SeaTac businesses stung by $15-an-hour pay
The minimum wage in this Washington city will rise to the highest in the nation next month. 'We are running pretty thin as it is,' a hotel manager says.
With 40 employees and less than $5 million in annual revenue, the franchise hotel in SeaTac, Wash., could be the typical American small business. But the Holiday Inn Express will soon have to give most of its staff pay raises that are anything but routine.
Officials in SeaTac, which is 10 square miles nestled between Seattle and Tacoma and consists of an airport and its surroundings, confirmed this month that it will raise the minimum wage for many workers to $15 an hour starting in January. That's a 63% increase and the highest municipal minimum wage in the nation.
SeaTac is an extreme example of the mounting labor costs facing employers nationwide, and it may serve as a controlled experiment on the impact of a significant wage hike in a small community.
Elsewhere in Washington state, employers already pay $9.19 an hour, the highest state minimum wage in the country, and that amount will rise 13 cents next month. In January, Oregon's hourly minimum will climb to $9.10, New York's to $8.75 and Vermont's to $8.73. Among municipalities, San Francisco currently has the highest minimum wage, at $10.55, which will increase to $10.74 next month.
"We are running pretty thin as it is so we cannot eliminate positions," he says. Increasing the price of a room is too risky, he adds. "I cannot go around changing prices without my competition [also] changing them. . . . We'll have to make less money I guess."
Kim says he is putting plans to build a fourth hotel property in SeaTac on hold. "We are waiting to see how things are going to pan out," he says.
The issue is of particular concern for small employers, which often complain that they operate on thinner margins than their large counterparts. Some economists say a higher minimum wage prompts small firms to reduce workers' hours and scale back hiring, while others argue it improves employee retention and results in increased consumer spending.
President Barack Obama has backed raising the federal minimum to $10.10 an hour, from its current $7.25, by 2015. That proposal would raise the wages of about 30 million workers, who would receive more than $51 billion in additional pay over the phase-in period, according to a March report from the Economic Policy Institute.
Mike Condon says his SeaTac coffee shop won't be required to comply with the city's new $15-an-hour minimum, which applies only to hospitality and transportation workers and excludes airlines and small businesses with fewer than 25 employees.
But he expects the higher rate to make it harder for him to recruit and retain entry-level workers. "Employees of my own that are well trained can go over to these jobs at the airport now and make more money than I can possibly pay them," he says. "With our margins, I would not be able to match those salaries and stay in business."
Most employers in SeaTac can't easily relocate. "We are left with no choice but to make the best of it," says Scott Ostrander, general manager of Cedar Brook Lodge, a boutique hotel in SeaTac with less than $10 million in annual revenue. Of its 117 employees, about 70% earn less than $15 an hour and will get automatic raises next year.
"We sit on 18 acres of naturally restored wetland. It's not like we can just pick up all 18 acres and move," he says.
About 28% of 599 small businesses across the U.S. with annual revenue of $1 million to $20 million said they support raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 an hour, according to a survey this week by The Wall Street Journal and Vistage International; 65% were opposed and 7% selected "other."
"There are businesses that sell to low-wage earners, and so an increase in their income could translate into an increase in their business," says Richard Curtin, a research professor at the University of Michigan.
Last Thursday, fast-food workers launched protests in cities across the country, calling for higher pay and saying they can't survive on minimum-wage income. Melinda Topel, 42 years old, who makes the $7.35-an-hour minimum wage at a McDonald's franchise in Kansas City, Mo., recently went on strike seeking $15 an hour.
Asked whether a higher wage would cause her to lose hours or her job, she said: "I'm not afraid of that. McDonald's Corp. makes billions of dollars a year, thousands of dollars an hour. They can afford to pay us what we deserve."
If the minimum wage is raised, "it would help me where I can pay my rent and my utilities. I would be able to buy shoes for my kids for school, to buy clothes that they need for school, winter jackets. I wouldn't have to worry about whether or not my kids are cold, or if my lights are going to get turned off."
A McDonald's (MCD) spokeswoman said via email that the company offers its employees competitive pay and benefits.
Rondell Johnson, 23, earns the minimum in Pennsylvania, $7.25 an hour, working as a baggage handler for airport subcontractor PrimeFlight at Philadelphia International Airport.
"It's a headache. You really can't do nothing. You work to pay bills," he says, adding that he would "move tomorrow" to a city like SeaTac because of the city's significantly higher starting-pay requirements. PrimeFlight declined to comment.
Gary Gerber, founder and owner of Sun Light & Power, in Berkeley, Calif., starts his entry-level workers at $15 an hour or more and believes that arguments against a higher minimum wage are "probably being greatly over-blown." He says: "What's going to happen is the raising of the wage will pump a bunch more money into the economy."
Mr. Gerber's company, which designs and installs solar-electric and solar-hot-water systems, has 65 employees and about $14 million in annual revenue. The minimum wage in California is $8 an hour, and it's slated to increase to $9 next July. "You're going to get better quality employees if you pay better," he says.
