9/16/2013 6:30 PM ET|
Beware surprises in Fed's taper
The central bank has signaled a gradual reduction of stimulus. But Larry Summers' withdrawal from consideration as Fed chief is a reminder that public events don't always follow a script.
Larry Summers' letter withdrawing his name from consideration to head the Federal Reserve when current Chairman Ben Bernanke departs, presumably in January, is a reminder that even carefully watched, exhaustively reported and endlessly handicapped events can produce big surprises.
Until his withdrawal, Summers was considered the front-runner for the job. Now, who knows?
Current Vice Chariwoman Janet Yellen? Donald Kohn, the No. 2 at the Fed until 2010? A dark horse candidate such as Roger Ferguson, Stanley Fischer or Jeremy Stein? Could Tim Geithner, former Treasury secretary, be in the running despite his frequently expressed disinterest in the job?
Something that seemed settled is wide open again. And the effects on the financial markets are certain to be far-reaching.
Can I envision anything nearly as surprising for Wednesday's decision by the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee on beginning versus not beginning to slow the pace at which the Fed is buying Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities? After all, the markets have had months to masticate any tapering in Fed purchases. You'd think the decision would be priced into financial assets by now.
I don't see much chance of a direct surprise. I think the big, liquid global markets -- such as those for Treasurys and currencies, including the dollar, yen and euro -- have discounted a modest Fed taper sometime before the end of this year. In a recent Bloomberg poll, 57% of investors say they don't expect a sudden change in the markets if the Fed does decide to start a taper on Wednesday. Their reason? They say they already anticipate a Fed taper.
I doubt that a Fed decision to taper this week or wait until October is going to produce more than a blip in the markets I've noted above, or in the big, liquid developed-economy stock markets.
But that doesn't mean I'm ruling out all chances of surprise.
I think we could get a surprise in less-liquid markets, which is where worry is more intense right now. That wouldn't require a change in the markets, just a continuation of the recent direction.
And that reaction could circle back to the globe's biggest asset markets. I doubt that's likely or that any move in developed markets would be big or long-lasting. But that's definitely where I'd be looking for any surprises in the second half of this week.
Let me take you on a brief tour of potential surprises.
The Fed is currently buying $85 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed assets each month to keep medium-term interest rates low. (The Fed controls short-term interest rates directly and has said that it will keep short-term interest rates at their current "extraordinarily" low level of 0% to 0.25% until 2015. The Fed has been trying to lower medium-term rates in the vicinity of seven-year maturities.)
The consensus is that the Fed, whenever it begins to taper, will do so very modestly, cutting back purchases from $85 billion a month to $75 billion or so. The first surprise, then, would be if the size of the Fed taper significantly exceeded $10 billion. A drop to, say, $70 billion, would be aggressive, but probably not enough to rattle the consensus.
A drop to a level lower than that would surprise and would undoubtedly lead to a selloff in both the bond and stock markets, though. I think the likelihood of a drop on that action is abundantly clear to the Federal Reserve.
And that's why this surprise is so unlikely. The U.S. central bank wants markets to get used to the idea of a gradual withdrawal of stimulus. That's what's been happening for the past three or four months as bond prices have fallen and yields have climbed. On Sept. 13, the yield on the 10-year Treasury closed at 2.88%. That's up from 1.87% a year ago. In that period, though, U.S. stocks have continued to climb.
The Fed wouldn't mind an increase in 10-year yields to slightly higher than 3% or a mild correction in U.S. stocks on the order of the 4% to 5% pullback in August. But the Fed doesn't want to whack the markets hard and risk endangering the U.S. economic recovery.
The Fed will begin a taper in 2013 because it has signaled to markets to expect the move, and anything else would damage the bank's credibility. But the bank doesn't want to move so fast and hard that it risks the modest economic recovery it has helped engineer.
Much more likely, but still not extremely likely, is a surprise in the mix of what the Fed buys. In the current program, the Fed buys $45 billion a month in Treasurys and $40 billion a month in mortgage-backed assets. To the degree that there is a consensus on how the Fed might balance a taper, it points to leaving purchases of mortgage-backed assets alone and reducing purchases of Treasurys.
