2/25/2013 6:45 PM ET|
Apple: Why bad news keeps coming
Analysts were slow to accept reality, lowering their forecasts only after the stock tumbled. Those revisions are now weighing on shares.
For a test case of Wall Street analysts' perverse incentives, look no further than Apple (AAPL). After rising to giddy heights, the stock has been unable to catch a break lately.
That is in no small part due to those incentives, which cause bad news to get incorporated into stock prices only gradually. One surprising consequence, according to researchers, is that unfavorable news tends to come in waves rather than being randomly interspersed with good news.
Apple's shares hit their all-time high of $705 on Sept. 21. At the time, the consensus forecast for Apple's fiscal 2013 earnings -- among the more than four dozen analysts tracked by FactSet -- was $53.56 a share. That number has been revised downward numerous times: By the end of last year, for example, it stood at $49.08 -- and currently is at $44.56.
With Apple's stock 37% lower today than its September high, some investors might argue that the current consensus forecast is a case of closing the barn door after the horses have left. Unfortunately, the news is likely to get even worse, according to Michael Clement, an accounting professor at the University of Texas at Austin who has extensively studied analyst behavior. That is because a downward revision is more likely to be followed by yet another downward revision than by an upward one.
There are several sources of this tendency, he says. One is that analysts are slow to react to new information -- especially when the news is bad. Part of their slowness is defensible: It takes time to analyze the often-complex developments that can affect a company's prospects.
But other reasons are more questionable. For example, according to Clement, analysts often are reluctant to offend a company's management, which might retaliate by restricting their future access. Analysts also are reluctant to upset institutional clients who own big positions in a stock, and who therefore don't want the analyst to talk the price down.
Because of these "powerful incentives to not get the bad news out," as Clement puts it, the market reacts far more quickly to unfavorable developments than do the analysts themselves. As a result, the typical analyst is more likely to follow the market than lead it.
Consider what happened in the three weeks following Apple's all-time high, when its stock fell by 10%. Far from taking that warning seriously, the average analyst became even more optimistic than he was previously. At the end of those three weeks, the consensus forecast was actually higher than at the beginning.
Only when Apple released its earnings a couple of weeks later, on Oct. 25, did it begin to dawn on analysts that the market had been right. In the wake of that earnings release, almost all of them revised their forecasts downward, causing the consensus estimate to drop to $50.24 a share.
But even that proved to be too little, too late. In fact, the same pattern played itself out again in the weeks leading up to Apple's January earnings release. Its stock already had fallen an additional$100 or so over that period, even as the consensus was barely changing. And then, on the day of that release, the analysts en masse revised their forecasts downward — causing the consensus to fall to below $45 a share.
Even though the analyst community appears to be constantly playing catch-up with the market, Clement emphasizes that the analysts aren't mere followers of the market's lead. That is because the market itself also reacts when analysts eventually do revise their forecasts, he says. Apple once again provides a good illustration: In the three weeks since the company's January earnings release, when almost all analysts revised their forecasts downward, Apple's stock has dropped still further.
The complex picture that emerges from the research of Clement and others is of a downward spiral. The market reacts relatively quickly to unfavorable news about a company, followed by downward revisions in analyst forecasts, leading to even further declines in the company's stock.
Though this downward spiral is frustrating to those holding shares of a company that is suffering from seemingly no end of bad news, there also is a way for traders to exploit the pattern.
The key is to avoid those companies for which recent analyst earnings forecasts have been reduced, and favor those stocks for which the recent revisions have been positive. Yet Wall Street's reluctance to incorporate bad information suggests it is even more important to avoid the companies with downward revisions than it is to favor the firms with upward revisions.
So long as most analyst revisions continue to be down, of course, that list of companies to avoid would most definitely include Apple.
One investment-advisory service that picks stocks according to the trend in analyst revisions is Zacks Investment Research in Chicago. According to tracking conducted by the Hulbert Financial Digest, its Zacks Premium service has produced an 8.8% annualized return over the past 15 years, more than three percentage points per year better than buying and holding the stock market itself, as measured by the Wilshire 5000 total-return index. (An annual subscription costs $450.)
An example of a stock that the Zacks approach favors, because of the number of analysts who recently have upped their forecasts, is Valmont Industries (VMI) , which makes utility poles and concrete structures. Quest Diagnostics (DGX) , the medical-testing company, is at the opposite end of the revision spectrum, according to Zacks.
More from MarketWatch:
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
It's even worse because these same analysts will defend some of these positions (at the expense of other stocks) beyond reason purely to protect their positions until they can get their client's money out. This is market manipulation at its most pervasive. These same bozos who say they need time to digest the complexity then will turn around and state "well we definitely saw it coming when ...". They lie, or perhaps they just do not tell the entire truth because it is profitable to behave that way. Similar to the way the GOP stratagists and GOPleaning market analysts all were certain that it would be a Romney landslide even though the one honest statistics keeper kept telling them they were wrong. There was potential profit in stating an inaccurate picture, so they did it.
Karma sure is a b***h huh Apple?
Barry's working on the gay marriage thing (big woop) and working on Mexicans coming into our country to take our jobs, and his golf game but seems to have no interest in our economy, our debt, our devaluation of our currency, our foreign policy ...... boy am I glad that I moved my residence and money to the Caymans as soon as he was re-elected!! Good luck all you nitwit Obama lovers. Taxes and expenses getting higher, incomes getting lower. As a 1%er, and no duty to pay any of the US taxes .... Ithink I'll plan a boat trip tomorrow!! KNUCKLEHEADS!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|