Nasdaq may cross 4,000 for the first time in 13 years

The tech-heavy index was at about 3,981 Monday. It's become a grown-up version of its former self.

By MSN Money Partner Nov 18, 2013 3:22PM

Image: Dollar sign on keyboard (© Corbis)By Steven Russolillo, The Wall Street Journal

The Nasdaq Composite ($COMPX) is a far more mature version of its former self.

The tech-heavy index is poised to cross 4,000 for the first time in 13 years, a development that has stoked concerns another tech-bubble is forming. But the Nasdaq nowadays has more dividend payers, fewer dot-coms and a more reasonable valuation, a nod to the evolution of an index once only known for tech and growth stocks.

Currently, 51 of the top 100 Nasdaq stocks -- including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) -- pay dividends. (Microsoft owns and publishes MSN Money.) In December 1999, when the Nasdaq initially jumped above 4,000, only nine companies paid dividends, according to stock market research firm Birinyi Associates.

Between dividend increases and bigger share buybacks, the increase of shareholder-friendly moves in recent years have helped juice the Nasdaq as it approaches 4,000. The index currently sports a dividend yield of 1.41%, compared to 0.11% in December 1999. The S&P 500′s dividend yield is 1.91%.

Apple, which started paying a regular dividend last year, is illustrative of the Nasdaq’s trend. The iPhone and iPad maker has transformed from a high-flying growth stock to one that’s more characteristic of a plodding value stock over the past year, a fate similar to the likes of Microsoft, Cisco and Intel (INTC).

The Nasdaq finished Friday at 3985.87, its highest close since September 2000. It has risen in eight of the past 11 weeks and is up 32% this year, outpacing both the Dow and S&P 500.

Beyond dividends, there are other characteristics that show the differences between then and now. In 1999, there were 119 companies in the Nasdaq that had “.com” in their name. Now, there are 15.

And the Nasdaq now trades at about 25 times the previous year’s earnings, compared with 151 times trailing earnings in December 1999, Birinyi says.

In 1999, stocks were in a bubble. Now, the evidence isn’t as convincing.

More from The Wall Street Journal

Nov 19, 2013 8:27AM
And it is just as fake now as it was then. Only this time for a different reason.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.



Quotes delayed at least 15 min


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).

Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.