5/22/2012 3:37 PM ET|
Banks accused of foreclosure bias
The big banks may be neglecting foreclosed homes in minority neighborhoods, according to one housing discrimination watchdog.
The green bungalow at 136 Chappell Road in northwest Atlanta brings a little bit of the country into the big city -- a wooded lot, a big lawn, a wraparound front deck. But come in for a closer look and you'll notice that the windows are boarded up, the wood siding has started to peel, and two holes have opened in the front eaves. Old tires lean against one side and the back door is missing. Inside, debris is strewn around the living room and mold grows on the walls.
A coalition of fair housing groups say those conditions are present in hundreds of foreclosed homes around the country that have been taken over by banks -- and they claim that the new owners are not treating all homes equally.
The National Fair Housing Alliance and four sister organizations spent a year visiting bank-owned houses (also known as real-estate owned homes, or REOs) in 11 major cities across the country. In April, the groups released a report charging that once banks take possession, they do a far better job of maintaining and marketing homes in white neighborhoods than they do in minority neighborhoods.
The groups evaluated the maintenance and marketing of more than a thousand REOs in cities such as Atlanta, Dallas and Washington, D.C. Their report concludes that the REOs in minority neighborhoods that they visited were 34% more likely to have significant trash and debris outside and 82% more likely to have broken or boarded windows. Bank-owned houses in white neighborhoods, they say, were 33% more likely to be marketed with "for sale" signs, which is critical to attracting owner occupants as buyers, rather than investors.
In the house on the left, the authors of the NFHA report found almost no damage when they visited the property. The lawn had been recently mowed and a for-sale sign was prominently displayed. In the right house, the authors found chipped paint, damaged steps, broken gutters and a kicked-in door.
The NFHA has also recently filed complaints with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development against Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank, and hopes to file complaints against more banks in the future. The documents allege that both banks have failed to maintain and market their REOs in minority compared with white neighborhoods and thus have violated the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which makes it illegal to discriminate in housing and housing-related activities.
U.S. Bank spokeswoman Teri Charest responded that, because the bank has not received details of specific properties involved in the complaint, it's impossible to know whether it owns them. She says the bank has a "strong and comprehensive" process for inspecting and maintaining properties it owns. Wells Fargo did not respond to a request from The Fiscal Times for comment, but recently a bank spokesman told Spanish-language newspaper El Hispano that the bank "conducts all lending-related activities in a fair and consistent manner without regard to race, and this includes maintenance and marketing standards for all foreclosed properties for which we are responsible."
NFHA president Shanna Smith says that before groups visited the properties, they verified that Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank were the owners of record, using data from sources such as federal databases, county tax records and private real-estate data vendors.
Ryan Pulliam, a contractor and the CEO of All Seasons Eviction, which offers property preservation services in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., agrees that in the minority neighborhoods where he works, REOs are less well kept. But he attributes the disparity to bank mismanagement, rather than any overt discrimination, calling the big banks' contracting process "a mess."
Pulliam says that banks can take months to approve bids for work and sometimes use more than one main contractor to service houses, which can lead to contradictory orders to subcontractors. He adds that because there's not much difference in the cost of repairing and maintaining houses of different values, banks prioritize fixing up, maintaining and selling homes in more expensive areas. The local banks, he says, do a far better job of maintaining their REOs.
Alan Mallach, a housing and community development scholar at the Brookings Institution, thinks the disparate treatment may have more to do with economics than race. "These lenders typically are large impersonal entities that are focused on the bottom line. I'd be a little surprised if they neglect properties that have value . . . for racial reasons." But he adds that houses in neighborhoods of color might be undervalued compared with economically similar white areas. That, in turn, might lead banks to be reluctant to spend money on REOs in those areas because of their lower values.
Still, that doesn't relieve banks of their responsibility for upkeep, he says: Once a bank takes title to a property, it has a "legal and moral responsibility" to maintain it. And the NFHA's Smith notes that they are not asking for major renovations on houses in these neighborhoods, but basic upkeep -- fixing gutters, removing trash and mowing yards.
A representative of the Department of Housing and Urban development said the agency can't comment . . . Under agency policy, if HUD finds the claim has merit, it will investigate and invite the NFHA and the banks to negotiate an agreement. If the banks don't come to the table, the case goes before a HUD administrative law judge, or the NFHA could ask the Department of Justice to pursue it in federal civil court. Smith says the coalition would like to work out an agreement to change bank practices. But if that doesn't happen, the coalition is prepared to go to court.
Whatever the outcome, those who live near bank REOs are "furious," says Gail Williams of Metro Fair Housing of Atlanta, which participated in the investigation. According to a study by the Appraisal Institute, an overgrown yard or deteriorating home can reduce the value of surrounding homes by as much as 15%. In surveys of the people who live next to REO homes, NFHA says neighbors often step in to cut the grass and clean up debris themselves.
So even while real estate starts to recover around the country, say the housing advocates, in these neighborhoods, the housing crash lives on.
More from The Fiscal Times:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Neighborhoods cannot be described as one certain "minority" or other. That is discrimination straight up.This article implies all members of a particular minority only buy property over here while that minority buys over there and the whites buy down the road that way. According to the Fair Housing Act anybody can buy anywhere as long as they can afford it so all neighborhoods can potentially be racially mixed but that doesn't make for a very interesting article. Shame on MSN for attempting to further incite racial bias and inequality by labeling more affordable neighborhoods as "Black" or "Hispanic" and more affluent neighborhoods as "White." Proper labeling is a $20,000-$50,000 neighborhood, a $100,000-$130,000 neighborhood, etc.
one house was owned by people who work, earn an income and take pride in their home, the other was owned by some one who has their home paid for by the government and didnt give a rats **** about taking care of it. Why should the bank have to take care of the minortiy home when they didnt take care of it themselves
Then the Dems say it was due to "predatory" lending but what do they do when the smoke clears? They start leaning on the banks again all in the name of fairness. Then the banks try to foreclose on those sh*tty loans and the leftists say that it's unfair predatory foreclosure!
Wash, rinse, repeat.
Life is so lonely .I am a older and single woman at present .I need a man who can love me back .I also uploaded my hot photos on..... Agedmatch...... under the name of DM1129..It’s the largest and best club for seeking Older seniors, successful people, users over 50.. Please Check it out!I’m serious.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.