1/18/2013 8:45 PM ET|
A 2nd term to save the middle class
Obama steps into his second inaugural with a vow to turn around the decline of America's middle. But that promise is already in peril.
President Barack Obama, who said his "one mandate" in a second term was to help middle class families, takes the oath of office with many barriers to raising most Americans' living standards.
Most Americans started this year with a cut in take-home pay as Congress let a temporary 2-percentage-point reduction in payroll taxes expire. Workers' leverage to gain wage increases will be limited for years by competition from the swollen ranks of jobless Americans as forecasters expect the unemployment rate to remain at or above 7% through 2014.
Even with bright spots such as signs of strength in housing and an energy boom that's lowering fuel costs for manufacturers, forecasters predict a slower expansion as federal tax increases and spending cuts crimp growth and demand for exports drops with a weakening global economy. While the U.S. economy advanced at a 3.1% rate in the third quarter, growth of just 2% is seen this year, according to the median estimate of economists surveyed by Bloomberg.
At the same time, Obama faces united Republican opposition to his agenda and pressure to slash federal spending.
"The president is still fundamentally on the defensive," said Damon Silvers, policy director for the AFL-CIO labor federation. "His fundamental task is to avoid being forced into austerity measures that will hurt the economic recovery or the capacity of our government to serve the people."
Obama was confronted in his first term with an inherited recession that drove down most Americans' incomes. His second term starts with a fight to merely hold the line against the Republican House majority's push to cut benefits in entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security that many Americans rely on.
Looming battles over the budget, the legal debt limit and a round of automatic spending cuts scheduled for the end of February restrict Obama's leeway for other priorities, such as boosting infrastructure spending to stimulate economic growth.
The pieces of his economic agenda most likely to raise middle class living standards in the near term are "the parts that look like they're not going anywhere," said Larry Katz, a labor economics professor at Harvard University. These include plans for an infrastructure bank and tax breaks for new hires.
"Left by itself," Katz said, the economic recovery is likely to continue generating "tepid, small improvements" in middle-income workers' living standards "but not enough to really offset the poor performance since the late 1990s."
Middle class U.S. workers -- defined by one measure as households with annual incomes within 50% of the national median, or between about $25,700 and $77,000 -- have faced a four-decade-long erosion of living standards. It was interrupted by a rare period of rising earning power during the fast-growing economy of President Bill Clinton's second term, Katz said.
Real median household income soared to $54,932 in 1999 from $50,661 in 1996 based on constant 2011 dollars, an all-time high since the U.S. Census began reporting the data in 1967.
By contrast, median household income in November 2012 was $51,310 -- $3,850 lower than when Obama took office in January 2009, according to an analysis of census data by Sentier Research, an economic-consulting firm in Annapolis, Md.
In Clinton's second term, gross domestic product grew at an average 4.3% rate and the unemployment rate averaged 4.4%. That created a tight labor market, which provided workers leverage to press for higher wages.
Clinton also won congressional passage of a two-step increase in the minimum wage, which took effect in 1996 and 1997, creating additional upward pressure on pay; the federal minimum wage hasn't gone up since 2009, when the final step of a wage increase signed by President George W. Bush took effect.
The gains of the late-1990s are eclipsed by decades of downward pressure on pay.
Median wages for men between 25 and 64 dropped 19% - - to $34,000 a year -- from 1971 to 2011, after accounting for inflation, according to an analysis by Michael Greenstone, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economics professor and director of the Hamilton Project, a Washington research group affiliated with the Brookings Institution.
The impact of the decades-long slide in wages was initially cushioned in many families by the increasing number of women who went to work, and later by the home equity that families borrowed against during the run-up in housing prices before the real estate bubble burst.
More from Bloomberg:
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
YES, Obama is turning the economy around, which means shifting the tax burden a tiny bit toward the 1%, cutting spending, like typical GOP pet project (defense and wars), limiting loopholes and maybe raise the minimum wage (and why not have an income/bonus/benefit limit). Obama is very issue oriented, listens to his voters and objective experts; Obama also has the guts to act. He is not afraid of GOP, who until now has ruled this nation, using their most powerful tool: MONEY. But GOP lost 2008...2012...and will lose 2016...and our economy is getting better, even if it is a slow healing, and even if GOP wants Obama to fail (and tries to ruin Obama's plan, and thus our economy)...Obama's plan is working.
