The recovery's missing link: Paychecks
Stop obsessing about the unemployment rate. For a real look at what's happening in the economy, focus on personal incomes.
On Friday, all of us on and around Wall Street will go into hyperdrive to chew on the latest update to the nation's unemployment rate. But with the economy and the market entering a new stage, it's time for us to obsess about a new number -- how fast incomes are growing.
One measure of that came out last week, as the Commerce Department reported that inflation-adjusted, after-tax personal income rose 0.3 percent in February and 0.2 percent in January. And that's good news -- the same figure, which includes both wages and other income, rose just 0.7 percent in calendar 2013, but now up 2.3 percent over the last year, economist Joel Naroff points out.
"The early signs that the recovery is indeed poised to change gears will be seen in the income numbers," Naroff wrote. "People seem to be getting more money. As long as inflation remains in check -- and the price index rose only 0.1 percent both including and excluding food and energy -- it looks like household spending power just may finally be accelerating."
Why does this matter? On Main Street, it matters because income growth has been the missing link in the recovery, as new Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen keeps saying. On Wall Street, it matters because wage growth is emerging as one of the new metrics Yellen keeps telling investors to watch for guidance into when the Fed will decide the job market is healthy enough that the Fed can ease off its years of stimulus and let interest rates rise.
You can look at the higher income growth of the last few months as good or bad news. If you think making more money is bad, you probably own bonds and are worried about interest rates rising from the virtually-zero levels we have gotten used to. If you think that recoveries are built around virtuous circles of more people being employed, making more money, and spending more, then it’s an unmixed good as long as inflation stays tame.
More of us work and spend money than own major amounts of bonds, to state the obvious.
What you can't really deny is that it's necessary. Median family income dropped about 10 percent in inflation adjusted terms between 2007 and 2011, even though the recession ended in 2009, and has made up only about a third of the lost ground, according to the U.S. Census.
That's bad for business -- weak income growth, especially among young people, is why metrics from household formation to the birth rate have all fallen sharply from pre-recession levels. It means fewer houses built, fewer clothes sold at back-to-school sales, and fewer jobs. If housing starts made up half of the margin between last year and 2007 -- just half -- it would be worth more than 1 million jobs, based on the rule of thumb that each housing start creates three jobs for a year (which I got from IHS Global Insight).
If America gets a raise, everything will work better. Including the financial markets, where anything lost on bonds should be made up in corporate profits -- and ultimately in stocks.
Even if you disagree, you now have to watch wages to know what the Federal Reserve is going to do about interest rates. In her maiden press conference as chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, Yellen made clear that wages will be a key thing she watches as she mulls when to raise rates.
She also made clear that she doesn’t think that time is at hand -- a point she came back to in Monday's speech in Chicago.
"Wage growth has really been very low," Yellen said in Washington. "With the productivity growth we have and 2 percent inflation, one would probably expect to see . . . something between -- perhaps 3 and 4 percent wage [growth, before inflation adjustment] would be normal. Wage inflation has been running at 2 percent. An increase in it might signal some tightening or meaningful pressures on inflation, at least over time. And I would say we're not seeing that."
Or, as she said Monday, "The low rate of wage growth is, to me, another sign that the Fed's job is not yet done."
Naroff thinks wages will be ticking up as the economy moves into the second half of the year -- ust as, in 2012, he thought unemployment would go below 8 percent by election day, when the Fed thought it would still be around 8.5 percent. So he's being contrarian -- again. And the inflation data tells us we should all relax and enjoy it, rather than panic about rates rising because people will get a raise, he argues.
So Friday, of course you'll listen at 8:30 a.m. for the new unemployment rate and monthly job gains. But if you really want to know what will happen next, you should also look for the hourly earnings numbers in the same report. Forecasts for those are beginning to rise a little bit, too.
And incomes are where sophisticated players' attention will be shifting as the unemployment rate drops toward 6 percent and the economy finally begins to really move.
More from MarketWatch
"People seem to be getting more money. As long as inflation remains in check -- and the price index rose only 0.1 percent both including and excluding food and energy -- it looks like household spending power just may finally be accelerating."
