations -- are engaged in a competition to see who can debase their currency the fastest. Of course, such chatter is meaningless, because even if those countries were in a currency war, they wouldn't acknowledge it.
More important, what is under way is bigger than squabbling over who can make the most confetti. We are in the midst (or, more likely, somewhat past that point) of the third massive misallocation of capital of the past 15 to 20 years, all three of which have been precipitated by irresponsible central bank activity.
Anyone hear an echo?
The first instance was mostly a Federal Reserve-inspired party/debacle (the equity bubble) that allowed people to live beyond their means, dream that they could be day traders or start up spurious businesses they believed would one day be worth billions of dollars.
The most recent Barron's Roundtable shows that while the market is celebrating, smart money folks who've been right about past busts see the next breakdown dead ahead.
The world's equity markets continued their money-printing-inspired party over the last few days and, in conjunction, a certain amount of recklessness continues to build. However, there is reason to suspect, courtesy of Barron's, that the rally may be about to end.
(I normally don't buy Barron's, but I did this week because I wanted to read the Roundtable comments from Fred Hickey, publisher of The High-Tech Strategist, and Bill Gross, founder and co-chief investment officer of Pimco).
On the cover of the Feb. 4 issue, the headline read, "Stock alert! Get ready for a record on the Dow," followed by a lead paragraph that modestly reminded us, "We told you so. In October, we predicted the Dow would pass its 14,165 record by early this year. Now we are just 1% short. Expect a breakthrough soon."
I don't recall ever seeing such brazen end-zone dancing by a major financial publication, and if history is any guide, this means the stock market rally is essentially over.
The stock market's strong start to the year tells us more about the investing crowd's need to believe that all the big problems are behind us than it does about the potential for a strong economy.
As the collective worldwide equity rally soldiers on, folks across the board once again have suspended disbelief to conclude that all problems are solved (or at least contained).
Whether it's Japan's deflation (which folks believe will be conquered by the money printing there), to the mess in Europe, to America's economic, financial and monetary woes, everything is deemed to be on the mend. Thus, money is being thrown at stocks, and the year has certainly gotten off to quite the start, with the major indices all running off notable strings of up days.
It probably won't be long before Bubblevision (aka CNBC) gets all lathered up about the "just right" Goldilocks economy yet again, as it has during every period in the past 15 years when money printing warped markets and the economy. (More about that later).
Why so many put so much trust in our central bank's central planners is a mystery, given how out of touch they seem to be. So don't be lured in because it seems like everything is under control.
A New York Times article caught my eye, since it described a subject near and dear to my heart, namely, the lack of omniscience at the Federal Reserve.
Headlined "Days before housing bust, Fed doubted need to act," the Jan. 18 article by Binyamin Appelbaum walked through how the Fed responded to the early part of the housing bust, beginning with what the Fed was thinking in August 2007. It makes it quite clear that the geniuses in charge of our monetary policy were completely unaware of the fact that the housing bubble had been the economy, among other important issues.
What we knew they didn't know then
That is naturally par for the course, since Fed "logic" always starts from a false premise, that being that bad things in the economy just "happen" and it is the Fed's job to fix them, rather than understanding that it is the Fed that keeps precipitating our problems through its money printing.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT BILL FLECKENSTEIN
This column is a synopsis of Bill Fleckenstein's daily column on his website, FleckensteinCapital.com, which he's been writing on the Internet since 1996. Click here to find Fleckenstein's most recent articles.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended the midweek session with slim gains after showing some intraday volatility in reaction to the release of the latest policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 added 0.1%, while the relative strength among small caps sent the Russell 2000 higher by 0.3%.
Equities spent the first half of the session near their flat lines as participants stuck to the sidelines ahead of the FOMC statement, which conveyed no changes to the ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
As the devil-may-care bravado of Wall Street marches on, history warns that -- in the end -- there will be the devil to pay.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'