11/4/2009 9:00 AM ET|
How to invest $1,000 right now
Thinking of buying all your favorite stocks with just a grand? Forget it. For your own safety, you'll need a different approach. Fortunately, there's free help.
So you want to start investing, but you have only $1,000?
Don't even think about individual stocks. Even great stock pickers come up with their shares of duds. You need to own at least 10 stocks to keep one clunker from sinking your portfolio returns. You can't do that with $1,000.
Your best approach is to put that $1,000 into an old-fashioned managed mutual fund. Yes, I know, traditional mutual funds won't give you much to talk about in the locker room. They are nowhere near as fashionable as the new kids on the block, exchange-traded funds, or ETFs. But mutual funds are better suited to your needs.
Most ETFs track indexes that reflect the action of a particular market segment, such as biotechnology or energy stocks. So to make money with ETFs, you have to successfully predict which industries or market sectors are going to outperform over your investment horizon -- say, the next 12 months. That's a tall order even for an experienced investor.
It makes more sense to hire a qualified mutual fund manager. Pros have better access to information, and many have teams of analysts to help with the task.
Picking the best manager
Of course, not all mutual funds are created equal. Many underperform. The trick is to find a fund manager with a long track record of beating the market.
But high returns by themselves won't cut it. Here's why:
Even the best funds have good years and bad years. Say you put your $1,000 into a volatile fund and that fund hits a dry spell. You watch your $1,000 shrink to $900, then to $800 and so on. If you're like most investors, you'll bail out before the fund turns around. Thus a track record of low volatility is just as important as overall returns.
Here's a strategy I devised using Morningstar's free fund screener, to spot funds that have that magic combination of market-beating returns and low volatility, and welcome small investors.
With a few modifications, you can use other online tools, of course.
Start by selecting "domestic stock" from the "fund group" drop-down menu. If you prefer to focus on international funds, select "international stock" instead.
Screening parameter: Fund group = domestic stock.
Suitable for small investors?
Next we'll limit the field to funds that accept small investors.
Because the bookkeeping and customer-support costs are basically the same regardless of account size, many funds establish relatively high minimum opening balances to avoid dealing with small investors. This screening parameter rules out funds that won't accept $1,000 initial investments (after that, you can usually add to your holdings in smaller increments). If you have more to invest, select a value from the drop-down menu that suits your needs.
Screening parameter: Minimum initial purchase less than or equal to $1,000.
Don't pay loads
Many fund operators rely on financial advisers and stockbrokers to market their funds. They collect fees, called loads, to compensate advisers or brokers for recommending their funds. Front loads are paid when you purchase a fund, while deferred loads are paid when you sell. Most load funds charge one or the other, not both.
Loads are simply marketing expenses. The money doesn't go to hiring smarter analysts or to buying better computers. The loads reduce your returns, and there is no point in paying them if you're picking funds on your own.
Screening parameter: Load funds = no-load funds only.
Go with the best stock pickers
Some fund managers are better stock pickers than others. Although this is a controversial topic, I've found that, assuming the same manager is at the helm, a fund with a strong historical track record is likely to outperform funds that have lagged the market, at least over the next year or so.
Of course, a manager who has consistently outperformed through all sorts of market conditions is a better bet than a newcomer who might have had a good year simply because he or she got lucky and picked a few good stocks.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
If youre that worried about $1,000 odds are you shouldnt be investing. Puting it into a mutual fund is about as useless as keeping it in a regular savings account.
Like everyone if you invest money you are looking to make it rich so STAY AWAY FROM THE BIG COMPANIES. If you think you are gonna get rich buying Disney stock at $36 I want to sell you some swamp land in Arizona. Same for Google, Apple, IBM. Your best chance of buying a stock that will double in less than 5 years? Home builders. The greatest part about a homebuilder stock is not only have they #1 lasted through the housing bottom, but #2 they are starting to make money again, and #3 when the market turns around imagine how much their stocks will go up. $5 a share for Standard pacific right now has a better chance to hit $15 (triple in value) in 5 years and probably will in 10 years for sure over say Disney hitting $108 (tripling in value) in that same time frame.
It is a bigger rush seeing a stock jump 10% or more in price occasionally than it is to see mutual fund prices go up or down a few cents, so maybe an account at Etrade and a few hundred on a $5 stock like Citygroup would spur interest if you need a little more than the funds alone.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).
Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'