Reading the bull
I see the world's central banks as the drivers in the bull market that took off after the global financial crisis. The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of China and other national central banks have pumped money into the global economy to head off the potential collapse of the world's financial system and to stimulate the world's economies.
They've done this by driving interest rates to historic lows near zero in the United States and Japan and by pumping money into global economies through programs of bond buying that effectively created money. To take just two examples, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet expanded to $2.92 trillion in the week ended Jan. 10. That's roughly three times the size of the balance sheet before the financial crisis. The European Central Bank's balance sheet hit a 2012 high in June at $4.15 trillion (at recent dollar/euro exchange rates).
Even in normal times, creating that much money would have increased the value of financial assets. Some of that created money would flow into the real economy in the form of investment in things like new factories. Some, however, would have flowed into purchases of stocks and bonds -- and into real estate, as well.
But these haven't been normal times. With companies often reluctant to invest and banks often reluctant to lend, a larger-than-usual portion of this created money has flowed into financial assets. And some of that was absolutely intentional as central banks tried to reinflate collapsed real-estate markets, recapitalize damaged banks and prop up the government bonds of troubled countries in the eurozone. Add in the effect of low interest rates on asset prices -- when new bonds pay just 0.25%, older bonds with higher return rates and stocks with higher dividends rise in price -- and the central banks have provided considerable fuel for a bull market.
Of course, central banks were glad to see stock and bond markets moving up, since the wealth effect created by rising markets led to an increase in consumer confidence and a pickup in spending.
But you should be asking, "Now what?"
The Federal Reserve is committed to a program of asset purchases of $85 billion a month through the end of 2013 (probably). But that's not an increase.
The European Central Bank proudly noted at President Mario Draghi's most recent news conference that it begun to shrink its balance sheet (although a new flare-up of the eurozone debt crisis would quickly reverse that shrinkage).
The Bank of China still seems committed to stimulating China's economy, but it has moved relatively carefully, holding off longer than expected on interest-rate cuts, for example. An increase in inflation in December to 2.5%, while still below the government's 4% target, certainly won't make the bank less cautious.
Will the banks keep it up?
Of the world's major central banks, only the Bank of Japan is still increasing its program of monetary stimulus. The Bank of Japan is expected to increase its inflation target to 2% on Jan. 22, which would commit the bank to a big increase in bond buying and to other measures that would weaken the yen.
I look at the argument about secular bull/secular bear through the prism of global central bank policy. The central banks have fueled the bull market that began in 2009 by creating trillions in cash, much of which flowed into financial assets. I don't see the banks releasing another flood of cash on the global economy, absent a new global crisis (which would not be good for asset prices, of course).
Does that mean global financial markets will tumble?
No. Increasing corporate earnings could prop up stock prices at current levels or even move them higher in the months ahead. Wall Street optimists seem to be counting on this for the second half of 2013. But with the eurozone economy in recession and U.S. growth looking weaker, at least in the first half of the year, I find it hard to make a strong argument that U.S. stock prices should end the year markedly higher than they are now based on profits.
Why the bear will be back
I think that leaves the decision on secular bull/secular bear up to two other factors.
First, can a recovery in economic growth in China and increased economic growth in the rest of Asia power global financial markets in those countries absent support from U.S. or European markets? This would require that emerging financial markets decouple from developed-world markets (or that they advance strongly enough that they drag developed markets behind them).
That's not out of the question, since valuations in emerging markets are relatively low and growth prospects are relatively high. But it would require that problems in Europe, Japan and the United States not rise to the level that in 2011 and 2012 prompted global investors to shun any markets with a whiff of risk. If investors wind up buying U.S., Japanese and German bonds with negative real yields again because they're willing to pay anything for safety, then emerging markets certainly won't outperform. I think that the current outperformance of emerging markets makes them attractive enough to overweight in the first half of 2013 and into the second half. After that, it will be time to re-evaluate.
Second, can the world's central banks begin shrinking their balance sheets -- a necessity to keep the faith of the financial markets -- without throwing the global economy (and global financial markets) into reverse?
If there's one thing that makes me pessimistic about financial markets during the next half-decade or more, and that makes me give high odds to an end to the cyclical bull market and a continuation of a secular bear market, this is it. Shrinking a $3 trillion or $4 trillion balance sheet without slowing an economy is horrendously difficult -- so difficult I'm not sure it can be done. Looking out over the next decade, I see a combination of rising interest rates and slowly shrinking balance sheets eating into growth rates at a time when national governments are facing rising costs from aging populations.
It's hard to see that as a recipe for a secular bull market. Rather, it seems to describe the combination of low returns and high volatility that Pimco's Bill Gross has called the "new normal" and that I've called the paranormal market. I think there are strategies for wringing a profit out of a market like this, and I've described some of them in a series of posts on the paranormal market. You can begin that series with this post at JubakPicks.com. Links in that post will take you to earlier parts in the series.
