Europe is in the easy money now
The Continent's chief banker offers a quixotic solution to its debt problems. Can he really pull it off?
For the past month, and perhaps two, folks have been anticipating Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's speech at Jackson Hole, Wyo. (which he delivered a week ago), the Sept. 6 meeting of the European Central Bank, the German Constitutional Court ruling on Sept. 12 -- the next big data point -- and then the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on Sept. 13.
My view has been that we would get money printing from the Fed and that ECB President Mario Draghi would morph into Bernanke and come up with his own easy-money policy (as I discussed last week).
Though it is not knowable when those outcomes will become clear to all, Bernanke's speech heavily telegraphed a third round of money printing (aka QE3). And, thanks to Thursday's ECB announcement, we know that Draghi is committed to unlimited bond purchases. Of course -- wink, wink -- he is claiming those purchases will be sterilized, but that is an impossibility.
Just call him Mr. Clean
For anyone who doesn't know, sterilization means that for every euro's worth of bonds that the ECB buys, it immediately sells an offsetting amount to avoid expanding the money supply. Usually the central bank does that by buying a maturity of one length and selling one whose maturity is similar or shorter. Thus, there is no net change in the amount of money (in theory), but a maturity (or credit) that is unpopular gets a little help on the demand side, while a more popular one gets more supply.
Bernanke also used to talk about a theoretical form of sterilization when he discussed the Fed's exit strategy, although that approach to sterilization is one that is more "legged into" -- i.e., buy now, sell in the future. At this point, however, the Fed makes no pretense about an exit strategy.
As an aside, for some time when Fed heads talked about these policies, they claimed what they were doing wasn't really printing money, because they were eventually going to sell. (Right.) At this point, of course, that pretext has been totally dropped, and the idea of an exit is something for a debate in 2015 or 2016.
What's more, the Fed would have you believe that it will have no problems executing its exit, which is silly. No single entity (nor any group) has enough capital to buy all the bonds the Fed won't be buying when QE ends, on top of all the bonds the Fed would need to sell.
He might be taking that supply curve a little fast
I bring all this up because, as noted, Draghi claims he is going to sterilize his purchases.
Well, if you're buying the debt of Spain, Italy and potentially France (not to mention Portugal or Greece), there is a lot more problem debt to buy than there is debt you would be able to sell, such as Germany's or Sweden's, or the bonds of some other, more fiscally prudent country. And you obviously can't be selling the same government's debt you are buying and expect to provide any relief.
That means it simply can't happen. Obviously, when you contemplate unlimited purchases, you need to realize that it is literally impossible for you to sell an unlimited quantity. It doesn't even work in theory, and in practice it really won't work.
Nonetheless, the ECB can easily pretend it is going to sterilize its purchases, and it may actually do it to some degree for a little while, though I have no idea whether the ECB has even crafted the wording for how it plans to execute its sterilization. Perhaps it will come down to "just trust us."
But if you take a step back and look at how far its leaders have come, and how many rules it has changed, it is quite clear that if push comes to shove and the selling part of the sterilization isn't possible, Draghi will just say, "Forget about it; we'll do it later." Or he will invent some wiggle room, claiming that the transmission of monetary policy in certain countries has been impacted, just as the ECB has used that rationale to allow it to do what it is doing now.
It is ironic to note that if the debt of the PIIGS nations (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) starts trading better, and German debt trades worse, reversing that would require the Germans to acquiesce on the very money printing they are trying to avoid.
In any case, for the world to finally stop worrying about a deflationary accident in Europe, we need to see the German court deem the European Stability Mechanism constitutional on Sept. 12, and for the Fed heads to actually launch QE3. I think both of those things will occur. Thus, we will continue to find ourselves in a world where every major country and currency bloc is printing like mad.
In sum, the world will be awash in an even bigger sea of confetti, one so large that perhaps opinions about the desirability of paper money may change.
The idea seemed fine, on paper
In that environment, stock prices can go haywire, and inflation will most certainly ratchet up, though we don't know how long it will be before inflationary psychology changes and the bond market disciplines central bankers with declining prices.
In the old days, if a country pursued these strategies, it would see its currency collapse versus others. But it is hard to have a currency crackup when all of the major currencies (the Swiss franc, the euro, the yen, the pound and the dollar) are being debased in massive quantities. Thus, the only way to protect oneself is to own something that can't be debased -- such as gold, silver or some other rare asset.
I believe I have accurately described the state of the monetary world, and I feel strongly that the deflation fear trade is yesterday's story, though it may still play out for a while. Since we can't know when bond markets will sober up, it is too early to short bonds -- or stocks, for that matter -- but that time will come. Meanwhile, folks need to have protection from the world's central bankers in the form of hard assets.
At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein owned gold.
Don't have kids bottom line I have 1 and my poor grandchildren keep printing money. My advice rack up as much debt as you can get all those credit card offers when you go broke borrowing the goverment will take the tab aka "bankrupt". So why not pile it on after all they can always print more money. Remember the Weimar republic had thair day so we will have ours well.. our children. My last question is where is this money going? We have digital remember so they can add the money before they even print it Europe is printing money China and Usa of course the markets will boom but where the heck is all this stuff going were talking trillions globally?
Here's some disturbing data. If you subtract out excess government spending from GDP, growth for 2009 to 2012 has been:
So we're really still in a deep recession, and the only think keeping the official GDP numbers above zero is the deficit. :P
The ECB problem is that its going to have to sell all its bonds from strong countries--Germany, Finland, etc.--and load up its balance sheet with weak countries bonds, which can devalue quickly. Especially since the ECB says it will forego its prior requirement that any bonds it buys become "senior". So the ECB balance sheet is at risk here, after the honeymoon is over for this action, when Spanish and Italian bonds start to go downhill again. That means the Euro will devalue, even if the action is "sterilized".
