6/17/2013 6:45 PM ET|
Next bust creeps a little closer
While the financial system appears inoculated against a global crisis, emerging markets are increasingly vulnerable. And there's at least one scenario in which a local crunch could trigger a global crisis.
How near is the next bust? I raised this question a month ago, and concluded . . . not very.
I haven't completely changed my mind, but . . .
• I'm still convinced that a bust of the magnitude of the global financial crisis that followed the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy is very unlikely.
• I hear the growls from the bears that say we're looking at a replay of the Asian currency crisis of 1997. I think a replay is very unlikely. Something like a smaller version of that crisis does seem to me to be more possible than it was a month ago, though. Emerging stock markets will bear the brunt of that smaller version -- and I don't think the decline in those markets is over yet.
• The biggest danger of a global crisis remains the eurozone banking system, and that danger is largely overlooked by the current market.
The Asian currency crisis of 1997 is a good place to start any examination of the risks in this market.
I don't see a replay of the crisis that took Thailand's stock market down 75% in 1997, that resulted in a 13.5% drop in Indonesia's GDP, or that required a $40 billion effort from the International Monetary Fund to stabilize the currencies of South Korea, Thailand and Indonesia. But I do see a way that a re-emergence of some of the conditions of that crisis could cost a different cast of characters; Brazil, India and Turkey are more likely participants in this version than South Korea or Indonesia are. And the cost could be a retreat of an additional 15% or 20% in stock prices.
In other words, a deep, painful but selective bear market in emerging stock markets rather than a global financial crisis.
Been through this before
Unless the world's central banks make huge errors, a crisis of that dimension wouldn't take down the global economy or global financial markets. And while I wouldn't rule out such errors, they are unlikely. The scenario we're looking at is one the central banks have been through before and that they have traditional tools to handle. But a crisis of that dimension, especially one with its echoes of 1997, is enough to produce confidence-shaking volatility that will test central banks, traders and investors.
The preconditions for the Asian currency crisis were the devaluation of the Chinese renminbi and the Japanese yen, along with an increase in U.S. interest rates. Those forces put pressure on the currencies and financial markets of countries, such as Thailand, that were running current-account deficits and were dependent on cash inflows from overseas investors to balance accounts. When money stopped flowing in and instead started flowing out and into the United States in order to take advantage of higher interest rates, the financial positions and currencies of these countries started to come unraveled.
At that point, some Asian countries had adopted fixed exchange rates in an effort to keep their export economies running at top speed by making sure that an appreciating currency didn't make the cost of Thai or Indonesian or Korean or Philippine goods more expensive for customers in the United States, Japan and China. The exchange rate with China was extremely sensitive, because many Southeast Asian companies exported semi-finished goods to China for further manufacturing and export to the United States and Europe.
But as cash flowed out of those economies and currencies, it quickly became not a question of preventing these currencies from appreciating but of preventing their collapse.
Traders can count; looking at the reserves of foreign exchange and the current-account deficits in those countries, they bet that central banks and governments wouldn't be able to defend the value of their currencies.
And indeed they couldn't. The Philippine peso, for example, went from 26 to the U.S. dollar in 1997 to 38 to the dollar in mid-1999. The Korean won and the Hong Kong dollar came under attack. The volatility was scary enough by itself: Hong Kong's Hang Seng stock market index fell 23% from Oct. 20 to Oct. 24, 1997. Finally, the Thai baht collapsed, taking the Thai stock market with it. Thai stocks fell 75% in 1997. With financial markets essentially shut and currencies collapsing, economies ground to a halt for a lack of financing. The Indonesian economy contracted by 13.5% in 1998.
The International Monetary Fund and global central banks finally stepped in to guarantee liquidity in those markets, but not before the crisis had spread to China. The Chinese government and the People's Bank of China had to take extraordinary steps to guarantee the solvency of the country's banks as a tide of bad loans swept through the economy.
Echoes of an earlier crisis
With that history, you can see why raising the specter of the Asian currency crisis might be so scary right now.
There are echoes of the crisis in the drop in the yen that stretched from early November 2012 to mid-May. From Nov. 12 to May 16, the yen dropped 28.6%. Further, U.S. interest rates have started to rise: in the past month, the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasurys has climbed to 2.14% from 1.88%, an increase of 13.8%. Countries with chronic current-account deficits, such as Indonesia and India, have moved to slow outflows and defend their currencies by moves such as raising interest rates.
