7/9/2012 7:50 PM ET|
Is this all the recovery we get?
Because this recession really was different, the recovery will be, too. Here's a plan for investing in what looks to be a slow, tortuous road back for years to come.
Last week -- on July 5 -- three of the world's central banks moved virtually simultaneously to stimulate the global economy. And financial markets shrugged.
I think that shrug marks an important new stage in the agonizingly slow recovery from the global financial crisis and the Great Recession. It indicates that financial markets agree that central banks are now relatively powerless.
Yes, central bank intervention, especially by the U.S. Federal Reserve, stabilized the global financial system. But the next stages of the recovery are about deleveraging to reduce the huge debt load distributed throughout the global economy, and then about demand creation. (See my related blog post on the markets' collective shrug here.)
Central banks are not well suited to either of those tasks. It's normally up to central governments and fiscal policy to make moves that might accelerate progress at this stage of the recovery. But few governments are in a position to take forceful fiscal action. And in even fewer countries is there political consensus that such action is necessary.
If I'm right, we're headed for more years of a recovery that at times is going to be so painfully slow that it won't feel much different from a recession.
In this column, I'm going to lay out, briefly, my view of where we are, where we're going and what kind of investment strategies might work best in what is likely to be a very tough investing environment for years.
More than a standard recession
As Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart so convincingly argued in their 2009 book "This Time Is Different," this isn't your standard business-cycle recession. Business-cycle recessions come in lots of shapes -- U and V, for example -- and can last for just a few quarters or more than a year. The shortest postwar recession lasted for six months, the longest for 16 months. (For more on the length and shape of recessions, see this page from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve.)
A recession is typically the result of a supply or demand shock (such as a huge surge in oil prices), a drop in confidence that produces a big drop in demand, or overproduction at the peak of the business cycle that produces a temporary excess of supply. And the fixes for the run-of-the-mill recession are, according to the consensus among economists, some combination of fiscal and monetary actions to revive demand and restore confidence. Those actions can include tax breaks, government spending and interest-rate cuts.
Those are exactly what the United States has tried in the aftermath of the global financial crisis (which isn't to say that what we've tried was well-designed or executed).
But, as Rogoff and Reinhart argue, recessions that are the result of financial crises are significantly different from run-of-the-mill business-cycle recessions. For one thing, they last longer. In a typical recession, it takes about a year for the economy to make up lost ground and to return to its long-term growth trend. In a financial-crisis recession, Rogoff and Reinhart's data show, it typically takes more than four years for an economy to regain its pre-crisis per capita income level. And it takes even longer for an economy to resume its long-term pre-crisis growth trend.
Our lagging recovery
Where is the U.S. economy on that timeline? The U.S. gross domestic product peaked at $14.42 trillion in nominal dollars in the second quarter of 2008 and in inflation-adjusted dollars (constant 2005 dollars) at $13.33 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2007. In nominal dollars, which don't correct for inflation, the U.S. economy had regained its second-quarter 2008 peak as of the second quarter of 2010. In inflation-adjusted dollars the economy had recovered the ground lost to the crisis and recession as of the third quarter of 2011.
But because the U.S. population grew during that period, the per capita figures aren't as good. At the end of 2007, constant-dollar per capita GDP stood at $44,125. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, it was only $42,731. Adjusting for inflation and for population growth, the United States hadn't recovered the ground it had lost since the end of 2007.
And with the economy growing at an annual rate of just 1.9% in the first quarter of 2012 and projected to slow from that rate in the second quarter -- results aren't in yet -- the U.S. economy still hasn't rebounded to its pre-crisis rate of growth, either.
As discouraging as those numbers are, the U.S. economy has still managed to rebound more quickly than many other economies in the developed world. The United Kingdom, for example, is officially back in recession, with GDP contracting by 0.4% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and 0.3% in the first quarter of 2012. The optimists among economists are projecting growth for all of 2012 of just 0.4%. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, on the other hand, expects the economy in the United Kingdom to shrink by 0.1% for all of 2012.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Did he really use past tense? What an idiot.
WIth America poised upon an election that could further erode our economy, with the corporate power brokers firmly in control, the world is not stupid enough to believe that corporations will ever return to Middle Cl****sperity, and the ability of our citizens to be able to afford more manufactured products, made anywhere. Corporations claim to have our futures in mind, as they strangle our pay, our healthcare access, our pensions replaced with 401k plans that rise and fall with the stock market.
There can be no stability in the world if the beacon, and example, our nation once was, continues to erode into a third world, broken empire, that cannot repair the infrastructure that is already beginning to crumble. The greed over here is showing up over there. Countries are using austerity measures, removing Middle Class benefits and entitlements, that afforded us all with buying power in the past. Now, removing those programs, will only take us further into the morass!
VOTE THE REGRESSIVES OUT!
2012 wages... A hint... $15 to $20 per hour TO START in the Midwest and higher in many other high cost of living areas in America. If they wait until 2020 to do this, it will be too late!
Republicans lack the political will power to reduce the debt and spending.
By definition Democrats are unable to do anything but spend recklessly.
It will be a long time before America get back on its feet again.
What is wrong with the world? In a word: money. Our own monetary system of exchange now effectively prioritises financial stability and growth over survival and progress. While once a useful tool in earlier times, money has now become incompatible with life itself and creates far more problems than it solves. We can put these problems into four main categories:
1. Inequality and Injustice, 2. Waste and Pollution, 3. Debt and Unemployment, 4. Obstructed Progress.
It's important to recognise that no-one is actually to blame for any of these problems. The system we use to run our society has just grown that way over time. Attributing blame, even where seemingly justified, has no useful purpose and just creates adversity.
Many blame banks, corporations, governments, or the people who work in them, but these are not bad or greedy people. They are just ordinary people reacting to an environment of scarcity - the scarcity of money, that is.
Greed is a basic human response to scarcity. If there is a limited supply of something that you need to live, you instinctively want as much as possible of it, because it's good for survival. If we can eliminate scarcity, we can eliminate greed.
We don't need to do this to ourselves any more.
It is time for us to disentangle the human being from his web of outdated methods and ideologies, and focus on our common purpose of survival, progress and freedom.
We need to free ourselves from our imaginary limits.
All of humanity can benefit from a society that utilizes resources and technology in a more humane matter. A society that breeds collaboration instead of competition. Competition creates winners and losers, It seems we have more losers than winners. For more info on how we can change our society for the better visit The Venus Project and The Free World Charter websites.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 added just over a point, holding its weekly gain at 1.0% while the Nasdaq lost 0.4%.
The major averages began the day on an upbeat note, but relinquished their opening gains during the first 90 minutes of action. The early sentiment was boosted by a better-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report for February (175K versus Briefing.com consensus 163K), but a closer look into the report suggested that ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'