America's best- and worst-run states

The places and challenges are diverse, but each state government has to play the hand its dealt, meet the needs and balance the books. Here are the best and worst at that.

By 247 Wall St. Nov 28, 2012 11:29AM

Image: US currency © Steve Allen, Brand X, CorbisBy Michael B. Sauter, Alexander E. M. Hess, Samuel Weigley and Ashley C. Allen, 24/7 Wall St.


How well run are America’s 50 states? The answer depends a lot on where you live.


Every year, 24/7 Wall St. conducts an extensive survey of all of 50 states in America. Based on a review of data on financial health, standard of living and government services by state, we determine how well each state is managed.


For the first time this year, North Dakota is the best run. California is the worst run for the second year in a row. Read on for more top names in each category.


How states are tested

The successful management of a state is difficult to measure. Factors that affect its finances and population may be the result of decisions made years ago. A state’s difficulties can be caused by poor governance or by external factors, such as extreme weather.



A state with abundant natural resources should have an easier time balancing its budget than one starved for resources. Regional problems or the national decline of certain industries can destroy local economies. The subprime mortgage crisis, for example, disproportionately affected states with strong construction and real estate markets. Such factors can be easily identified and noted as possible causes for a state's poverty levels, unemployment, or strained coffers.


Despite this, it is the responsibility of each state to deal with the resources at its disposal. Each government must anticipate economic shifts, diversify its industries and attract new business. A state should be able to raise enough revenue to ensure the safety of its citizens and minimize hardship without spending more than it can prudently afford. Some states have historically done this much better than others.


To determine how well the states are run, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed hundreds of data sets from dozens of sources. We looked at each state’s debt, revenue, expenditure and deficit to determine how well it is managed fiscally. We reviewed taxes, exports and GDP growth, including a breakdown by sector, to identify how each state is managing its resources. We looked at poverty, income, unemployment, high school graduation, violent crime and foreclosure rates to measure if residents are prospering.


The best-run states have certain characteristics in common, as do the worst-run. The high-ranking states all have well-managed budgets. Each of the top 10 has a perfect, or near-perfect, credit rating from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, or both. Of the 10 worst-ranked, only three received top scores from one agency, and none from both. California is currently the only state rated A- by S&P, the lowest score given to any state. These poor-ranked states have high debt relative to both income and expenditure.


There is a strong correlation between well-educated populations and generally well-managed states. Of the 10 best-scoring states on our list, nine have among the highest percentages of adults with high school diplomas.



Employment is also closely correlated to how well a state is managed. The unemployment rates of most of the poorly ranked states are among the highest in the country. Nine of the ten best-ranked states had an unemployment rate of less than 7% in 2011. This includes North Dakota, which had the lowest rate in the country in 2011, at just 3.6%. The average unemployment rate nationwide was 8.9% in 2011.


These are the best- and worst-run states in America.

The best:


1. North Dakota

  • Debt per capita: $3,282 (22nd lowest)
  • Budget deficit: None
  • Unemployment: 3.5% (the lowest)
  • Median household income: $51,704 (20th highest)
  • Pct. below poverty line: 12.2% (13th lowest)

For the first time, North Dakota ranks as the best run state in the country. In recent years, North Dakota’s oil boom has transformed its economy. Last year, crude oil production rose 35%. As of August, 2012, it was the second-largest oil producer in the country. This was due to the use of hydraulic fracturing in the state’s Bakken shale formation. The oil and gas boom brought jobs to North Dakota, which had the nation’s lowest unemployment rate in 2011 at 3.5%, and economic growth. Between 2010 and 2011, North Dakota’s GDP jumped 7.6%, by far the largest increase in the nation. This growth has also increased home values, which rose a nation-leading 29% between 2006 and 2011. North Dakota and Montana are the only two states that have not reported a budget shortfall since fiscal 2009.


2. Wyoming

  • Debt per capita: $2,694 (18th lowest)
  • Budget deficit: 10.3% (32nd largest)
  • Unemployment: 6.0% (7th lowest)
  • Median household income: $56,322 (13th highest)
  • Pct. below poverty line: 11.3% (6th lowest)

Wyoming is not the best-run state in the nation this year. The drop is largely due to the state’s contracting economy. In 2011, GDP shrunk by 1.2%, more than any other state. As a whole, however, the state is a model of good management and a prospering population. The state is particularly efficient at managing its debt, owing the equivalent of just 20.4% of annual revenue in fiscal 2010. Wyoming also has a tax structure that, according to the Tax Foundation, is the nation’s most-favorable for businesses -- it does not have any corporate income taxes. The state has experienced an energy boom in recent years. The mining industry, which includes oil and gas extracting, accounted for 29.4% of the state’s GDP in 2011 alone, more than in any other state. As of last year, Wyoming’s poverty, home foreclosure, and unemployment rates were all among the lowest in the nation.


