6/11/2014 5:45 PM ET|
Why won't health insurance cover medical marijuana?
With public support for the legalization of the drug rising, insurers appear to lag. Are they just behind the times, or is someone else to blame?
Two sets of recent poll results suggest that both doctors and the public have come around on the question of cannabis use. But the resurgent Affordable Care Act, which has exceeded its original target for insurance exchange enrollments, offers no relief to patients who struggle to afford the cost of marijuana prescribed by their physicians. And the drug's status, in the eyes of both the federal government and the insurance industry, appears to be caught in a catch-22 of legality and established effectiveness.
On the question of the drug's safety, Pew reports that, "by wide margins, the public views marijuana as less harmful than alcohol, both to personal health and to society more generally." That margin overall is almost five-to-one, and includes majorities of more than two-to-one in every demographic category. Regarding legality, Pew detects "a major shift in attitudes": "As recently as four years ago, about half (52 percent) said they thought the use of marijuana should not be legal; 41 percent said marijuana use should be legal. Today those numbers are roughly reversed: 54 percent favor marijuana legalization while 42 percent are opposed." Medicinal use of marijuana enjoys broad approval, with majorities saying it should be legal in almost every demographic and partisan group.
Meanwhile, an unscientific survey conducted by WebMD set out to test doctors' attitudes toward the drug and found that a majority say "medical marijuana should be legalized nationally and that it can deliver real benefits to patients." Of 1,544 physicians surveyed, 69 percent said that cannabis "can help with certain treatments and conditions," and 56 percent supported "making it legal nationwide." Support for medicinal marijuana varied by field, but even among the specialists who expressed the lowest level of approval -- rheumatologists -- a majority favored legalization (54 percent). Not surprisingly, since marijuana is often used to treat cancer pain and the side effects of chemotherapy, oncologists and hematologists expressed the highest level of support for the drug (82 percent).
Though medicinal marijuana is legal in 20 states and the District of Columbia, prohibition is still in force at the federal level. Under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug, which means that in the government's view it cannot be used safely even under medical supervision. (Cocaine and morphine, by contrast, are Schedule II controlled substances, out of deference to their "currently accepted medical use in treatment.") So according to Uncle Sam, no prescriptions for cannabis can legally be written. Even investigating the drug's medical value is difficult: Research-grade marijuana is controlled by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which is interested in studying addictiveness, not therapeutic potential.
The government's position is a boon for health insurance companies, which of course don't want to pay for anything they don't have to. Obamacare has compelled insurers to make some changes to their penny-pinching ways: they can no longer deny coverage for people with preexisting conditions (or charge them more), and lifetime or annual dollar limits on essential health benefits are now prohibited. But the ACA doesn't solve the problem of companies declining to cover certain treatments prescribed by physicians.
"Medical marijuana should be covered by health insurance plans like any other doctor-recommended medicine," said Shaleen Title, an attorney and board member of reform advocacy group Marijuana Majority. "But unfortunately for patients, the Affordable Care Act doesn't affect patient use of medical marijuana because health insurance plans currently don't cover it."
There is some relief available from providers, Title explained: "Many dispensaries in legal marijuana states help by offering discounts to patients with financial hardships." But she senses an opportunity for companies to align themselves with the attitudes of doctors and their patients: "Due to rising public support, it might make good sense for a forward-thinking health insurance plan to offer medical marijuana coverage; the first insurance company to do so could attract lots of new customers."
According to Susan Pisano, spokesperson for the trade association America's Health Insurance Plans, the lack of coverage for medicinal marijuana isn't just about the federal government's legal stance -- though she did mention that first when asked why companies won't pay for it. "If you step back," Pisano said, "and you're looking at any service or treatment -- prescription drugs, etc. -- what drives coverage is evidence that something's safe and effective, whatever it is." And with respect to marijuana, "there continues to be concern about a lack of evidence about the benefits, but also concern about the potential harm from inhaling, and a call for research to be able to isolate any beneficial components and make that available in a form that isn't smoke."
Pisano said the health care industry is now more focused than it once was on scientific evaluation of treatments. "There used to be less reliance, frankly, on the evidence," she said. "What, over time, companies are understanding is that that's done two things -- one of which is compromise patient safety, in some instances, and the other is drive up costs."
As an example of this shift, Pisano mentioned the use of autologous bone marrow transplants to treat breast cancer in the 1990s. The procedure was publicized as a life-saving intervention, only to be found both costly and no more effective than alternatives. "It was touted as a treatment that was working for women with late stage breast cancer," Pisano recalled, "so much so that a dozen states and the Federal Employees [Health Benefits] Program actually required that it be covered. And then when the evidence began to come in it was really discredited. It was not even as effective as the standard treatment. It was very debilitating, and made the last months of women's lives very difficult."
Pisano says the same questions remained unanswered about medicinal marijuana: does it work, and is it better than existing therapies? "It gets muddied because of the particular treatment that they're talking about, and the intense public debate about it," she said. "But today's standards demand good evidence."
More from TheStreet
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
I don't care what you libtard potheads do...so long as it doesn't affect me or cost me anything.
Go ahead and smoke your life away libtards....
but that's the libtard way...make someone else pay for your ridiculous lifestyle
Why don't Insurance companies cover many legally prescribed medications, including Marijuana ?
Insurance companies are run by vile, greedy, monsters, who would rape a baby if it meant a dimes worth of profit......
Isn't that already common knowledge ?
*** Don't Take My Medication Bro ***
What a sham medical marijuana is. While it may give relief to a small percentage of the population with a real medical need most of the potheads smoking it are just gaming the system to get high. Their so- called medical needs are made up. Hey Doc I'm "Depressed" because my favorite NFL team lost last week, or my SSI Disability check got lost and I'm "Stressed" Bro. What a collection of life's losers. There is a simple solution to put this genie back in the bottle. Simply make it law that the active ingredient in pot that gives these losers their high be extracted and put in "PILL" form. No more pipes, no more joints, no more bongs and no more phoney 420 doctor medical marijuana evaluations. Real Doctors working at Real Medical Centers giving out Real Prescriptions to Real Pharmacies in the form of TCH pills only! Put that idea in your bong you hippie lettuce smoking losers...
So my health insurance company would rather treat my chronic pain with oxycontin - a drug that's a few atoms away from heroin.
luckily my "dispensary" doesn't require a prescription.
And they say we need to keep marijuana illegal because it's a "gateway" drug. which do you think has created more heroin addicts, marijuana or opioid prescriptions?
maybe if weed were legal on the federal level it would be covered. as current laws are written you can go to jail for possession whether or not you have a Rx for it. Same goes for financing it. They need to rewrite these stupid laws. We are past the butt plugger marriages...lets move on to something that matters now
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON HEALTH INSURANCE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'