12/22/2011 1:10 PM ET|
Insurer balking? 8 ways to fight back
Sometimes your health insurer doesn't want to pay for a treatment because it thinks it won't help you. Don't give up; several options are available, including an appeal.
Millions of Americans suffer from illnesses that add insult to injury by being virtually uninsurable.
Patients with controversial or poorly understood conditions often can't get coverage, even if they have robust employer plans. Many with diagnoses such as temporomandibular joint disorders or autism are left to pay significant out-of-pocket costs to treat their conditions.
Take TMJ disorders, which typically involve pain around the jaw and difficulty chewing and speaking. Some 35 million Americans, or 12% of the population, suffer from it. For some people, it's mild and intermittent, while others have unrelenting pain that precludes them from eating solid food.
Yet labeling the complex condition TMJ can be the "kiss of death" in terms of getting insurers to cover it and dentists and doctors to see patients, said Terrie Cowley, the president of the TMJ Association, a patient-advocacy group in Milwaukee.
"It's unconscionable this mess we are in," she said.
Sometimes employers and insurers don't want to pay for medical treatments that don't help or, worse, harm people further. By refusing to cover treatments that aren't proved to be effective, health insurers say they can hold down premiums for the broader pool of their members.
But it's not always so straightforward. If you have a diagnosis that insurers don't want to touch, you should investigate your options, health care advocates say.
How to fight back
Here are eight tips to protect yourself.
1. Talk with your doctor or health care provider about your treatment options. Ask whether the ones he or she recommends are supported by scientific evidence, said Dr. John Santa, the director of Consumer Reports' Health Ratings Center in Yonkers, N.Y. Or are the recommended treatments based on the doctor's expert opinion or perhaps something more speculative?
2. Contact nonprofit patient-advocacy and support organizations. These groups can help you determine whether your state has any coverage mandates and give you a sense of their treatment priorities. (Some groups are research-oriented and don't assist individuals.) You may be surprised at how conservative their approach is.
The TMJ Association, for example, suggests patients stick with therapies that are reversible and the least invasive, whenever possible, including pain medications and palliative treatments. The reason is that there are little data on what works for TMJ disorders.
Surgery and implants have caused some TMJ patients even worse pain and dysfunction over the years, Cowley said. "Coverage is extremely haphazard," she notes. "It boggles the mind to think (health plans) won't pay for a heating pad, but they will pay for a surgical procedure."
Applying hot and cold compresses to the jaw, the most common therapy, was deemed the most effective of 46 treatments, including splints, physical therapy and cortisone injections, according to a survey of 1,511 TMJ sufferers published last year in The Clinical Journal of Pain.
For severely autistic children, intensive treatment called applied behavior analysis is a standard of care, said Lorri Unumb, the Lexington, S.C.-based vice president of state government affairs for Autism Speaks, a nonprofit research and advocacy group. Even so, only 28 states require insurers to offer it. Families who don't benefit from such mandates sometimes find recourse through the group's efforts, she said. "We routinely help families petition their (human resources) department to try to get this benefit added."
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
More bad advice from MSN on insurance matters. Health insurance is most often provided under an employee sponsored plan and, thus, governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). What most people don't understand about ERISA is that it gives an "administrator' of the plan discretion to determine if a procedure is covered or not. If you do end up suing the Plan for coverage, the Judge does not determine if the administrator was write or wrong, only whether the administrator abused his/her discretion in denyimg the coverage. Thus, an administrators decision could be wrong and the coverge denial will still be upheld - so long as the administrators decision was not "arbitrary or caprecious."
Also, the trial does not allow the insured to submit evidence or call witness (except in limited circumstances). Instead, the judge "reviews the record" - i.e. - what you submitted in support of coverage vs. what the insurance company relied on in making its determination. Who do you suppose has its case better documented? The insurance company, of course.
And, the insurance company will set you up for failure in this regard by telling you that the appeal process (which is the record on review) is a simple process - all you have to do is requst a reconsideration of the decision. When your appeal is denied, therefore, you have nothing to support your case when the judge makes his decision.
If you have been denied coverage, and the costs of treatment are significant, seek the advice of a lawyer who is experienced in ERISA law immediately. Waiting until the appeal process has been exhausted will severly reduce your chance of a successful outcome.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.