Oracle blamed for terrible Oregon Obamacare site

The state's portal cost $43 million to develop and hasn't signed up a single person. Officials are blasting the company for what's being called a 'disaster zone.'

By MSN Money Partner Nov 27, 2013 2:05PM

Image: Man with laptop (© Comstock Images/Jupiterimages)By Julie Bort, Business Insider

 

Oracle (ORCL) is being publicly flogged for Oregon's dysfunctional Affordable Care Act website. 

 

The website has been called "the worst disaster zone" in the Obamacare’s roll out" by The Washington Post's Ezra Klein.

 

That's because the state's website cost $43 million ($1.7 million over budget) and hasn't been able to sign up a single person. Worse still, it might not be working until after the March 31 deadline for enrolling in health care.

 

So said the Oregon executive responsible for the state's rollout, Rocky King, in a hearing last week, as reported by Blue Oregon's Kari Chisholm.

 

Cover Oregon board member Ken Allen blasted Oracle at the hearing, saying:

This is their failure. . . Their dates have shifted and shifted and shifted. . . The Cover Oregon staff are tremendously dedicated folks who have worked really hard. . . All of that good will and support from the business community is being frittered away because Oracle didn’t get it online. It’s 98% Oracle’s screw up.

Meanwhile, Oregon hired 400 temp workers to process paper applications by hand, so that people who apply for coverage by Dec. 15 will have coverage by Jan. 1, Allen said.

Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley blasted Oracle on television, too.

 

When NBC's Chuck Todd asked him on Friday if he could explain the problems with Oregon's health care rollout, he answered  "Yes. Oracle."

 

And he let that word hang in the air until Todd asked him for details. Then Merkley said:

Oracle was contracted to write the exchange. They promised it would be fully delivered on time, it would be beautiful and do more than any other exchange in the country, and it's in complete dysfunction. So we had to return to paper applications.

 

The irony of this situation is that Oracle is one of the Silicon Valley companies that the Obama administration has called in to help fix the disastrous federal website.

 

We asked Oracle if it had any response, or any explanation for Oregon's website problems. Oracle had no comment.

 

More from Business Insider

Tags: ORCL
52Comments
Nov 27, 2013 2:26PM
avatar
Obama Hussein has spent over a billion $'s on advertising for this albatross.
Obama care isn't about health care, it's a political movement.

And, you lose.

Nov 27, 2013 2:49PM
avatar
The problem is the entire ACA law...  Remember to pay back the democrats next November.  They caused this mess...
Nov 27, 2013 3:12PM
avatar

It is back to the blame game.  As a resident of Oregon and retired procurement professional  I can tell you the state has little expertise in this area.  But the bottom line is the State is ultimately responsible for managing their supplier(s).  Senator Merkely is noting but a political shill for the Democratic party.  He has been totally behind the ACA ignoring problem areas and pleas from citizens to delay the implementation until recently.  Now that problems are being escalated in the press threatening his re-election in 2014 he has suddenly become more vocal.   Oregonians replace this hypocrite in 2014.  We need legislators who read and understand bills before voting them into law.

Nov 27, 2013 3:00PM
avatar
Naaaaa... The real problem is Bush keeps hacking the web site...  Waaaaaaaaaaaaa !!
Nov 27, 2013 3:03PM
avatar
It's not my FAULT            BUSH DID IT !!!!!!

I mean the CIA
I mean the IRS
I mean the HHS
I mean the  justice dept
I mean the state dept
I mean the REPUBLICANS
I mean the HOUSE
I mean the Sente
 YOU GET THE DRIFT

Nov 27, 2013 3:01PM
avatar
It just shows that democrats cannot run anything right even in their own democratic states.
Nov 27, 2013 3:12PM
avatar
So what is the Cost Per Unit?  You can't divide by 0. 

Is anybody adding up ALL the individual states' IT expenditures + future IT maintenance expenses + federal government IT development and IT expenses.  And, that's just the IT expenditures.  Then, what the individual policy holder is going to pay in increased expenditures.  Mine would have increased a mere 93% - God only knows what it will increase to come January 1, 2015.

Think there might be some additional tax increases to help pay for all this "progressive" stuff?  It's definitely coming out of somebody's hide.  Maybe they'll just tax those evil rich people and they will take care of the rest of us.  This whole thing just keeps getting better and better.

Nov 27, 2013 3:17PM
avatar
It's more likely the government officials  managing the project for the state kept changing the requirements. That's what I found when I used to work for state run projects. Completion was a moving target that could never be met and the blame was always shifted toward us.
Nov 27, 2013 3:34PM
avatar
In contracting, there is a standard clause that intelligent parties insist on, called a "Specific Performance Clause".  It gives the contracting party legal remedies against a contractor that fails to perform the terms of the contract.  It appears that the Oregon executives responsible for "Cover Oregon" and their legal advisors need a course in Contract Law 101.

