4/25/2011 11:14 AM ET|
Your wedding vs. the royal wedding
The gala event for Prince William and Kate Middleton demands perfection -- and that costs big bucks (or, as the British would say, a lot of pounds).
What's the difference between this week's wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton and everyone else's? Logistics and money.
The affair -- no, make that spectacle -- is rumored to cost as much as 80 million pounds, according to reports in the U.K. press which couldn't be verified. Security alone it is slated at 20 million pounds.
No matter how you measure it, the total costs are likely to dwarf the 4 million to 30 million pounds it reportedly cost to throw the 1981 wedding of William's parents, Prince Charles and Diana Spencer.
American weddings typically cost about $27,000, according to the latest survey from TheKnot.com and WeddingChannel.com. That includes flowers, photography, music and party favors, and on these particular details there is little information available about the royal wedding. In all likelihood, the royal family will spend at least 10 times what the average American pays for such items (see chart below).
However, there are many items the family won't have to pay for at all -- such as renting a reception venue (since Buckingham Palace is at their disposal), or hiring a caterer (since the palace already has a full-time catering and event staff). As A-list celebrities, the royals also may get some nice discounts from wedding vendors.
A once-in-a-generation event
Just as with the wedding of Charles and Diana, the nuptials of William and Kate will be the wedding against which all other weddings for the next two decades will be judged. There is intense media interest in every detail, from the wedding dress to the cakes (there are two) to the brand of hosiery that Middleton will wear. A spokeswoman for Buckingham Palace declined to comment for this article. There is, however, an official wedding site with lots of details and plenty of video and photos to allow the public to share in the preparations.
Of course, the wedding reception will be a monumental undertaking. There are two parties -- a breakfast reception for 600 hosted by the queen and a dinner reception for about 300 hosted by Prince Charles at Buckingham Palace. Many celebrities are expected to be in attendance, as well as some heads of state -- although not President Barack Obama, who wasn't invited because the wedding is not technically a state occasion. Not even the tiniest detail will be left to chance.
"Everything has to work like cogs in a wheel," says Linnyette Richardson-Hall, a high-end wedding planner who is a spokeswoman for the National Association of Catering Executives and a panelist on the Style Network's "Whose Wedding Is This Anyway?" "This is a time when perfection is needed."
The couple's families are footing the bill, a smart public relations move in cash-strapped Britain. Though Middleton's family is wealthy, the event seems to be mostly bankrolled by the royals. Getting the best of everything will not come cheap, but it is likely that some of the vendors associated with the wedding are rendering their services for discounted rates or for free because of the enormous publicity they will receive. That's common practice in the U.S. for celebrity weddings and high-profile events like the Oscars.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Let's be realistic....all who have been married or are about to get married, know that the wedding day is not about you. It's about the parent's. When I got married I would of been content with 20-30 close family and friends. However, our parent's insisted on inviting people we didn't even know; and since they were paying for the whole thing, we went along with it.
So, did anyone stop and think that this couple are basically doing what we have all done for our family?
I wish them well. I hope they have a happy future.
hmm...isn't that about as much as the New York Yankees paid Alex Rodrigues to play baseball...?
people with money spend money...people with less money spend less money, that's just how it is....
The royal family doesn't line their coffers with commoner tax dollars, do they? If they don't, then it's their money to spend however they like. There are far richer families in the world who probably blow more money than them we don't know about, many of them right here in America.
Personally, the "Sweet 16" extravaganzas where rich parents buy their spoiled brat daughters brand new cars and throw huge parties for their spoiled brat friends are worse expenditures of someone's hard earned cash than this this is.
I am not surprised at the comments here. As usual postings from people who do not have a real culture to follow. The royal family are about traditions that have been passed down and followed through many generations. It may seem ridiculous, but this is their way, their culture. It may not be your way, but it is theirs. Americans preach about freedom, however insult any other countries culture by telling them they are ridiculous or backward or wrong on how they live.
If anything is ridiculous it is Americans preaching how others should live, as they are living the MTV dream. Look at your up comming generations, that strive to be all about themselves and keep telling other countries they are wrong for the traditions they have. I have travelled and spent time in many countries. I can tell you America is 1 of the last countries who should be telling others how to live and what to do.
If the Royals spend 80 mil on this affair then that is up to them ( Freedom to do so ). If you don't want to watch this on TV, turn it off( Freedom of choice), stop moaning, and hey I have an idea spend some time with your kids and play a board game with them while it is on( and once again Freedom).
In regards to tax payers of the commonwealth paying for this wedding, commonwealth countries stay in the commonwealth for 1 reason to Royal Family as their figure head, most of them have voted to stay under the commonwealth due to the fact they like the tradition and respect of the Royal Family, and am sure they are more then happy to pay taxes to support this.
Ask yourselves how many millions of your tax paying dollars are spent to entertain your president, and politians on needless rubbish. I am sure you would be surprised at how many homeless people could be fed, clothed and housed on the money your government spends in 1 year. Hypocrytical.
I wish them all the joy and happiness in their journey through life, I hope they will maintain a good balance between public and privacy and may their passion for each other never fade.
Make a beautiful life together, William and Kate :)
The "average" wedding is $27000? Give me a break. My wife and I paid for our own wedding and spent less than $2000 even after the rings and honeymoon. And yes, everybody had food and cake, we had music, the venue was nice, and we didn't have to file bankruptcy to put the shindig on. Sounds like an awfully big bet to be making with the divorce rate what it is, anyway. Weddings aren't supposed to be about pomp and show.
Just saying, the wedding is a once in a generation type thing, we do it every 4 years, Now who's being dumb/wasteful/etc.?
I don't shame them at all - all that money goes to businesses and workers who really need it right now. If they have it to spend, more power to them - it's better than sitting in a bank not doing much.
Now do some research and see how much WE spend on inaugurations every 4 YEARS! Some of them are parties hosted and paid for by a private person but many of them are not. And then there's the security, the clean up afterward, the building of podiums that get used once, and the list is endless. And we do this every 4 stinking years, even if it's a re-election and the same person has been voted in again.
So, let them have their wedding, let it be a wonderful, joyous day for them. And before you start throwing stones at someone else and what they're doing, look in your own backyard at what is going on around you. We spend millions upon millions every four years. This event is far more rarer and it's a lot happier.
Leave them be.
Does anyone have any idea how much money Britain will make from this? The tourism alone from this wedding, its a bit like holding the olympic games, countries spend billions to host them. This may be costing 80 mil " estimated " How much do you think this will boost the economy of their country, how much will it bring in?
I doubt you could put a figure on it.
I honestly believe that any wedding is worth celebrating, but have a little respect for the struggles of the economy world-wide! 80 MILLION is EXTREME for ANYONE! Why not make it a more private event as The Count and Countess of Wessex had, or even that of Charles and Camillia? Why spend that sort of money when Wills is not yet heir to the throne, but second in line? He is not a Head of State, and therefore does not require all of the pomp and circumstance that is being pushed for!
I don't know them personally and most likely never will, but some recognition of what their country and the rest of the world is struggling against would be nice....
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON FAMILY & MONEY
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'