9/12/2012 8:08 PM ET|
Are we better off under Obama?
Republicans will ask voters if things have improved over the past 4 years, and most of the economic numbers have. But with a slow recovery leaving millions out, are the gains enough?
The 2012 election has entered the final stage in a dead heat. As the Republicans look to take down President Barack Obama, they're focusing on the piddling economic recovery as proof his policies have failed. It can be summed up in a singular question, oft repeated at the GOP convention in Tampa: Are you better off now than you were four years ago?
Clearly, Mitt Romney's supporters are looking to capitalize on a negative view of the pace of recovery, an unemployment rate still north of 8%, a housing market only beginning to stabilize and households still struggling to reduce accumulated debts at a time of stagnant wage growth.
Fair or not, it's a message that resonates.
According to a CBS News poll last month, 62% believe the country is on the wrong track -- up from 48% in the early days of the Obama administration. Some 42% believe the U.S. economy is headed for a new recession in the next few months. And 39% think their families are worse off today than they were four years ago -- about the same as what we saw in November 2008, when the country voted for hope and change in the midst of the subprime meltdown.
Obama's task, never easy, has been made more difficult by the political gridlock we've seen since Republicans won control of the House in 2010, gumming up any chance of additional fiscal stimulus or meaningful progress on the debt/deficit issue, and resulting in the credit downgrade of the U.S. Treasury last August that shocked market and business confidence.
Instead of taking action on Obama's jobs plan or looking at issues with bipartisan support (such as tax reform), Washington has descended into political blood sport where everyone plays for keeps and no one crosses the aisle. Things are likely to get worse as we barrel toward a "fiscal cliff" of tax hikes and spending cuts worth nearly 5% of the gross domestic product as the calendar flips to 2013. (Read "Countdown to the fiscal cliff.")
But before then, we've got an election to decide. And that means voters need to answer the critical question: Are we better off since Obama took office? Here's a look, by the numbers, at the past four years in the four areas that matter most: economic growth, jobs, income and wealth.
The overall takeaway: The economy has improved, but it's far from great for many Americans. Voters will have to decide whether that's good enough to elect Obama to a second term.
When Obama took office, the economy was shrinking at roughly 8% annually. For most of Obama's term, it's been growing, as the chart below shows. In absolute terms, the economy is now $853 billion larger than it was before Obama was inaugurated. So, yes, we're better off.
But if you're a little disappointed, you're not alone.
Coming out of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, ending a 20-year dependence on credit-fueled growth and in the wake of a delayed response to the crisis by the administration of then-President George W. Bush, the recovery was always going to be fitful. So it's no surprise that, 18 quarters after the pre-recession peak in GDP activity, the economy has managed to grow only 1.8% over the pre-recession high.
According to Credit Suisse economists, that's far from where we should be if this had been a normal recession -- the kind people have experienced before. On average, 18 months into a mild recession, GDP should be 10.4% larger than it is now. For a severe recession, it should be nearly 14% larger. That's almost $2 trillion in lost output, lost wages and lost prosperity.
When Obama took office, the economy was losing nearly 820,000 jobs a month. The losses stopped in December 2009, and since then, the economy has created more than 4.1 million jobs.
But we haven't fully recovered. Philippa Dunne of The Liscio Report notes that we're still 4.7 million jobs below the pre-recession peak, as the chart below shows. At the rate we're creating jobs right now, it would take four years to regain those levels -- not even accounting for population growth.
Source: Federal Reseve
What's worse is that the job-growth rate has stalled. Nonfarm payrolls added 96,000 jobs in August, the fifth sub-100,000 gain in the past six months and an average gain of 205,000 per month for the previous six months. The unemployment rate fell to 8.1%, thanks to an estimated 386,000 workers who gave up and left the labor force. As a result, the labor force participation rate is at its lowest level since 1981.
Not a good sign.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
America is in trouble. We have strayed from what made us a great country and have turned into a nanny state with a majority of people waiting for handouts from big brother.
Man, if this isn't written by a left wing liberal, Democrat I don't know what is? This is such typical bias reporting by the left news media.
The economy sucks, anyone like myself that runs a small business and actually provides jobs and doesn't suck hind tit off the governement knows it.
Anyone with a third grade education could tell you the last four years have been a disaster for the economy, anyone excpet the idiot who wrote this article.
This is where we are people, if you are a hard working American you should be writing your congressmen everyday to stop this insanity!!
America can't survive another 4 years of Obama!
Obama is taking away our freedoms. If you are over 18 in America you are now REQUIRED to buy health insurance at the price he sets or upu are fined! What kind of freedom is that?
Obama on freedom = "Screw Freedom!"
ANYBODY BUT OBAMA 2012
Half of the Country is better off, and half isn't.
The half that PAY the bills is not - the half that freeload IS.
20 year dependence? If the problem started 20 years ago, then why isn't Clinton sharing in the blame? After all, the 20 years starts with his 8!
I love how this article tries to spin numbers to support the failure in cheif!
Interesting how the author blames the Republicans for not working to pass another Obama "jobs bill" after the original stimulus was such a failure and his green energy boondoggles have cost taxpayers tens of billions of $$$ while creating few (if any) lasting jobs. Good for them.
And can anybody explain how taking more money from investors and consumers (even if they are the filthy rich) by raising taxes will help get the economy growing?
Are we better off?
I'm so tired of being fed a turd sandwich and being told it's icecream. This country & its citizens need to wakeup before it is too late.
Our president invited the Muslim Brotherhood to the whitehouse where he whined & dined them and then gave them 1.5 billion dollars.
Yesterday, the Brotherhood, who if you forgot played such a strong role in so many other terrorist attacks in the past, stormed 2 of our embassies and killed 4 Americans before burning our flag & replacing it with theirs. For 10 hours the white house apologized until it becane a political faux pas, possibly interfering with his re-election.
Every day, you turn on the TV and hear that he is the only one who will support women, gays, minorities, the poor, etc......
The last time I checked, The Brotherhood only follows Sharia law which declares women and children have no rights and are property, homosexuality is grounds for death and anyone who does not follow what they believe should be killed.
The economy is in the crapper. GM is only alive because he gave them BILLIONS of our dollars which we will never get back, our credit has been downgraded, there are no jobs, our freedoms are disappearing and he has written 12,000 regulations that help no one but him, his buddies or citizens of other countries.
If you need to stop & think about IF you are or are not better off...........then quite honestly...the lights are on but nobody is home.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 settled lower by 0.8% after early strength turned into afternoon weakness.
Today's headline event came in the form of Ben Bernanke's testimony before the Joint Economic Committee. During his remarks, Chairman Bernanke said premature tightening of monetary policy could stall the pace of recovery. This followed weeks of conflicting remarks from FOMC members, which sparked speculation regarding possible changes to the Fed's policy course.
However, ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|