2/21/2013 3:15 AM ET|
Gas below $4, or Dow 14,000?
Central banks have fueled the markets with cheap money, but that means inflation -- and rising prices at the pump. The problem? For most of us, the gain isn't worth the pain.
We are in uncharted territory. And no, I'm not talking about a world in which "American Idol" no longer reigns supreme on the airwaves.
I'm talking about the fact that we're in our sixth calendar year of near-0% interest rates, with the Fed engaged in its fifth iteration of direct bond buying with an open-ended commitment to purchase $85 billion a month. I'm talking about the way the Japanese, who tend to lead the way on these things, are now talking about extreme forms of monetary-policy easing, unleashing fears of a global currency war.
I'm talking about easy money reigning supreme everywhere.
What has all this monetary malfeasance bought us? Sure, the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) 14,000. But we're also looking at shrinking returns from all this economic stimulation as rising prices pinch beleaguered consumers. Policymakers have a choice: They can use cheap money to keep the Dow pushing above 14,000, or they can have gas below $4 a gallon.
You can't have both for long, because cheap money means pricey gasoline, and the economy doesn't run well on premium. Here's why this choice is so critical.
Two roads diverge
The reason the Dow has surged is simple enough. As governments, companies and families try to get out of debt and control spending, policymakers are trying to keep the global economy moving. The effect is a stock market bubble.
It's a bubble not supported by the fundamentals. We've got an unemployment rate tracking back toward 8%, negative growth in the U.S. for the fourth quarter of 2012, new recessions in most of the rich-world economies and soaring government debt levels.
And now, gas prices have surged to new seasonal highs. Gas is pushing over $4 a gallon in much of the country and is already above $5 in California, and seasonality should push prices even higher.
While gas prices are only one of the many economic troubles we face -- add stagnant wages, record food stamp usage, depressed consumer sentiment, higher taxes and more – they're critical. Because, as we saw during similar energy price spikes in 2011 and 2012, the economy suffers when gas costs more than $4 a gallon, and so do stocks.
What central bankers are trying to do
I must admit, the central bankers and the politicians supporting them talk a good game. They say they are concerned about asset bubbles and financial instability. They say that if inflation gets out of control, they'll pull back.
Japan's new prime minister, Shinzo Abe, who set off talk about currency wars by aggressively pushing down the price of the Japanese yen by pressing for a higher inflation target out of the Bank of Japan, said over the weekend that policymakers must be vigilant against asset bubbles.
But he followed by saying the positive effects of monetary policy easing -- cheaper money -- include higher stock prices.
He added that if Japan doesn't get the results it's looking for, other unprecedented options might include the Bank of Japan printing yen and purchasing foreign bonds (such as U.S. Treasury debt) or using the money to directly affect the stock market. Both strategies would be designed to lower the value of the yen.
And if the Bank of Japan, which, like the Federal Reserve, is an institution largely independent of political influence, doesn't play along, Abe suggested it might lose that independence.
This is political meddling in currencies and interest rates on a scale not seen since the U.S. Federal Reserve separated from the Treasury in 1951.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Time has come now and the Fed is in the Red, time to recoup and the market ain't gonna like it.
If you don't believe the seventies are back ,take a look and see what happens when you have cheap money too long, history unfortunately has a tendency to repeat itself. Not enough seem to learn from it.
Just because the wars are winding down and we`ve added 6 million jobs with Obama
and the Dow is up 70% with Obama, that`s no reason to like him.After all, he`s not 100%
white and he was probably born on Mars.He winked at the crowd yesterday.That`s
what marxist do.
0% for big banks. Record profits and huge tax reduction for oil companies.
The people get screw over and over again and the ignorant people blames the president instead of voting their politicians out.
The rich will just get richer.
And for the idiots who think more drilling and more pipeline will lower gas price you people need to wash your face and stop going through life blinded.
OBAMA AND DEMOCRATS AND THEIR FING GREEN AGENDA HAS CAUSED THE HIGH ENERGY AND FOOD PRICES AND IF YOU
BIG DOPE LIBERAL OBAMANITES KEEP THINKING IT'S BIG OIL YOU ARE FING DOPES! HE PROMISED THIS 'CHANGE' AND HE'S
MAKING SURE ENERGY AND FOOD PRICES SKYROCKET TO PUSH HIS FAILED GREEN AGENDA! THAT'S FACT! OBAMACARE
IS ALREADY BROKE! THEY AREN'T TAKING APPLICATIONS FOR THOSE WITH NO INSURANCE OR PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS
CAUSE THE PROGRAM IS BROKE!!!! AND IT'S NOT EVEN UP AND RUNNING YET! YEAH OBAMACARE WILL BE GREAT! YEAH
OBAMA AND LEFT WING LIBERALS HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS! RAISE TAXES KEEP SPENDNING MONEY YOU DON'T HAVE GIVE
MORE FREEBIES TO LAZY ASSES AND ILLEGALS WHO WANT TO LIVE FREE ON THE HARD WORKING MIDDLE CLASS! YEAH
THAT'S A REAL GREAT PLAN! SOCIALISM HAS FAILED EVERYWHERE AND IT'S NOW TAKING DOWN AMERICA!
Better get cash heavy or be a good rider on the way down. The time is nigh.
Exxon pays 10s of billion in taxes because they are SO profitable and is over 93% owned by investment funds comprised of a lot of small private investors, including union funds.
They should be applauded for their success. Hope they make more.
Anyone that believes refiners will push capacity to the max in the name of providing cheap gas to consumers simply doesnt understand their business. I saw a news pundit, Charles gibson, try to get a refinery manager concede that for the good of the country he should push daily production to the point there woudnt be enough profit to do necessary maintainence but Gibson ignored his point because his agenda was to vilify theindustry as evil predators.
I grew up in the oil industy and most of my family was involved as service providers to the industry and worked in it all my adult life. While I dont know everything about it, I know a lot more than most. Media and the gas pump shape public perception which is mostly hype, lies or mis information. To imply as politicians often do and media, that drilling a well in 5000 ft of water is the same as an onshore well is ludicrous or that the required seismic and geology analysis required prior to seecting a drilling location is absurd.
Ignorance is the best friend of those trying to conjure up elaborate conspirarcies. Believe me, if oil companies could collude to gouge and manipulate prices, while not entirely innoncent , nat gas would have NEVER dropped below $7-$8 range.
Currently gasoline prices are about what they were in the 1930s adjusted for inflation-a miracle.
In europe it can be over $9/gal
Hey Mickey(82) you're so fine, you're so fine...
Natty is feed stock for much you mention. So much natty it's had production shut-in as they go for oil.
Downstream price is off of Brent; that's a big part of issue.
I wouldn't be p!ssed, except the crack-spread is best in ages; refiners stock doing fantastic. Come on!
So, I'm definitely in agreement with 'Planet of the Idiots'; "THIS IS A MAD-HOUSE"!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the Tuesday session near their lows with the Russell 2000 (-1.0%) leading the slide. The S&P 500 lost 0.5% with nine sectors ending in the red.
Equities indices started the day with modest gains and spent the first two hours of action in the neighborhood of their flat lines. Although the early trade lacked clear sector leadership, that could have been overlooked due to the strength among heavily-weighted sectors like health care (-0.3%), ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'