Certainly, spots of danger seem reminiscent of 1997. Indonesia and Turkey, two of the hottest emerging markets of 2012, are heavily dependent on foreign cash flows, and they've both seen big outflows of foreign cash in recent weeks. (Violence in the streets of Istanbul hasn't helped Turkish markets.) Brazil looks like it's in trouble, with cash flows out of the country picking up at the same time as the economy is slowing. That, of course, makes it hard for the Banco Central do Brasil to raise interest rates, although with inflation at 6.5% in May, near the top of the bank's range of 4.5% plus or minus two percentage points, the bank is likely to have to raise interest rates sooner rather than later no matter how slow the economy.
And, of course, Japan, with an estimated debt-to-gross domestic product ratio of 224% in 2012, is clearly nowhere near a sustainable level of debt.
But the differences with 1997 are significant. To me, they add up to volatility, further slowing in the global economy (and causing a significant drop in growth in some developing economies), a further drop in the price of emerging market stocks and big cash flows out of emerging market debt. But as painful as these market retreats as likely to be, they don't equal the kind of threat to global financial markets and economies we saw in the Asian currency crisis. (Not everyone agrees with me. You can get a good statement of the bear case in this interview with Albert Edwards of Societe Generale.)
What's different? Developing economies are, by and large, in better shape to weather a currency/overseas cash flow crisis than they were in 1997.
Asian currencies that were pegged to the dollar or to some basket of currencies in 1997 now float with relative freedom. That has made adjustment to changing market and economic conditions a gradual process rather than leaving any change to one big crisis. Foreign-exchange reserves are higher than they were in 1997. For example, as of May, Indonesia had foreign exchange reserves equal to 5.8 months of payments on its export bill, versus 3.9 months in 1997. The biggest swing is in South Korea, which had $329 billion in reserves as of April 2013, versus just $8.9 billion in December 1997.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
For Regal, Koo, Max, & all other devotee's to Obama:
HIS APPROVAL RATING IS DOWN TO 45% !
WHERE I WENT TO SCHOOL, WE CALL THAT FAILING !!
Pretty much the western economic system insures that there will be a collapse and sooner rather than later. It is built into the system. Look Japan is bankrupt, Europe is bankrupt, USA is bankrupt because all these countries use a privately held central banking system that lives off debt.
That debt has now gotten so large that the central banks have to pump trillions of dollars into the system just to service the debt. At a time when the average income in these countries is going down at a remarkable pace.
It is a clear recipe for total disaster.
Add in the fact that all three have aging and retiring populations and you can see the stock market and bond market and commodity markets in these countries will have to go down as the retired people take money out to live on in an ever increasingly expensive world.
Add in the fact that the BRICS have abandoned the dollar as a trading currency and I can not see the western banking system lasting past Sept 13 2015.
The market seems to be very sensitive to any talk of tapering. This tells me the whole global market is on a hair-trigger. We can't keep financing a bloated US government through QE forever. Sometime, the market start to loose faith in the policy. So, something will have to give sooner or later.
I don't know if it will be a crisis or a bump.
The dollar is slowly losing it's power worldwide. When and if it continues to go down, and the switch is made to purchase another currency by our international investors, there will be a huge crash!!
We can't continue to print more and more dollars. They will be worthless!!!!
Ireland = 30 people in Momma Docs entourage !
Only 30 !!
Each room = $3,300 per night !
50 million on food stamps ?
The Doc family (and Grandma moocher) living large , real large !
Let them eat cake !
One after another . All a misuse of power and trust.
All those campaign lies , none of them came to pass
Let me hear how YOU defend them ?
Oouch !!! Papa Doc going down !!
approval ratings sinking like a rock !
MR.Fat cat: I didn`t think I`ld ever agree with you.99% of these people who are bearist missed the
bull market and they`re very bitter.They blame Bernanke or Obama, but they should blame themselves
for missing the Dow`s run from 6500 to 15,200.Bitterness is a terrible pill.
....wants QE ends, the market will likely go down 3000+ pts......
The only unanswered question is what the exact date is!!
Americans seemly incapable of learning from the negative experiences of other countries. "The Bank of Japan had for many years, and as late as February 2001, claimed that "quantitative easing … is not effective" and rejected its use for monetary policy." [Wikipedia]
Saying it doesn't make it so,
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: +11.80. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: +6.00. The stock market is on track to begin today's session on a higher note following a better-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report for February (175K actual, 163K Briefing.com consensus). The S&P 500 futures trade 12 points above fair value with the bulk of the gain coming after the jobs report.
Over the last several weeks, economists have pointed toward the winter weather as the reason for ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'