Of course, this may never happen, despite what Draghi says, because this is basically screwing the German and Finnish economies to pump up the PIIGS. And one wonders how much the German voters will let themselves be screwed, especially when there is no real reform in the PIIGS (except for Ireland, perhaps).
As told by Andrew Dickson White (youngest professor ever at U of MI, Founder of Cornell University) in his book: Fiat Money Inflation in France (about the French Revolution)... Inflationists kept printing more fiat currency that never trickled into the economy until it was using new fiat to compensate for prior fiat currency obligations or, phony money on top of funny money. Notably, the identical no-pulse economy on Main Street. Europe is literally reliving the French Revolutionary period! We are here, as well. With no job recovery and a waning interest in tangibly produced indigenous products, most nations of the world are counting the days to monetary stalemate. China actually has not made anything for what... two years now, if we examine coal surpluses and other indicators there. So, most economies are living off excess supply without ANY revival of fundamental industry or local commerce. If America doesn't wake up really soon, it will run out of clothing sooner than the 15 years it would take to rebuild textile to retail industries.
Wealth during these times is pure crime. Close the banks. End the Fed. Get rid of Wall Street. If we aren't 100% invested in job recovery and fundamental manufacturing of essentials, we won't outrun the crash. We don't eat paper, so why are why paying paper pushers instead of founding industry?
The stale regurgitated rhetoric warning us to BEWARE of the dreaded Bush economics that got us into this problem is nothing more then mindless solders of the left with no ideas. The details sound something like the tax cuts and wars created this problem. If the tax cuts were such a bad economic idea then why do they want to continue 99% of them. It’s hypocritical at best. Then it’s the un-funded wars that caused our demise. For on thing we were attacked, and second spending on defense creates jobs. Then it’s that those horrible Wall Street capitalists that prayed on the unprotected and vulnerable. The financial mess was equally contributed to by controlling political parties through out the world and was hardly isolated as some desperate political pundits may claim. What causes job loss is impeding business to grow due to regulation, environmental roadblocks and a lack of demand. Dont let anyone convince you otherwise. If you want a job vote republican.
Where do you live? I live directly across the border from Canada. Everyday, there is gridlock on all the border crossings. Canadians come to America for basics. They pay too much for gas, food, toilet paper, milk AND if they don't spend enough when they buy stuff in Canada, there is a tax for that. You know why YOU don't know that? Because in Canada they don't have a democratic government fighting for our Rights and Freedom. They have 9 families that dictate to government there and puppets to do what they need done. I loved going to Canada... when America was free and I didn't need a passport to talk to my neighbor.
Mark Twain has described a mine as "a hole in the ground owned by a liar."
If or when gold reaches 2000.00 dollars a troy ounce. I am going all cash. Getting out of the stock market until the Dow Jones Industrial Average goes well below 10,000. Is this a good or bad idea?
I have a feeling that the great depression is starting to happen all over again. Never thought I would see it in my lifetime. My father always warned me it could happen again. My father always told me to save my money. Don't you hate when your father is right. He never said to invest in gold. He would always tell me to buy land. Maybe when I am out of the stock market, that is what I might just do.
My father was like Mark Twain in some ways. He would always say "Never get married to a girl until you took her swimming."
I don't think the author understands the way bonds are traded. It IS possible to trade "unlimited" quantities as there will always be investors, banks, etc willing make a purchase for the right price. All this means is that rates are pushed lower for long term / "riskier" bonds at the cost of higher rates on short term / "safer" bonds. So yes, Germany will be at the short end of the stick. But all the "it simply can't happen" talk is bunk.
"Meanwhile, folks need to have protection from the world's central bankers in the form of hard assets."
Obviously Mr. Fleckenstein wants you to contribute to the rising price of his gold investments.
"As usual, you have it all backwards. The fact that government spending is currently carrying GDP on it's shoulders tells me we've regressed into a partially socialist nation. If you want to see a good example of what happens to countries that turn socialist, take a look at Greece."
Greece- formerly free until coaxed into joining the EUC. Once in, sees it's domestic hallmark products duplicated in China and the USA. Loses the majority of businesses that employed workforce. Sees influx of paper pushing that rises to dominance. The people protest because they are steadily pushed in suppression and submission. Suddenly, the Greek government says... oops, we borrowed more than we can pay back so let's borrow more, shattering the remaining fragile economy. People there riot and burn down banks who could not account for deposits or actions. Government is given to ex-Central banker who borrows them further in debt, raises his own pay. Is ousted by an election. Since the election, the EUC has made threats but does zero about job recovery. Meanwhile the people revive the Drachma to provide currency on Main Street.
WHERE is the Socialism in that? I'd call it a desperate attempt to restore FREEDOM paired with a basic survival move that works. Globalization is Socialism or worse-- lifetime servitude to the fat master bankers and bloated inheritors of old money- worldwide.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT BILL FLECKENSTEIN
This column is a synopsis of Bill Fleckenstein's daily column on his website, FleckensteinCapital.com, which he's been writing on the Internet since 1996. Click here to find Fleckenstein's most recent articles.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Tuesday session on a lower note after generally upbeat earnings took the back seat to geopolitical concerns. The S&P 500 (-0.5%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.1%) ended on their lows, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) displayed relative strength.
Once again, market participants were focused on quarterly reports in the early going, but geopolitical worries overshadowed the impact of mostly better than expected earnings. Specifically, equities ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
As the devil-may-care bravado of Wall Street marches on, history warns that -- in the end -- there will be the devil to pay.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'