3/1/2012 7:54 PM ET|
5 rules for an 'X-Files' market
Forget the 'new normal.' We're in an era of volatility, with swings from fervent hope to cold terror and back again. But the returns are out there.
Can we just go back to the good old days? The days when stocks went up every year? When we all talked "buy and hold"? When a 200-point drop in a day in the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) was unusual? When the challenge of investing in stocks was finding good, well-managed companies rather than predicting the direction of the dollar or when Greece would default?
Not a chance.
We have, in fact, entered a new era. It's not the "new normal" forecast by the leaders of Pimco in 2010. And it's actually more dangerous than the "paranormal" sketched out in January by Pimco's Bill Gross. Think of it as an "X-Files" economy.
This era is characterized by extreme swings between fear and hope. And we'd better get used to it. Remember 2011? The year before the current rally? That's the new era in a nutshell, I'm afraid.
And we'd better come up with strategies for investing through this period. The current reality is, after all, the only one we've got. I'm going to start this column by depressing all of us with the size of the challenge ahead. And then I'm going to give you five ways to change your investing in ways that can, I hope, make this era less painful and more profitable.
The new unreality?
Remember the "new normal?" It was the phrase bond-fund legend Gross and Pimco CEO Mohamed El-Erian coined back in 2010 to describe the financial world after the 2008 global financial crisis.
Everyone would deleverage to get rid of debt. Consumers would become frugal. Banks could forget profits, since borrowing would go way down. Houses would lose value, and renting rather than buying would be typical. Oh, and investors could forget about anything much better than a few percentage points of yield on their bonds and sluggish growth in stock prices. A 5% annual gain would seem like nirvana.
I found that downright depressing -- not least because it wasn't obviously wrong.
In January, Gross replaced the "new normal" with what he called the "paranormal." Gross begins with the observation that rather than deleveraging as described in the "new normal" paradigm, most economies have not reduced debt (U.S. and eurozone consumers are global exceptions) but instead have piled it on.
The world's central banks are adding debt to their balance sheets -- 2.74 trillion euros ($3.65 trillion) at the European Central Bank alone after the most recent round of bank loans -- so they can lend to banks that would otherwise be broke, which can then buy bonds from governments that would otherwise be broke. This has worked to the extent that the global economy has continued to expand instead of experiencing a continued recession as everybody cut debt.
But the "paranormal" economy has grown past the one danger of the "new normal" with two potentially painful outcomes. There's still the previous "new normal" risk of deleveraging and recession. But there's also now the opposite risk that economic growth, based on global monetary stimulus, will result in runaway inflation and, finally, global financial implosion. (Gross' January letter about the "paranormal" economy is here.)
And, yes, as much of a downer as the "new normal" was, as an investor, I find the prospect of the "paranormal" even more depressing.
Partly that's because Gross' second risk -- that of runaway inflation and global financial implosion -- is scarier than a "new normal." Recession isn't as scary as implosion, and the meager returns of the "new normal" were at least positive. I don't think I'd make any money during an implosion.
Our swingin' future
Mostly, it's depressing because the existence of two radically different alternative outcomes -- with a decision between them put off into some unspecified future -- will create a financial market where a wild swing toward fear of recession is followed by a swing to fear of inflation/implosion, which is then followed by a swing back to a fear of recession. And so on.
What if the actual dynamic of Gross' "paranormal" economy and financial market looks a lot like the year we just finished? What if 2011, with its wild swings between what we called risk-on and risk-off, is the normal (or paranormal, if you prefer) that we can look forward to until . . .
Well, until the world has worked off its huge imbalances of debt and cash.
Why is that so much worse that Gross' description of the "new normal?" Because the kind of volatility inherent in a pendulum swinging between fear of recession and fear of inflation/implosion creates the potential for huge losses as investors buy high and sell low over and over again. A steady average of 3% returns in the "new normal" would be bad for anybody trying to reach a financial goal, but it sure beats getting beaten up over and over again.
I don't know about you, but I didn't find 2011 much fun as an investor. Trying to navigate through all those market swings was a lot of work, and I don't have much to show for it.
I'm in the process of finishing my Jubak's Picks portfolio calculations for 2011 -- I'm double-checking the data now, and I should have it posted shortly after this column is published. It looks like my returns are lower than, but within hailing distance of, the 2.1% return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX). I've never been through a year where I did as much selling and buying and selling and buying just to hold my own. I finished the year with 40% in cash as I played intense defense. I haven't run a cash position like that since I started this portfolio in 1997.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Buy, sell, and buy and sell again -- even in long-term positions.
Surely you realize this is why Wall Street caused our present economic and market catastrophes. This is how they make their money, when we trade. They like things the way they are. The more volatility and uncertainty the better. This works for them.
Successful investors still look for good well-managed companies. Only day traders and gamblers are basing their "investing" decisions on what happens to Greece, a completely insignificant country economically.
I don't invest very often. But when .I do I like a healthy return.
Buy low Sell high and don't get greedy my friend
I'll be glad when Freeport breaks out of this range-bound trading they're in between the $41 and $45 neighborhood. I got in around $33 when they were having labor issues at Grassburg and in Peru, so I'm up nicely, but would like to see that $50 point so I can get out.
I guess I'll just enjoy the dividends until then...
❤❤❤❤so, the new normal in a nutshell is to cause global economical chaos every 3-4 years, further separating the wealthy from the poor. ok then, good to know.❤❤❤❤ BTW
still waiting on the zombie apokolypse
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the holiday-shortened week on a mixed note as the Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 0.1%, while the S&P 500 added 0.1% with seven sectors posting gains.
Equity indices faced an uphill climb from the opening bell after disappointing quarterly results from Google (GOOG 536.10, -20.44) and IBM (IBM 190.04, -6.36) weighed on the early sentiment. Google reported earnings $0.15 below the Capital IQ consensus estimate on revenue of $15.42 ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'