Save the middle class, what a crock. obummer has never been about saving the middle class, for him the middle class shouldn't exist. Socialism isn't about the middle class, the writer of this article is just another mutt from obummer's state sponsored media that wants everyone on the lower tier of modest living standards to think they can somehow become wealthy or "middle class" by following the great leader. What obummer is about is being the omnipotent one, like other communists leaders of the past and present, russia (hey, tell mutt poutan I can be more like him when I win my second term), north korean, cambodia, cuba, venenzuela, and on and on. Listen to the o-man talk, it's always me, me, me, I, I, I, never we and never us. They're all the same, only taking our freedom isn't going to be that easy here, even if he pulls the strings of the low lives that run the media. And I think it will get harder, I think we, and I mean the hard working, tax paying, GOD fearing capitalists Americans will see a point where obummer trips up, like going over that cliff when the mutt media abandons him. Take my gun? Well the hollywood crowd is starting to get sucked in to gun thing and they have no where to hide when it comes to defending their blood and guts movies and killing games that THEY make, can't lie about that, or blame that on Bush, not hearing much out of that crowd, and bottom line is, there are a lot of liberals that like their guns just as much as I like mine. Let's see 47% likability down to oh 33% or lower. When he has pi***d on enough people and spent the last of what's left like a drunken sailor, eventually, it might end up that even the federal reserve has to stop printing free money, then what. With no money left to spend, maybe obummer will just get tired of flying around playing golf and commanding empty halls with executive orders. He might even feel guilty of leaving that carbon footprint with the big airoplane, (oops! maybe I shouldn't say that), when he no longer has his open check book, he'll actually be like the rest of us. And I have a challenge for the o-man, if he will have the secret service that protects him and his family give up their weapons, then I will give mine up, fair enough I think, let's see if he's willing to do that. How bout it big boy, you got that swagger going on, let's see you put up.
The economy will continue to squeeze the middle class until the path becomes economic stimulation and growth thru the private sector.Dollars are always diluted when they filter thru the governments coffers everyone throughout the government get their share except for the people that pay the taxes. The government has grown and become so cumbersome on small business and created such dependence by many businesses for their survival. Now the government is at a tipping point at which it will be unable to perform its function. When stimulus is enacted in the name of infrastructure and the money goes overseas to companies not involved in infrastructure improvements that is disinginous. In addition much stimulus money goes as bailouts to state and local governments who are bloated beyond belief. My answer is that Mr. Obama will not be able to restore the middle class but continue to shrink it by design.
It has become clear, Obama is willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of members of the middle-class to punish even just one wealthy capitalist. His determination to confiscate and re-distribute as much wealth as possible has and will only serve to destroy the middle class, not save it.
If you put your money in the market 4 years ago it`s up 67.4%.People have nobody to blame but
themselves.This isn`t rocket science.The Dow was down 37% with Bush.The common man can
simply buy DIA which tracks the Dow.If you didn`t prosper like I did doing this blame yourself.
Save the middle class? He has been waging full scale war against the middle class for four straight years. 43% of the middle classes wealth has disappeared since he took office.
So to answer your question, YES, if he RESIGNS immediately. He has mortgaged your children's and grand children's future. He has increased unemployment from 7.2% to 10%+ back to 7.8%. He has increased the debt from 10.2 trillion to well over 16.4 trillion, and it will hit 21 trillion before he leaves office. The man is hell bent on giving the poor that refuse to earna living, everything they want, and he has given the bill to the middle class...
In 4 more years I expect the middle class to shrink in half and the 47% to grow to 65%. Socialism makes the rich poorer, eliminates the middle class, and the poor destitute.
End Obamanomics and maybe America's middle class can survive.
our government can't even calulate the minimum wage,it was 2.00 dollars in 1973 at 5 persent infalation compounded is about $14.81,sounds like congress is in violation of minumin wage law it carries a $5,000 fine i guest all of congress should pay the fine.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] A soft start for the major indices, which is fitting for some of the "analysis paralysis" that has occurred this morning with the release of the initial claims and revised Q3 GDP reports. Both reports were better than expected, yet they weren't all they appeared to be at first blush given seasonal adjustment problems for the claims number and the impact of the change in private inventories on Q3 GDP growth.
Apple (AAPL 572.91, +7.91) is providing some ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|