What I don't think will work for investors in this period are strategies that are built on a hope that we'll be going back to the great secular bull market of 1982 to 2000 anytime soon.
Updates to Jubak's Picks
These recent blog posts contain updates to the stocks in Jubak's market-beating portfolios:
- Wait to buy Yum Brands
- Statoil expands its global reach
- Abbott spins off AbbVie. Which to buy?
- Time for a commodity rally?
- Is Yum Brands having a problem in China?
- Novartis set to deliver blockbuster drugs
Find Jubak's most recent articles, blog posts and stock picks here.
Meet Jim Jubak at the World MoneyShow
Is it time to give your portfolio its annual checkup? If so, join thousands of investors like yourself at the World MoneyShow Orlando, which runs from Jan. 30 to Feb. 2 at the Gaylord Palms Resort in Orlando, Fla. At the world's largest investor and trader gathering, you'll hear from MSN Money columnist Jim Jubak and dozens of other top investment experts. Registration is free for MSN Money users; just sign up on the World MoneyShow website.
Online seminar: 'Invest in the New BRICS'
Join Jim Jubak and MoneyShow.com on Jan. 23 for a special online seminar on investing in newly emerging global economies that could outgrow places like Brazil and China. Stocks in countries such as Colombia, Turkey, Indonesia and Nigeria (yes, Nigeria) are getting a dual boost from higher economic growth and the arrival of better fiscal policies that are earning these countries good credit ratings. Details and registration information are on the World MoneyShow website.
Jim Jubak's column has run on MSN Money since 1997. He is the author of the book "The Jubak Picks," based on his market-beating Jubak's Picks portfolio; the writer of the Jubak's Picks blog; and the senior markets editor at MoneyShow.com. Get a free 60-day trial subscription to JAM, his premium investment letter, by using this code: MSN60 when you register at the Jubak Asset Management website.
Click here to find Jubak's most recent articles, blog posts and stock picks.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Whenever I get the chance to speak to a person over about 80 years old, I try to ask them how they think things are going in the country today. So far I haven’t gotten many optimistic responses. One lady about 90 years old summed up the bulk of responses quite well, “I’m glad I won’t be around to see how bad it’s going to get.”
The Golden Age of America is over and now we see places like Detroit rust while we battle (iron) in countless parts of the world trying to hold our political/economic empire together.
Ima too a stupid to understand that article. Either we are in some cyclical bear or secular bull? All smells the same to me.
Whatever label you want to put on this market it is all very simple. When they quit printing money the market will start going backwards. When they start unwinding their balance sheet, it will get worse. The flood of central bank money has canceled out any cycles that might have once existed.
The market climbs a wall of worry.The last time the market looked real rosy
was early 2000.We know what happened then.
Bull or bear market......when in history has a country ran trillion dollar deficits year after year
Where in when in history has a federal reserve bank (aka central planning) used their printing press to print trillions of dollars of new money......and is still printing 85 billion per month, despite all of these positive signs with unemployment and housing.
And Wall Street parties and cheers......of course, they are enjoying huge salaries and bonuses from all of this manipulation.
Balance the budget and put away the printing press, and then let's truly see what a mess we are truly in, and people on Wall Street can get real jobs
Bernanke has been printing non-stop for years now. How long more can he print before it back fires? Printing money or borrowing money to stimulate the economy is not going to fix it. The deficit of 1.5 trillion is funding 50 to 60 million jobs in America. We are borrowing to spend on consumer economy. These are all service sector jobs. Google for 2013 INVESTMENT REPORT KONDRATIEFF WAVE to understand why these jobs cannot be sustained. We need manufacturing jobs, science, engineering and technology jobs. Service sector jobs are not able to help curb trade deficit. It is a dead end. Keynesians are dead wrong about it. At the end of the day, they won't be able to spend to stimulate the economy. Once their hand is forced, the crash will be unlike anything we have ever witnessed. We need to let the free markets run so that private sector can align itself with what works and what does not. FED is giving the wrong signals to the economy and it is creating wrong kind of jobs. These jobs won't survive the next leg down. Our money supply is not what the FED prints. It is what we borrow. If we do not have healthy credit markets, borrowing and lending will lose it's meaning and if credit deflates, despite Bernanke's best efforts, we are going to have deflation!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the midweek session on a mixed note. Blue chip listings bolstered the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.4%) and S&P 500 (+0.3%), while the Russell 2000 (-0.4%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.02%) underperformed.
Equity indices began the day in the red, but wasted no time regaining their flat lines. Small-cap stocks were not as fortunate as the Russell 2000 spent the day in the red.
Upon returning into positive territory, the key indices were ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'