But then again, maybe they are just following the lead set by Obamacare and the Federal exchange website contract.  

After all, it's not their money being pis*** away.
Nov 27, 2013 3:09PM
avatar
If Ezra Klien said it, it has to be true. Wait a minute, was he part of the left wing press that was called into the White House for reeducation? I bet he misses his show that got axed on MSNBC for lack of ratings!
Nov 27, 2013 3:22PM
avatar
This is just to funny what a complete mess.  
Nov 27, 2013 3:23PM
avatar
Does anyone know how many votes in the Senate you need to override a Presidents veto?  That's what we need guys.
Nov 27, 2013 3:25PM
avatar
I think there should be a new resume category for employment in the Obama Administration and the State of Oregon: Works well with blaming others.
Nov 27, 2013 3:06PM
avatar
 what a joke ordebacle is.... my kid could fix this site for 40 million
Nov 27, 2013 3:37PM
avatar
TOM SMITH
Does anyone know how many votes in the Senate you need to override a Presidents veto?  That's what we need guys.
2/3   EACH HOUSE
Nov 27, 2013 3:43PM
avatar
The only thing they're delaying is it's, Odumbocare, exit right out the door.  Ever dem need to go this coming yr. GONE!
Nov 27, 2013 4:09PM
avatar
Simple truths are hard for arrogant people to understand.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.


Nov 27, 2013 4:18PM
avatar
T J K 

I was not aware that healthcare was broken prior to Obama's arrival. Yes it could use some adjustments such as tort reform, abilities to sell  policies across state lines, and keeping the lobbyist out of DC.
 This is nothing more than a power grab by the Democratic Party to control one 5th of the economy.

 The Democrats will pay the price in 2014 midterms.
 The Republican and tea party were smart enough to distance themselves.                                               But as a true  socialist you approve.
 Social Security and Medicare will be broke within 20 years, this is due to both parties  RAIDING THE COOKIE JAR
THE ACA   will be a SLUSH FUND for the Democratic Party. 
Nov 27, 2013 4:31PM
avatar
M COATS          HERE YA GO,,,,,,,,NEXT TIME DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH


90 million AMERICANS are gonna be pissed off in less than 1 year,,,,they did not want it,,,,but they got it
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-23/a-serious-republican-health-care-plan.h​tml

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/GOPHea​lthPlan_061709.pdf


(Reuters) - President  would veto a bill sponsored by a Republican congressman that would allow insurers to offer healthcare plans slated to be canceled because they do not meet the new U.S. healthcare law's standards, the White House said on Thursday.

The veto threat came hours after Obama, under fire for the botched roll-out of his signature domestic policy achievement, said health insurers could extend by at least one year policies that were due to be canceled because they do not comply with new minimum requirements.

The White House has said previously that the bill, sponsored by Representative Fred Upton of Michigan, would undermine the law known as Obamacare because it would allow plans that had been canceled to be sold to anyone, not just people who wanted to renew their existing plans.

The bill "rolls back the progress made by allowing insurers to continue to sell new plans that deploy practices such as not offering coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, charging women more than men, and continuing yearly caps on the amount of care that enrollees receive," the White House said in a statement on Thursday.

"The administration supports policies that allow people to keep the health plans that they have. But, policies that reverse the progress made to extend quality, affordable coverage to millions of uninsured, hard-working, middle-class families are not the solution," it said.

Upton is the chair of the House of Representatives' energy and commerce committee and a longtime critic of Obamacare.

Democrats and Republicans have expressed anger over the prospect of several million Americans having their policies canceled. Obama's proposed fix on Thursday was aimed at addressing one of a myriad of problems associated with the law since the glitchy website Healthcare.gov went online last month.

Nov 27, 2013 7:18PM
avatar

The politicians are to blame, but they’re taking a page from the white house and blaming everyone but themselves.

 

The politicians hired, or approved the hiring of Oracle, so the fault lies with them.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

RECENT QUOTES

WATCHLIST

Symbol
Last
Change
Shares
Quotes delayed at least 15 min
Sponsored by:

MARKET UPDATE

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished a down week on a cautious note with small caps leading the retreat. The Russell 2000 lost 0.5%, widening its weekly decline to 2.6%, while the S&P 500 shed 0.3%. The benchmark index ended the week lower by 2.7%.

This morning, the market was provided a basis to rebound with the July employment report, which was just right for the policy doves (209K versus Briefing.com consensus 220K). It showed payroll growth that was weaker than expected, ... More


Currencies

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.