Updated: 9/24/2010 9:00 AM ET|
Could you be fired for bad credit?
In some cases, the answer might be yes. Or you might simply not be offered a job and never know why. If you find that troubling, here's what you can do.
Credit background checks have become routine among employers, even as soaring unemployment and foreclosures have resulted in black marks on millions of people's credit histories.
Credit checks are required for federal jobs with security clearances, but six out of 10 private employers check the credit histories of at least some of their job applicants, according to a recent survey by the Society for Human Resource Management.
Companies do so primarily to prevent or reduce crime, such as theft and embezzlement, the survey indicated. The idea is that people who have debt problems are more likely to steal or commit other crimes.
Overused and abused
I've been reluctant to weigh in against employers using credit checks, assuming companies would use some common sense. The human-resources survey disabused me of that notion. Consider:
- Thirteen percent of employers use credit checks for all their employees, including those who don't handle money, have any fiduciary or financial responsibilities, or even access to sensitive information. There's no evidence credit checks are effective in preventing crime even in financially sensitive positions, so how can we justify them for anyone else?
- Twenty-five percent acknowledged that a bankruptcy on an applicant's credit report would most likely result in a decision not to make a job offer. Here's the problem: Using a bankruptcy as a decision not to hire (or to fire or to refuse a promotion) is illegal under federal law.
- A majority (65%) allow applicants to explain credit-check results before the final hiring decision is made. But 22% allow applicants to explain only after a decision is made, and 13% don't allow any explanation. Even if employers are convinced that credit checks prevent crime, why wouldn't they want to know if an applicant was the victim of identity theft or ran up debt for a life-saving operation for their child?
If companies aren't willing to use a little common sense on their own, maybe some needs to be imposed on them.
No evidence supports use
There's no hard evidence that links bad credit and bad morals.
"At this point we don't have any research to show any statistical correlation between what's in somebody's credit report and their job performance or their likelihood to commit fraud," Eric Rosenberg, the state government liaison for TransUnion credit bureau, conceded in testimony to Oregon legislators.
Rosenberg was actually arguing against a state bill that would limit employers' ability to use credit checks. TransUnion and other credit bureaus that provide the reports say they're an important tool for evaluating applicants.
The arguments didn't sway the Oregon Legislature, which recently passed a law prohibiting credit checks for hiring, firing, promoting or determining compensation for most workers. Exceptions were made for financial institutions, public-safety offices and other employment if credit history is important to a job and a background check is disclosed to the applicant or employee.
Washington state and Hawaii already have curbed widespread use of credit checks in making hiring decisions. Other states are considering similar laws, and U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., has sponsored a bill that would ban employment-related credit checks nationwide except when the job:
- Required a national-security or Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. clearance.
- Was with a state or local government agency that otherwise required the use of a consumer report.
- Was in a supervisory, managerial, professional or executive position at a financial institution.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Things like this will keep damaging the economy and peoples livelihood. Gosh forbid that people have hard times in their lives these days. If companies keep placing such a big emphasis on credit scores and not the person themselves, they themselves will be this countries down fall. Spending will be reduced. Also, the next generation will not want any credit cards (which maybe a great thing), live with their parents longer and/or save up until they can pay for everything they want outright, because they see how their parents are struggling or hear about the credit score requirements.
Yes, the Tex Governor Perry solution to all this is Death Penalty no matter what the poor people do, to cut down Medicaid and well fare to those who have no job/skill/education (except the 100 Mexican children(politics right now)), and at the same time Tex has the lowest corporate med ins coverage in the entire country!--then the reason people get disenchanted and steal to survive if they have a medical problem, so instead of coverage and jobs for regular people, let us hire 10,000 more (gov paid) "heroes" to chase, shoot and kill them!
--And he is working to cut down on time of conviction to death, by ignoring and prohibiting/blocking any independent death penalty check up.
yes Tex has a low unemployment rate due to the fact so many companies pay no med ins, or benefits, and a lot of min Fed wage/hour rate.
Death to the people who are not part of the inside, like other 3rd world countries--but the companies here have become part of the racket!
So" freedom" here (for companies) is really the same or closer to death for people!
Speaking about credit, no one on min wage, need to apply, since they have no credit rating, and that is over 50 million families--please get in the real know here!
Eight possible other reasons for the use of Credit Scores as to job applicants:
One is that it is a way to work around various anti-discrimination laws particularly as to race & ethnic background.
Second is a way to keep out those with or formally had drug, gambling or other addictive problems. Too often such persons may have financial problems that can affect their potential job perfomance and such information may be impossible to get any other way.
Third is that it is impossible to get real info of an applicant's previous employer as was why terminated or left, which can included financial crimes.
Fourth is that some jobs may require use of company or your own credit cards for business travel or purchases, including car rentals which pretty much require a CC to rent.
Fifth is to possibly fine any minor or major criminal records without the hassles of doing expensive and sometimes inaccurate checks via private investigators or law enforcement agencies.
Sixth, to verify identity, using the Social Security number, getting other personal information as to home address, previous employers, etc.
Seventh, to keep out deadbeats who they may have to process wage liens to debtors.
Eighth, to see if any major health problems, credit reports may include any debts to hospitals, other health care providers.
Since the government itself can fire over a credit check and use's this to revoke security clearness which is mandatory this also leads to removal,somehow I doubt they consider this invasion of privacy and would never make a law against this for obvious reasons. For good or bad you have to live with the errors or like most folks learn to live within your means!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON CREDIT SCORES
Occupy Wall Street bought and forgave the student loan debt of more than 2,700 Everest College students.