10/1/2008 9:00 AM ET|
Core vs. noncore investments
PORTFOLIO 106: To reach your investment goals, your portfolio needs a solid, sensible core. Sound boring? Well, it's not the most exciting part of investing, but it may be the most important.
The core-holding concept has to be one of the most exciting investing ideas since Christopher Columbus started cold-calling potential backers.
OK, that's sarcasm. "Core holding" and "exciting" don't go together. But what core holdings lack in thrills, they make up for in importance.
A core holding is just what it sounds like: It's the central part of your portfolio. The core requires investments that will be reliable year in and year out. They're the solid foundation for the rest of a portfolio.
To reach your investment goals, your portfolio needs a solid, reliable core.
What makes a core mutual fund?
Large-cap blend funds, which own big companies with middle-of-the-road stock prices, are core stalwarts. Large-blend funds usually don't lead performance lists, but they're even less likely to bring up the rear. They're boring, which makes them ideal core choices.
For cautious investors, large-value funds used to be the preferred core holdings. These funds invest in big, well-established companies with stocks that are cheap relative to those of other large caps. Historically, that focus on slow-growing, generally steady companies earned large-value funds the lowest risk scores of any of the Morningstar style categories.
But those risk numbers are deceiving. In down markets, value-oriented funds often lose more money than their blend counterparts. Large-blend funds may be more reliable.
But wait. If large-cap funds are good core holdings, why not large-growth funds?
Large-growth funds don't have the best temperament for core holdings; they tend to have bigger mood swings than their blend or value counterparts. Their highs are nice -- they mean higher returns -- but when they're down in the dumps, that spells bigger losses than you might want at the heart of your portfolio.
If the allure of large-growth funds is just too powerful, go ahead and invest in one. But invest in an equal amount of money in a large-value fund, too. Owning both is about the same as investing in a large-blend fund.
You might want to include a foreign-equity fund as a core holding, too. That way, you aren't staking everything on the U.S. market. The fund should focus on the world's developed markets, investing in leading companies, just as your core U.S. funds do.
Finally, a bond fund might make a good core holding if your asset allocation calls for it. Stick with bond funds that invest in high-quality securities. Focus on those that favor the intermediate part of the yield curve. Why? Because the longer a fund's maturity, the more volatile its returns generally are. You can capture much of the return of a long-maturity fund with an intermediate-maturity fund, but with a lot less volatility.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] Not much has changed since our last update as the S&P 500 remains near its low. The materials sector(+0.4%) continues to stand out while health care (-0.6%) is a notable laggard. The third-largest sector hovers near its low as biotechnology weighs. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 219.44, -2.05) trades down 0.9%.
With stocks on their lows, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX 14.19, +0.70) indicates some participants have turned towards a measure of ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|