6/18/2014 3:30 PM ET|
9 financial risks everyone should understand
Before you decide how to invest, consider your biggest fears about money.
My friend Mike grabbed my arm as he barged into the conversation I was having with some other guys.
"What I really want to know, is where do you think I should invest now?"
I could have given him the usual answer -- that I'm not a financial adviser and that I don't pick investments for people -- but instead I answered his question this way:
"That may be what you want to know, but what you need to know first is 'What's your greatest financial fear?'"
Mike, a pilot, immediately answered that he's worried about another layoff. Chris, to his right, is scared of the market having a repeat of the meltdowns he saw in 2000 and 2008. Bob said he worries about outliving his money or needing long-term care.
And so it went for a few minutes, each guy coming up with a few legitimate things to fear, or nodding in agreement with the concerns cited by someone else, as the worries ran from current socio-economic events to providing for a special-needs child, to fear of missing out on the market's gains, to not being able to pay to put the kids through college and more.
Finally, Mike said, "Maybe you just say that what I fear the most is losing money or mismanaging money."
The problem with all of these concerns is that even if you work to solve your biggest fear, you may still feel vulnerable to other worries.
If losing money in the market is your biggest fear and you go to all cash in response, you assuage the big worry, but over time you will have a growing scare that your money isn't keeping pace with inflation or, perhaps, that you will outlive your nest egg.
Moreover, if you take that kind of all-or-nothing position, having everything in cash could leave you afraid that if the market doesn't have a comeuppance soon, you've lost real opportunities to grow your savings.
While an individual's financial fears morph and evolve, risks don't. Certain dangers may be more or less present based on current events and conditions, but the underlying risks don't change.
As a result, it's important for investors to see how their worries align with the various types of risk:
Market risk, or "principal risk," is the chance that a downturn (or a bad investment) chews up your money. It's there for both stocks and bonds -- when interest rates rise, bondholders will see the market value of their paper shrink -- and for most people it's the big bugaboo.
Inflation or purchasing-power risk for most people is the "risk of avoiding risk" -- the opposite end of the spectrum from market risk -- the possibility that you are too conservative and your money can't grow fast enough to keep pace with inflation.
Interest-rate risk generally revolves around how rates will change. If you seek a long-term "risk-free return" by putting your money in a bank certificate of deposit, you face the chance that interest rates rise and your assets are stuck at what has become a below-average rate of return.
Shortfall risk is about you, personally, more than the market; it's the chance that you won't have enough money to make your goals. You can face shortfall risk by being either too conservative or too aggressive; if you don't believe your portfolio can deliver enough, the best way to address this risk is to save more.
Special-situation risk involves your life as well, whether it's the special-needs case, planning for college, saving for a big event like a wedding or something else. Most parents get to a point when paying for college is a key concern -- a worry that distracts them from saving more for their own retirement -- but those circumstances eventually pass.
A close cousin is timing risk, another highly personal factor that hinges on your time horizon. While experts agree that the chance that stocks will make money over the next two decades is high, the prospects for the next two years are murky; if you need your money in two years, you have a worry about timing.
Liquidity risk affects everything from junk bonds to foreign stocks. On a broad scale, it can be the chance that investments in a particular country suffer during some sort of credit crisis, or the potential for a thinly-traded stock to crater or for its shares to be difficult to redeem in a crisis. It also occurs in investment products like non-traded REITs, where the investment cannot be sold at its perceived value if the money is needed on a moment's notice.
Political risk is the prospect that government decisions will damage the value of your investments. Whether it's the safety of Social Security, the impacts of a policy like Obamacare and how it might affect stocks in your portfolio, tax-law changes or more, this is the chance that broad policy decisions hit home.
Societal risk is ultra-big picture, looking at world events. This is what might happen in the event of terrorist attacks, war or catastrophe.
Diversification, of course, involves taking on some or all of these risks, so that no concern comes up and ruins you. But that's also why you can figure out where to invest "now" by considering your biggest financial worry and playing to that particular type of risk.
Depending on circumstances and your nerves, the best move might be staying in cash and building emergency savings, or it could be exploring micro-cap stocks or emerging markets bonds.
In short, the answer for every guy in that conversation could be different, as it could be if you, your friends, family and co-workers tried to determine "where it's best to invest now." When you want to know where to invest "next," re-evaluate your situation and, again, adjust based on your concerns at that point.
It may mean that whatever you do now won't be the choice that makes the most profit or that generates the hottest return, but it does mean that your actions should increase your ability to sleep at night. And that's a win -- no matter what the market does next.
More from MarketWatch
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Well actually they have it backwards. The longer we wait to solve the massive growing Global Debt Bubble, the longer it will take to even have a remote chance in Hades of solving it.
Jason is right,
"Republinazi and dumbocrats public office holders who are really employees of rich international corporations are the biggest threats to financial security."
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, 'the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."
~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006
What I would do
No government sponsored aid to foreign countries. No prohibiting individual aid to a foreign country unless the country is an enemy.
No tax on wages. No tax on investments. Tax on sales only.
No aid to anyone who is not a citizen. No aid to anyone who is a drug addict or alcoholic, other than treatment for their lack of will power.
All costs for airports (security, flight control) are to be paid by ticket fees and fuel surcharges.
All costs for road construction, maintenance and public transit to be paid by gas taxes, rider fares or tolls.
To be a citizen in full standing you must be born of two citizens or be born of one citizen on United States land. Being born of one citizen in a foreign country or being born in this country of two non-citizens would give you the right of dual citizenship on your 18th birthday; you would not be entitled to any benefits you had not earned.
No elected or hired employee of the government would be exempt from any law.
All government employees would be part of SS. No pensions. Including judges, congress and the president.
The president would be elected for one, six-year term. Could run again in six years after leaving office.
The senate would be elected for one, six-year term. Could run again in six years after leaving office.
The congress would be elected for one, three-year term. Could run again in three years after leaving office.
No lawyer could run for congress or for president. It is a violation of the separation of powers. Lawyers could only be judges.
No federal government employee would be allowed to belong to a union.
Stop all visas for any reason from countries that are hostile to the United States, including Russia and China, and stop visas to anyone who is a citizen of that country.
All students on education visas would be required to check in and update or confirm their addresses twice a year.
Anyone here on a work visa would be required to check in and update or confirm their addresses once a year.
All embassies in hostile countries to have marine security.
Suspend all immigration until we have our system in order. Allow states to activate the National Guard to patrol the borders.
The National Guard could only be deployed in the United States. Each state would be in control of its own units and only the state could have the power to call them up for duty.
My biggest fear is that someone will step on the power cord and unplug the printing press.
I don't trust this economy, this government and certainly not this market. That's why I'm only 40% stocks. I may not get all the gains, but I won't get all the loses either, and I will have plenty of money to use to buy when the market is low.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market began the new trading week on the defensive note with small-cap stocks pacing the retreat. The Russell 2000 (-1.4%) and Nasdaq Composite (-1.1%) displayed relative weakness, while the S&P 500 lost 0.8% with all ten sectors ending in the red.
Global equities began showing some cracks overnight after China's Finance Minister Lou Jiwei poured cold water on hopes for new stimulus measures. Specifically, Mr. Lou said the government has no plans to change ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'