1/7/2013 9:15 PM ET|
Forget the cliff; beware the ceiling
For all the worry, the fiscal cliff was just a preview of the debt-ceiling ruckus ahead. Here's why that could be worse for investors -- and how to get through it.
You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The cliffhanger of a fiscal cliff deal was just a dress rehearsal for the late-January/early-February battle over raising the debt ceiling. This time it's worse -- and more worrisome for investors. This one could really move global markets -- and move them fast and hard, in the not-so-distant future. Here are three reasons why, plus a strategy for getting past it.
The crises ahead
This time the damage from missing the deadline for a deal sets in on Day One. The negative effects of not reaching a fiscal cliff deal on taxes and spending on Jan. 1 or thereabouts was never going to be immediate. In the fiscal cliff crisis, tax rates indeed would have gone up immediately, but tax payments would have increased gradually and spending cuts would have been phased in over time. The damage to the U.S. economy from a fiscal cliff failure would have been major -- perhaps enough to send the economy back into recession -- but it would have been felt only gradually. That's why economists, Wall Street pundits and politicians kept saying that it was possible to go over the cliff and still fix the problem before the economy suffered major damage. (This was the so-called bungee-cord strategy.)
That's not true of the debt-ceiling crisis. This time, the damage is likely to be big and immediate, and some of it won't be easily reversed.
This crisis is really three crises in one:
- Crisis No. 1 is the raising of the debt ceiling. If Congress doesn't raise the current $16.4 trillion debt ceiling, the Treasury can't increase net borrowing to pay the country's bills. In practice, the Treasury has ways to manage the country's debt levels so that it can pay U.S. obligations until, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, mid-February. After that, the Treasury would have to decide to pay some bills and not others. You can bet it would continue to pay the interest on U.S. debt, even if it had to raid other budget lines to do so. Default on U.S. debt obligations would throw the U.S. and the rest of the world into financial market chaos.
- Crisis No. 2 hits shortly after the Treasury runs out of room to finagle. The fiscal cliff deal put off $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts divided equally between defense spending and domestic discretionary spending -- this is what's called the sequester -- that were set to gradually take effect after Jan. 1, according to the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, which ended the most recent battle over the debt ceiling. (About $100 billion in automatic cuts would go into effect in the 2013 fiscal year that ends on Sept. 30.) The Jan. 1 fiscal cliff deal postponed the cuts until March 1. So, sometime in the next six to seven weeks, Congress will have to resolve the automatic budget cuts it has failed to address in a meaningful way in the past 18 months or so. Otherwise, federal spending gets whacked by $100 billion this year -- with more cuts to come. That's certainly enough to take a bite out of first-quarter growth in gross domestic product that economists already fear could dip to a rate of just 1%.
- Crisis No. 3 comes close on the heels of Crisis No. 2. The September 2012 continuing resolution that authorized spending by the federal government expires March 27. Unable to pass an actual budget or the appropriation and spending bills that go with it, our government in Washington has been operating under a continuing resolution that authorized spending for the first half of fiscal 2013. Unlike a failure to raise the debt ceiling -- which would lead to the government paying some bills and not others -- failure to extend the continuing resolution would mean that the federal government wouldn't have authority to spend any money. Here, we're looking at something that would actually shut down the federal government.
The two sides have already begun to double-down on their rhetoric. Congressional Democrats, afraid that President Barack Obama will negotiate spending cuts on entitlements including Social Security and Medicare, are urging the president to get tough. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said the president should invoke the 14th Amendment to raise the debt ceiling by presidential order. Section 4 of that amendment says, "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." Some constitutional lawyers -- along with some Congressional Democrats and some members of the Obama administration including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner -- have argued that this language makes the debt ceiling itself unconstitutional and gives the president the power to simply raise or ignore the debt ceiling. (So far, the White House, aware that such an assertion of power would provoke a constitutional crisis, has said it does not intend to invoke the 14th Amendment.)
On the Republican side, Senate and House leaders facing a revolt by conservative Republicans have declared any further tax increases off the table. On Sunday, Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said, "The tax issue is finished, over, completed." That will come as a surprise to a White House that is holding to its position that any spending cuts must be balanced 1-to-1 by tax increases. Such extreme positions seem to mark the beginning of negotiations in Washington these days. And the distance between these positions, even if they are rhetorical posturing, is certainly enough to make reaching any agreement a long and drawn-out affair with big potential to worry the market.
What the market fears
That potential to worry the market is what interests investors most. Here's how I'd handicap that worry.
From the fiscal cliff deal, we know that investors are inclined to assume that, against all evidence, politicians will find a compromise rather than wreck the economy or destroy the U.S. credit rating. I think in this case that means that the markets are likely to stay relatively optimistic until at least the fourth week in January.
