1/15/2013 7:15 PM ET|
Facebook's era is over: Now what?
Silicon Valley has been eerily quiet since the social-networking company's IPO. The bold, crazy, visionary ideas seem to have disappeared -- for now.
It is nice to see shares of Facebook (FB) break $30 again, though they still are down nearly 20% from their offering price.
But investors have moved on.
We are looking for the next big idea.
The social-networking company's initial public offering in May might have been the high-water mark of technology's new wave: a resurgence in life-changing technologies marked by social-media platforms and mobile delivery built around the Internet.
The symbols of this new wave included Groupon (GRPN), Zynga (ZNGA), LinkedIn (LNKD) and Pandora Media (P). Excitement over this generation of tech companies and ideas spurred innovation, changed lives, made their founders stars and fueled a much-needed wave of deals.
Last year brought 81 technology IPOs valued at a combined $29.3 billion, or more than three times the volume in 2008, according to Dealogic.
Even better, it made Wall Street relevant again by reminding a bailout-weary nation of the industry's role in fostering American capitalism.
Still, we seemed aware that it was too good to be true. The question facing the industry wasn't if there was a bubble, but how big it was and how long it would last.
Since Facebook stumbled out of the gate, however, things have been awfully quiet. There hasn't been a significant Internet tech offering. Even worse, there hasn't been any sustained buzz about anything in Silicon Valley, much less the next potential IPO.
(Except for Twitter. It has been seven years. We're still waiting on Twitter.)
It is true that 2012 was the best fundraising year for venture-capital funds since 2008; they raked in a combined $20.57 billion.
But some leading voices in Silicon Valley sound downright despondent about what isn't happening there. Michael Arrington, entrepreneur and founder of TechCrunch, said in a year-end lament about the lack of new ideas that he "was bored."
"I just don't see the tons of crazy new ideas that I did a few years ago," he wrote, "things that are genuinely new and interesting."
The numbers back him up. Venture-capital fundraising fell to $3.29 billion in the fourth quarter from $6.2 billion in the second quarter. And the number of venture funds shrank by one-third to 42 at year-end from a two-year high of 66 in the third quarter of 2011, according to Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association.
And those standard-bearers of tech's new wave? Since the end of June, only LinkedIn's share price is higher. Pandora is flat, while Groupon and Zynga shares have skidded.
Mergers and acquisitions are generally a sign of a booming market, but 2012 was a down year, with just $780 billion in deals, compared with $877 billion in 2010, according to Dealogic.
As bubbles go, this one had all of the staying power of a birthday balloon in a pin factory. Should we have seen it coming?
Probably not. The postmortems are pouring in, and the consensus is that what we witnessed was a flash in the normal course of innovation. The rapid success of the social-media and mobile new wave sucked up all the air in the room, perhaps to blow into the balloon.
Inventors, entrepreneurs and those who financed them wanted to create the next viral platform. The pursuit became, as entrepreneur Francisco Dao called it, an "echo chamber" far from "the forefront of technology" where real innovation is taking place.
Separately, investors on Wall Street were disillusioned by the empty promise of Groupon and Zynga. Facebook's stumbles and the suspicion that insiders "in the know" were looking to cash out before a crash became the final blow to confidence.
In the last 20 years, we have seen four separate peaks of tech bubbles (1995, 2000, 2007 and 2012). There will be another. It doesn't even need to work. We just need to be able to get excited about it.
Until then, we can just wait for Twitter.
More from The Wall Street Journal:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
People who think Facebook can be easily replaced are ignoring how incredibly massive it is. In *2009* they had 40 billion photos with about 2000 new photos added per second, a data set size of 2 petabytes and around 30000 servers. (One may assume it's a bit bigger since then.) The financial outlay to compete at that scale is staggering. Only a few companies like Google or Microsoft could manage it. (Note: since Apple's iCloud is actually built on top of Microsoft's Azure data services, they aren't really a scale player on their own. Microsoft still owns the servers)
With respect to Google, Google search has a massive dataset but no actual content. They just index other people's content. Facebook, on the other hand, is first and foremost, a content repository, not just an index. Having actual content is tremendously valuable in terms of stickiness. (Yes, google has gmail, apps, etc, but their revenue is still primarily driven by search.)
Finally, Facebook is, itself, a platform - in effect an operating system at web scale. It runs applications just like any operating system. This will also be incredibly important in the future. Microsoft dominated the PC industry because it was the platform of choice and had the most applications. iOS and Android currently dominate the mobile market because they are the platforms of choice and therefore have the most apps. Facebook is the first true web scale platform and has the first mover advantage (and a really big pile of cash because they valued their company *properly* and got maximum return from the IPO. That is, after all, what an IPO is for - to fund growth.) They are well positioned to be the platform of the next generation.
WRT privacy, that's easy. Don't put anything on Facebook that you don't want the world to see. Keep private stuff private. This is not new. Way back in 1999, Scott McNealy, then CEO of Sun Microsystems, famously observed "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."
Y-a-w-n. I hope twitter is not far behind, What COLOSSAL wastes of time.
Never been on it, didn't miss on anything and who wants to realty know about my life except my therapist.
And how they find the time? they need therapy more than me.
I never joined facebook, saw how much time others wasted on it....
From what Ive read and seen, facebook cant be trusted with personal info..?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Tuesday session on a lower note after generally upbeat earnings took the back seat to geopolitical concerns. The S&P 500 (-0.5%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.1%) ended on their lows, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) displayed relative strength.
Once again, market participants were focused on quarterly reports in the early going, but geopolitical worries overshadowed the impact of mostly better than expected earnings. Specifically, equities ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'