Facebook's Zuckerberg buys his privacy for $30M
The CEO snaps up 4 homes near his and leases them to their current residents, all to avoid prying eyes.
Facebook (FB) just made it even harder to keep your activities private, but its founder just spent tens of millions of dollars to avoid prying eyes.
According to the San Jose Mercury News (hat tip to Business Insider), Mark Zuckerberg found out that a developer was promoting a neighboring house with his name. It's an understandably creepy invasion of privacy. I wouldn't want my name and location used to sell a home -- or any other goods or services -- unless I'm fairly compensated for it.
Zuckerberg's response was to buy four surrounding homes and lease them to their current residents. This is in Palo Alto's Crescent Park neighborhood, where Zillow finds homes going for an average of $3 million, up 21% year over year, so this wasn't cheap. The Facebook founder spent $30 million for the houses adjacent to his modest home. One neighbor demanded $14 million.
Google (GOOG) founder Larry Page pulled a similar stunt so he could build a sprawling mansion (sorry, no Google Island just yet).
Sound a little ironic?
We see so many headlines on Facebook's slowly loosening privacy rules that, at this point, it just registers as white noise. But today, privacy-conscious users are upset over the social network's dismantling of a feature that allows you to stay invisible in search.
Chief Privacy Officer Michael Richter said yesterday that the change, which was hinted at a year ago, will begin to go into effect soon. Currently, about 10% of users, which would be equivalent to the 12th most populous country in the world if they all got together, limit those who can search for them by name to "friends of friends." Richter says that though your identity will not be hidden, you can still choose who gets to see what's in your profile.
Earlier this year, Facebook released Graph Search, which allows you to search for people without knowing exactly who you are looking for. Naturally, this could get dicey with everyone -- including government officials, law enforcers, and wrongdoers -- having easy access to lists of "married people who like prostitutes," "family members of people who live in China and like Falun Gong," and "Islamic men interested in men who live in Tehran, Iran"
Users of Facebook and Google products are getting used to the idea that what happens in your personal life online doesn't necessarily stay private, especially after the Edward Snowden leaks that revealed back doors for the government peeking at major websites. If you want a low profile, you have little choice but to just stay off social networking sites. And if you want to get rich enough to buy your privacy, buy up some Silicon Valley real estate while the getting is good.
More from Minyanville
- Apple's iPhone Rollout, Samsung's Fingerprint Fakeout
- Credit Concerns Emerge and Gold Breaks Down
- Wal-Mart, Gap Continue to Notch Up Death Tolls
The sheople have given him that money by embracing his business model so who are the stupid ones?
Won't find me on FB.
I have a life, AND don't need to advertise that to anyone.
"If you want a low profile, you have little choice but to just stay off social networking sites."
The easiest choice anyone will ever make.
Just another hypocrite proving to everyone in the world how trickle down economics doesn't work. The rich only do one thing with their wealth generated by their workforce.
Spend it on everything BUT the people who generate their billions. And I imagine you can find a quote from this punk bitching about how he needs tax credits and welfare for the rich because of his supreme awesomeness
This &%* isn't even WORTH the space of this article. Pathetic it is even news worthy.
This shows how incredibly stupid this moron is. Anyone who would buy real estate in California, is just as stupid.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the Tuesday session near their lows with the Russell 2000 (-1.0%) leading the slide. The S&P 500 lost 0.5% with nine sectors ending in the red.
Equities indices started the day with modest gains and spent the first two hours of action in the neighborhood of their flat lines. Although the early trade lacked clear sector leadership, that could have been overlooked due to the strength among heavily-weighted sectors like health care (-0.3%), ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'