How do I arrive at that? The next meeting of the Bank of Japan is set for Jan. 21 and 22, and the next meeting of the U.S. Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee is Jan. 29 and 30. The Bank of Japan is widely expected to cave in to pressure from the newly elected Liberal Democratic government and announce a big program of bond buying that would push inflation toward a goal of 2% and weaken the yen. Investors will be looking to the Fed meeting for signs that, after the fiscal cliff deal and with the looming uncertainty of the three February crises, the bank intends to keep its $85 billion-a-month program of economic stimulus (via quantitative easing) running at full throttle.
More from MoneyShow.com:
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Not fair to make judgment of this, until you see what the Fire Chief says!!!!
In South Los Angeles , a 4-plex home was destroyed by a fire.
A Mexican family of six, all welfare recipients and gang members,
Lived on the first floor, they died.
An Islamic group of seven welfare cheats,
All illegally in the countryfrom Kenya , lived on the second floor,
And they, too, all perished in thefire.
6 LA, Hispanic, ****ers, & ex-cons,
Lived on the 3rd floor and they, too, died.
A lone, white couple lived on the top floor.
The couple survived the fire.
Jesse Jackson, John Burris and Al Sharpton were furious!!
They flew into LA and met with the fire chief, on camera.
They loudly demanded to know,
Why the Blacks, Black Muslims and Hispanics,
All died in the fire and why only the White couple lived?
The Fire Chief said,
"They were at work"
I think what should be done is to establish some sort of retail chain store that only buys American-made goods.
Establish some sort of standard for "American-made", like a minimum of 80% of the labor cost & parts. Maybe organize something on Facebook to crowd-source financing for the company.
Imagine walking into a store where nothing says "Made in China".
The question was asked soooo, I will respond.
The Tea Party has no problem with ows people assembling in a peaceful manner......
WE DO HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN:
They assemble without permission on priivate or public property.
They assault people.
They damage public and private property.
They plot terrorist acts.
They threaten individuals and companys.
They don't clean up behind themselves.
They profess to want a freerider lifestyle on the taxpayers dime....
The New Era is
you have money, he will find it and steal it from you and then go vacation in Hawaii.
Both Dems and Repukes are not doing their job in controlling government cost.
Congress keeps talking about reducing and or removing so called entitlements. why don't we ever hear from these clowns that they will reduce their own compensation / medical packages first before they start screwing with the rest of us?? Clearly their own retirement packages that we pay for 100% should be the first piece to go. Then their salary and medical that we also pay for should be reduced especially in light of their non performance.
AND all this leads up to the big crash so that we can have one world currency. Hold onto your seats, it's comin'
You pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big screen TV while your
neighbor defaults on his mortgage (while buying iPhones, TV 's and new cars) and the
government forgives his debt and reduces his mortgage (with your tax dollars).
Everybody wants change, but as long as you vote the DEMONCRATS to hold the Senate--nothing will change. They hadn't passed a budget for over 4 years, and people STILL voted to keep them in. I call this the DUMBING of AMERICA---and it started with our EDUCATION SYSTEM!!!
Both parties are out of control, but the Democrats are more out of control when it comes to spending.
The past 3 presidents:
Clinton: 4.1 T - 5.7 T (1.6 T increase over 8 years)
GWBush: 5.7 T - 10.6 T (4.9 T increase over 8 years)
Obama: 10.6 T - 16.4 T and growing ( 5.8 T increase over 4 years)
If you breakdown the congress with Clinton:
1st 2 yrs DCrats: 4.1 T - 4.8 T (avg 350 B increase per year)
Last 6 yrs Repubs: 4.8 T - 5.7 T (avg 300 B increase per year)
If you breakdown the congress with GWBush:
1st 6 yrs Repubs: 5.7.1 T - 8.6 T (avg 500 B increase per year)
Last 2 yrs DCrats: 8.6 T - 10.6 T (avg 1 T increase per year)
The Democrats came back into power in 2007 and started a spending spree. From 1993 - 2006 the debt slightly more than doubled over those 14 years. In the 6 years since it will has doubled yet again (quadrupled in 20 years).
....16.4 Trillion in debt and the Dems STILL don't want to reduce expenses........
At what point do the Dumbocrats think they should reduce government expenses? All they talk about is raising taxes on the weathy who already pay 84.6% of the tax load for the entire United States!
Meanwhile the US spends $6 Billion per month on food stamps - which is a wide open to fraud. Take a look at the request form....it's geared for a 3rd grader to complete....and nobody checks income levels....it's on the honor system to list your net worth!! Oh my!!! This is a joke to the extreme.
Why not invoke the 14th Amendment? Another crisis on top of the ones already manufactured would be no bigger deal than what we're already facing. I say do it and let's see the scramble that ensues.
As Congress has shown us, it's not the results that count, it's the bickering along the way.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] There wasn't a lot of excitement in the stock market today and there is nothing wrong with that. After rallying in broad-based fashion on Friday, the major indices stood their ground (for the most part) amid a lack of conviction from buyers and sellers alike.
Today wasn't a case so much of the stock market going up as it was a case of some influential stocks going up to keep the major indices on a winning path. In fact, decliners were just about even with ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|