3. Nebraska

  • Debt per capita: $1,279 (2nd lowest)
  • Budget deficit: 9.7% (34th largest)
  • Unemployment: 4.4% (2nd lowest)
  • Median household income: $50,296 (22nd highest)
  • Pct. below poverty line: 13.1% (tied-15th lowest)

Last year, Nebraska had the second-lowest unemployment rate in the nation at 4.4%. In Lincoln, the state capital, the unemployment rate was 4%, lower than all metropolitan areas in the country, except Bismarck and Fargo in North Dakota. Although far from the nation’s wealthiest state -- median income was slightly lower than the U.S. median of $50,502 -- Nebraska’s economy is strong relative to the rest of the U.S. The state is one of the leading agricultural producers, with the sector accounting for 8.3% of the state’s GDP last year. The state also had the second-lowest debt per capita in the country in fiscal 2010, at $1,279, compared to an average of $3,614 for states nationwide.



The worst:


3. Illinois

  • Debt per capita: $4,790 (11th highest)
  • Budget deficit: 40.2% (2nd largest)
  • Unemployment: 9.8% (tied-10th highest)
  • Median household income: $53,234 (18th highest
  • Pct. below poverty line: 15.0% (25th highest)

Although many states have budget issues, Illinois’ faces among the biggest problems. In 2010, the state’s budget shortfall was more than 40% of its general fund, the second-highest of any state. Both S&P and Moody’s gave Illinois credit ratings that were the second-worst of all states. In addition, the state only funded 45% of its pension liability in 2010, the lowest percentage of any state. Governor Patrick Quinn has made the now-$85 billion pension gap a top priority for the new legislative session beginning in January.


2. Rhode Island

  • Debt per capita: $9,018 (3rd highest)
  • Budget deficit: 13.4% (28th largest)
  • Unemployment: 11.3% (3rd highest)
  • Median household income: $53,636 (17th highest)
  • Pct. below poverty line: 14.7% (24th lowest)

Rhode Island’s finances were a mess in fiscal 2010. The state had $9.5 billion in unpaid debts, which came to 107.2% of that year’s revenues.At more than $9,000 per person, it’s one of the largest debt burdens in the country. The state also funded less than half of its pension obligations, worse than all states except for Illinois. In 2010, in a spectacular example of fiscal mismanagement, the state guaranteed a $75 million loan to a video game company, which has since defaulted. With one of the nation’s slowest growth rates and the third-highest unemployment rate in the U.S., at 11.3%, Rhode Island’s economy performed poorly overall.


1. California

  • Debt per capita: $4,008 (18th highest)
  • Budget deficit: 20.7% (17th largest)
  • Unemployment: 11.7% (2nd highest)
  • Median household income: $57,287 (10th highest)
  • Pct. below poverty line: 16.6% (18th highest)

California is 24/7 Wall St.'s "Worst Run State" for the second year in a row. Due to high levels of debt, the state’s S&P credit rating is the worst of all states, while its Moody’s credit rating is the second-worst. Much of California’s fiscal woes involve the economic downturn. Home prices plunged by 33.6% between 2006 and 2011, worse than all states except for three. The state’s foreclosure rate and unemployment rate were the third- and second-highest in the country, respectively. But efforts to get finances on track are moving forward. State voters passed a ballot initiative to raise sales taxes as well as income taxes for people who make at least $250,000 a year. While median income is the 10th-highest in the country, the state also has one of the highest tax burdens on income. According to the Tax Foundation, the state also has the third-worst business tax climate in the country.


Click here to read all 50 best and worst run state at 24/7 Wall St.


Also at 4/7 Wall St.: The 12 Companies Paying Americans the Least




Nov 28, 2012 1:52PM

Interesting comparison of worst run (blues states) to best run (red states). Coincidence?

Nov 28, 2012 2:59PM
California voted for the same leaders again? And why? Because the state is full of lazy people who want hand outs... Sorry to say, but its true!
Nov 28, 2012 1:39PM

It's not surprising that Illinois is rated the worst run state. This is what happens when the people in one region (Chicago) don't have a lick of sense and keep electing the same party (Democrats) back into office. This state is run by a corrupt political machine and Mike Madigan who controls all legislation to come before the elected officials.

Until the people of Illinois start getting a more balanced state legislators with no one party controlling for decades as the Democrats have will this state ever run efficiently again. There is no excuse for our elected officials to keep spending more money then we have coming in. No excuse for having such an underfunded pension system as we have here in Illinois. No excuse for all the corruption we have seen over the years. No excuse why we don't have term limits on all elected positions.

