12/4/2012 7:45 PM ET|
Boomers carry debts into retirement
Many baby boomers have no plans to pay off big-ticket debt before retirement. That’s hardly a sound financial strategy.
While the G.I. generation (those who fought in World War II) avoided debt and saved the majority of their incomes, today's retiring baby boomers are hardly approaching retirement in the manner of their parents. According to several recent studies and polls, it seems that despite vanishing pensions, low 401k balances and threats to Social Security and other welfare programs, many retiring baby boomers have no desire to give up their current lifestyles.
This new trend of carrying debt into retirement could be the new normal, as poor planning, unforeseen emergencies and a lack of desire to downsize take precedent in boomers' retirement plans.
Credit card, student loans and mortgage debt
Many financial pundits and retirement experts worry that the baby boomers -- better known for spending than for saving -- could face an economic train wreck when it comes to retirement. Many are planning to keep on spending -- even if that means going into debt to maintain their current lifestyles.
According to a new poll commissioned by Canadian bank CIBC, about one-quarter of retiring baby boomers surveyed expect to carry some debt into their retirement. More importantly, roughly 80% of those surveyed indicated that they have no plans to pay off their debt anytime soon and would stay in debt throughout their retirement. While the study focused on Canadian participants, a similar trend is occurring here in the United States.
In generations past, conventional wisdom was to pay off your large debts prior to retirement. That way, retirement savings and portfolios -- mainly consisting of fixed income investments -- would not be encumbered by large payments, such as mortgages, credit cards or student loan debt. However, many U.S. boomers are taking another route.
Using U.S. government data, the Employee Benefit Research Institute in Washington, D.C., found that between 1992 and 2007, the percentage of households with people in their mid-50s and older that were carrying housing and consumer debt rose from 53.8% to 63%. Further, for those aged 55 to 64, nearly 82% were carrying debt. The level of debt was higher, too. According to EBRI, the average overall debt for these 55-and-older households more than doubled (to $70,370) in that period.
While some of this debt could be attributed to rising health care costs, as well as student loan debt held from their children, a growing number of analysts also blame boomer efforts to keep up their lifestyles in retirement. Rising consumer and mortgage debt suggests that boomers believe their retirement incomes will be sufficient to support their desired lifestyles as well as service outstanding debts over the long haul. The idea of boomers letting their heirs deal with the aftermath of their debts is also gaining prevalence.
A smarter strategy
Baby boomers who are entering their golden years with large debts are doing a disservice to their retirement. While it may seem like a good idea to keep the boat and continue paying for it into retirement, the truth is that it’s not. A debt-free start to retirement is a sound strategy.
Retiring with minimal or no debt is one of the most effective ways to make your retirement savings go further. Minimizing or eliminating debt in retirement reduces interest costs and immediately increases cash flow. Likewise, downsizing to a smaller home or apartment is a great way to reduce mortgage costs and utility bills.
The bottom line
Use the years leading up to retirement to your advantage. Paying off debt and boosting contributions to savings will help you continue enjoying your current lifestyle better than paying a creditor each month will. While emergencies do happen, careful planning and saving are still the best ways to stay out of the retirement debt trap.
More from Investopedia.com:
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Some people will never get it. Those who really have money/financial security have no debt.
Carrying debt in any form is never a good idea, why give money to the banks when you can jst save up and pay cash for things. There is a reason bank ceo's make million dollar bonuses.
keep cutting SS on people ... It will continue to get worse ... Before SS was in place, retired folks were the poorest people in our nation ... What do you think will happen if we lose SS? Duh
I sort of disagree with this notion in retirement that some debt payments are better than others. Not totally disagree, but disagree in probably the most important aspect: the dollar to pay mortgage debt is the same green color as the one used to make a car or credit card debt payment. More on the real tax benefits of the perceived mortgage interest deduction below.
For most people, going into retirement from work totally debt free is absolutely the best option. For the simple reason that it reduces the amount of cash flow paid by you to support whatever lifestyle level you want to live. In many parts of the U.S. you can live reasonably comfortably on SS and Medicare maybe supplemented by some sort of pension or income/gains from personal funds with monthly cash income of $3,000 a month for a couple and $2,000 a month for a single person. Now you are not going to live like a king, but you won't struggle either.
Having the roof over your head fully paid for and without major repairs needed, a newer dependable car fully paid for, zero consumer debt is essential. Then all your cash flow can go towards your monthly recurring living expenses which maximizes your standard of living.
Now if you are blessed with substantial retirement income, being debt free is less important. I do disagree with the notion that "having a mortgage is good because of the tax writeoff". For 90% of retiress, that is just not true as the standard deduction often exceeds those expenses that you can itemize such as mortgage interest, taxes, etc., hence you have little to no tax benefit for mortgage interest, or at least less than you think you have if you did a proper analysis.
If you don't intend to work at least part-time, taking any debt into retirement with you (other than maybe a car payment or a mortgage - rent control) can be lethal if you don't have sufficient cash flow to manage it!
Sell the house if you've built up considerable equity, downsize, become debt free, and invest the remainder!
In retirement, paying interest if you can avoid it along with buying lottery tickets are taxes on the stupid!!!
Retired almost 7 years ago @ 54, live modestly except for travel, and haven't looked back since then. Can't wait to start collecting SS when I'm 62!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON DEBT MANAGEMENT
The government's health care portal stumbled badly out of the gate 2 months ago, and it's still far from perfect.