Frank and Sydne Albanese, co-owners of a small café in downtown Seattle since 2003, say that over the years they have come up with strategies for coping with minimum-wage increases.
For example, they maintain a "skeleton crew" of just five minimum-wage earners and keep their inventory as lean as possible. "Excess inventory just means dollars are sitting in your back room," says Mr. Albanese.
- Startup Offers Same-Day Delivery at Shopping Malls
- Hair Chain Drybar Finds Niche in Affordable Luxury
- Tips on Building a Franchising Empire
From the story: "You're going to get better quality employees if you pay better," ....
Of course, and then all the idiot, slacker, nearly brain-dead ones who are demanding to be paid $15 an hour will find themselves unemployed because higher caliber people will replace them. Why don't libs think these things through first?
Implementing $15.00 per hour as minimum wage will create a permanent class of unemployable people.
When businesses are forced into this corner 2 things wll happen
1. Staffing sizes will be cut
2. People hired will be smarter and better qualified than the current employee base as employers will be very picky as to who is hired The solution will be baby boomers
Organizations like Walmart, Home Depot, Lowes etc wil replace their entire work force with retiring baby boomers who are educated, have a good work ethic, can speak decent english, have some common sense and want to work a few days per week to make some pocket change. 15/hr * 16 hrs per week *4 weeks = $960 per month for 2 days per week.
The basic high school graduate , no skill , adult who wants to work will not find employment so we'll continue to support them via subsidies.
Also, the current workforce who does get a bump will theoretically see their current subsidies cut. When that happens they'll scream, and the GOVT wil simply raise the amount that can be earned to qualify for subsidies and in doing so keep their voter base happy so they get re-elected. Anyway you twist this it will cost tax payers more
What some people don't get (referring to the fast food employees push for higher wages), is that if they start getting $15/hour as they are demanding, the pool of employees who'll want to work in those installations skyrockets, and they have a tripe or more chance to lose their jobs.
For example... let's take the typical unskilled McDonald worker who's normally not paying attention to the customers and talking personal business with his co-workers, instead of doing what they are paid for (giving the customer their undivided attention). Then let's say someone who's currently getting paid $12/hour working for a customer service company. If that person comes and applies for a job at that McDonalds, it would be smart for the manager/owner to hire the newcomer and let go the previous employee.
In other words, the competition for those jobs will increase dramatically and those with higher skills and better resumes will get them; leaving those that are DEMANDING higher pay out in the cold and without a job.
(This is a bit away from what this article is talking about, but I wanted to make a comment on that).
Regarding this article... I expect a few people to be let go in the SeaTac are... luckily for the employees on the above mentioned hotel, they were already thin on workforce.
Here's something we all have to consider ... the world is not made up of only McDonalds and "small" businesses grossing $5 Million. The businesses that will cease to exist are the much more common employer with 10-20 employees doing half a million or less in gross revenues. These businesses will not survive ... period ... and along with their demise will go thousands and thousands of jobs that are currently helping to pay the bills in thousands of households. Now consider that $15 per hour is proposed for the jobs at the bottom of the food chain. What are you going to propose we do with the folks that are already earning $15 - $20 per hour? The answer cannot be to make the lowest skill jobs pay more. The answer lies in providing means for folks to increase their skills with more training and education so they will qualify for jobs that have higher value. This is just another level of entitlement that will come back to haunt more people than it will help.
For those of you not familiar with SeaTac, it's a crappy area next to the airport where the hotels are always cheaper due to the less than desirable environs. Now, if those establishments have to raise their rates to stay profitable, the hotels in the surrounding areas will profit greatly. To you dimwitted liberals, it's not a zero sum game.
This is all because this country gave away far to many manufacturing jobs. The factory workers, design, sales, and office jobs that went out the door along with the factory jobs is killing this nation. So now to try and make up for this mess people that are underemployed are trying to make a living with jobs that were intended for high school kids or retirees trying to make some suplimental income.
Thanks to our polititions. What ding-a-lings!
As usual people can't look farther than their nose. Go on get your raise, You have now become like our government. Stimulate the economy by printing more money (and spend it), which raises the price of everything. You, the recipient of a $15 raise will spend more which will do the same thing (raise prices) and you will be back to complaining you can't make ends meet. Read a book on economics and you will understand.
If you don't like what you are getting paid, change jobs, get an education, get smarted than the next guy. Complaining about a problem and not doing anything sounds like you want it all but are afraid to do anything about it.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages posted solid gains ahead of tomorrow's policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 rallied 0.8%, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) could not keep pace with the benchmark index.
Equity indices hovered near their flat lines during the first two hours of action, but surged in reaction to reports from the Wall Street Journal concerning tomorrow's FOMC statement. Specifically, Fed watcher Jon Hilsenrath indicated that the statement ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'