That consensus rests on a couple of points. One is the belief that the Fed sees the housing sector as a key to keeping the economy in recovery mode and doesn't want to see mortgage rates rise. And second is the belief that the Fed is uncomfortable with its current holdings of Treasurys -- Ben Bernanke and Co. have virtually become the market for these medium-term maturities -- and would prefer to increase the market supply of these maturities.
This consensus will probably turn out to be correct, but greater-than-expected reductions in the Fed's purchases of mortgage-backed securities -- whatever "greater than expected" might turn out to be -- could temporarily spook mortgage real estate investment trusts and housing stocks. I doubt that the Fed will continue to reduce purchases of mortgage-backed securities in future tapering, so I'd see any panic on a possible Wednesday surprise in this sector as an opportunity for a short-term trade.
Emerging markets seem most likely to turn a Fed taper into a surprisingly big deal. That's because emerging markets are already worried about cash outflows and weakening currencies versus the U.S. dollar. And because any suggestion that the Fed might be on the road to eventually ending its bond purchases will set some investors and traders in these markets wondering when the central bank might begin to raise short-term interest rates.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
We will never know the true value of our assets as long as the FED keeps enabling Wall Street. Nobody has the courage to let the house of cards collapse. I believe the housing market is being propped up by the artificially low interest rates. The fact that buyers are dropping out because interest rates climbed to 4.75% should signal to us that the housing recovery(if there is one) is very fragile. We thought interest rates were low 7 years ago when they were 6%. Today 6% mortgages would level the housing market. Our economy is addicted to stimulus, only prolonging the inevitable pain to come. What short memories we have.
Perhaps Larry Summers withdrew because he didn't want to be there at the next collapse of the market?
to sum up this rather long-winded (but interesting) examination of the fed tapering -
IT'S TIME TO PAY THE PIPER BEN!!!
I like to listen to what you have to say when ever I can and if I can't the next best is reading
I believe the fact that there is no one willing to step forward to fill Chairman Bernankes' shoes
is a testament to how hard the times are.
If there was a quick fix answer to the financial problems the world is now facing we would be tripping over applicants for his position. The person who is able to solve this crisis will be remembered and their name will be written in every history book, but yet no one wants the task.
We can only hope and pray that whoever is chose will be able and willing to guide use through one of the darkest times America has known.
I don't really know a lot about how U.S. pays interest on other countries investments in our debts but if we keep our interest rates low is it a big factor in us paying interest on these huge amounts of money.
Do we want to, or can we afford to pay a higher interest rate to other countries when they own so much of our borrowing? I do not know.
If the Feds reduce the amount of QE3 then the stock and bind economy will collapse at once
Look folks the real US economy is dead and it's not dead because of the financial crisis of 5 years ago
It is dead because you need $200,000 a year now to live in most cities in the US and people are still being fired from $80,000 plus jobs and most new jobs are paying minimum wage $7.25 for only 29 hours a week.
That is why the US economy is dead and no amount of Federal QE3 is going to save it.
We are locked into a long term Death Spiral of Lost Jobs and an ever weaker and weaker economy and the silly QE3 is merely hiding the decline and making some people think the economy is recovering. It is not. It has gotten worse and at best we will not win.
The whole issue is moot since Obama is hell bent on shuting the entire federal government down. Obama would rather destroy the entire economy rather that not fund OBAMACARE. Republicians propose to fund the ENTIRE government; SS, Medicare, FDA, Education, Defense, OSHA, Homeland, EPA, and thousands of other programs and yet if there is no funding for OBAMACARE, Obama will veto the budget and HE WILL SHUT THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT DOWN.
With our government having so much influence on day to day market trade I would say we are about as socilaist as we can be with our calling ourselves a socialist country.
I fear the direction this country is going. people better wake up because we are loosing what our fathers and grandfathers and great grand fathers fought and died for.
I wonder how the FED's tapering will effect jobs. Job creation seems to be the missing link to a robust economy. Full-time, career type jobs by the way.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the session on a lower note as the S&P 500 lost 0.4% while the Nasdaq shed 0.1%. The Russell 2000, which paced the retreat on Tuesday and Wednesday, added 0.2%, trimming its December loss to 3.5%.
After spending the first half of the session in a steady retreat, the S&P 500 found technical support in the 1772 area. Upon reaching that level, the index reversed sharply, and marched back to its flat line. There was no particular catalyst ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|