There is just no excuse at all that all this is happening to Illinois as when Edgar was governor we had balanced budgets and this state ran smoothly.

Nov 28, 2012 1:58PM
sound about right to me. the bad ones are dema**** controlled
Nov 28, 2012 1:35PM
Governor Brown of CA will go down in history as an American terrorist and a blatant thief
Nov 28, 2012 3:46PM
We're all pretty happy here in Wyoming. :)
Nov 28, 2012 6:42PM
It's been said already I'm sure, but all 3 best - SOLID RED STATES. All 3 WORST... 2 out of the 3 are the BLUEST STATES in the USA.
Nov 28, 2012 10:10PM

.....Best run states are all GOP "RED"....worst run are blue - Dumbocratic.........


Your move Obama fans!!??

Nov 28, 2012 5:21PM
California is unequivocally the worst run state overall.  This is thanks to the tax crazy bastard democrats and Jackass Jerry Brown.  May they all die soon and get buried in the cess pool with Rose Bird.
Nov 28, 2012 10:19PM

..........California - two years in a row - selected as WORST governed state in America!!..............


And is a solid Democratic state - they have a Dem. governor, super majority Democratic in both their House and Senate.


Plus they have the HIGHEST TAXES in American.....Obama should be proud of such a socialist state as that's where all his Hollyweird actors live along with all the illegal mexicans that voted for him.


All Obama voters should look at California as that is the model for the rest of the US. Highest taxes in America.....and they are still ready to file bankruptcy!!

Nov 28, 2012 7:47PM
Denver Colorado is becoming another land of fruits and nuts.  Tax and spend left wing marxist now run what was at one time a great state, not a vacation land for illegals and pot heads.
Nov 28, 2012 11:18PM
When your heart is bigger then your wallet it usually ends up in a budget nightmare.  You can't pay for everyone who doesn't want to work and force the people who do want to work to pay for it.  Dems need to get a clue on that one.   I understand the people who actually can't work and I have no problem with helping them but the gravy train for the lazy and selfish has got to stop.
Disability is a joke and how some of these people get away with it is down right criminal.  Same thing for a lot of the illegals as well.   So much money being taken from the deserving for the people who deserve the least.

Nov 29, 2012 4:43AM
Why is it that the worst run state in the union, California, is also the most influential state in politics?  If LA and San Fran's ideas don't work on the state level, why would they work on the federal level?  Yet that is the direction this nation continues to head.
Nov 28, 2012 11:49PM
define FAILURE = CALI : a disgrace to modern man. 9.5% income tax and a $27 billion deficit! thats what happens when you pander to double dipper bureacrats, welfare rats, illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, setting 40k prisoners free, re-electing jerry the fairy! unbelievable
Nov 28, 2012 10:34PM
See? Liberals cannot even run a state at all. All they can run it is to the ground.
Nov 29, 2012 1:31AM
Welfare food stamps section 8 have turned calif into the laziest state. I thought we abolished slavery,it's alive and well with welfare, people are to stupid to realize it.

Democrats love slavery.
Nov 28, 2012 3:29PM
Just list the figgin states in one column that are balance in the black and put on a list next to it which are in the red.  Then out one side a list of the richest and the other side the poorest.  All you have given is fluff.  You never gave a list.
Nov 28, 2012 1:40PM
Nov 28, 2012 8:10PM
Leaving politics aside the three states run the best are rich in natural resources (two oil/gas/coal and one agricultural)  and they have low populations. This allows for quick changes to minimize unemployment and allow inflow money to cover government overhead. Two of the three worse states are also some of the most populous which shows that when things get screwed up it is much harder to turn the ship around.
Nov 28, 2012 2:46PM
Um, I have to seriously disagree with North Dakota's status as the "best run" state or even a "well run" state.  North Dakota is currently riding the uphill side of oil & gas development, which is a boom-and-bust industry.  As a resident of Alaska, I've seen BOTH sides of this.  North Dakota has no long-term plan for its oil & gas development - including no tax plan - so the state will accumulate no budget reserves to smooth out the inevitable bust that follows the boom.  Alaska is much better prepared for the bust cycle.  All North Dakota will be left with is unemployment and boarded up store-fronts.  To evaluate states whose economies are largely commidity-based - and therefore to a large extent, cyclical - one must look over a much longer term than just what is happening right now.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.



Quotes delayed at least 15 min


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages posted solid gains ahead of tomorrow's policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 rallied 0.8%, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) could not keep pace with the benchmark index.

Equity indices hovered near their flat lines during the first two hours of action, but surged in reaction to reports from the Wall Street Journal concerning tomorrow's FOMC statement. Specifically, Fed watcher Jon Hilsenrath indicated that the statement ... More


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.