BS. Apparently the author of this article does not buy groceries, put gas in a vehicle, pay for heating fuel, or in general buy anything.
Prices are up well north of 0.1% - they rose more than that in the last month alone. I make a middle class income (nearly 60k) and that is what I've made for going on 7 years now. The bills are paid and then it's hunker down for the month.
BTW I really enjoyed a shopping spree at the dollar general for bread and laundry detergent with my $15 (no sh*t) federal tax refund. I guess the reason the roads are falling apart and the country is in debt up to it's eyeballs is beacsue the $9k I paid in taxes wasn't enough.
Sorry but this is a no brainer. If you don't increase wages and people can't afford to buy anything how do you expect the economy to recover and continue on? If wages don't start to increase there will be no improvement, plain and simple.
This is why having so much wealth at the top is a bad thing. I'm not against someone making millions or billions but when the bulk of the wealth continues to be concentrated to a select few it just turns into a vicious downward circle. The wealthy can only buy so much and only need so much. An economy can not be supported on what they spend alone. This is why the middle class is so important. Short term gains for the super rich don't do the economy good in the long run. A strong middle class is needed and in the long run that will actually net those at the top a better, solid, reliable, return. Growing the middle class is the best investment strategy otherwise it is only a matter of time before the train will run out of steam and everything comes to a halt.
Greed continues to blind those at the top of the real picture and their future downfall should the middle class continue to disappear.
At least this is getting more attention and I've seen news of those at the top realizing that they better keep the foundation (middle class) solid by paying more or their towers will fall.
I think its time
"The early signs that the recovery is indeed poised to change gears will be seen in the income numbers,"
Five years is the early stage?
And quit letting the big corporations and special interests feast on the bones of the once great middle class.
Feels like every time I get a raise, the government also raises my taxes. Then I'll make the same as before. That's why my paychecks are always the same.
Work hard and give the givernment leeches a raise.
Anybody who believes this economy is good is just ignorant. The current administration releases only numbers they want you to hear not what the actual numbers are. Inflation is crazy yet the administration does not include the increase in food and energy which just happen to be the two items that have increased in price the most. The administration is having to pump over twenty billion dollars a week into the economy just to keep it from imploding. If we pay one million dollars a day it would take us over fifty thousand years to pay off the current national debt and these idiot's in Washington just keep wasting taxpayers dollars. This country is headed for a major collapse.
While the statistics stated in the article show a bright future, many of us have had stagnated wages for the past seven or more years. And many have lost jobs/income, taken lower paying jobs, etc. Utilities, food prices, gas prices, etc. have steadily increased against my fixed income; revealing a worsening household budget and financial foundation. The addition of paying more for health care insurance thanks to our National Health care plan, has caused my wife and myself to be on survival mode.
So where are these figures coming from? How are they computed? I really don't believe what this article has said regarding an increase in income unless these figures include the top 1% who have made great gains in income compared to the other 99%. When the wealthiest 400 people in the country make as much as half of the other 99% combined, there is an obvious disparagement in income. And this may explain the rise in average incomes that seems to leave most of us out on the side of the road with our thumbs in the air.
the lack of jobs is the real problem and that is caused by our trade policies that have killed manufacturing in America…thank you to all the free trade supporters that also advocate free everything for those that aren't citizens and citizens that don't work
Single rail, high speed, personal vehicles that attach. Jobs for generations. Increase in commerce and travel. Exportable.
Where is the vision of our future? Where are the leaders?
Our politicians, banks, and industries are selling us short. Pathetic stagnation. Americans DESERVE better than what we are getting.
Outsourced good paying jobs. Reduced middle class and their income. Wipshood employees to compete with one another. Bring in illegal immigrants. The list goes on. Man will take a cut in pay rather than watching his family starve. Man will also get mean and agree. Just a matter of how much will he take.
I have an interesting report I used to copy and paste to these stories for your enlightenment but MSN has figured out how to deny my story from posting. Sorry. Summery; both political parties are involved and have both endorsed "Workforce 2000" back in the early 80's.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market began the new trading week on the defensive note with small-cap stocks pacing the retreat. The Russell 2000 (-1.4%) and Nasdaq Composite (-1.1%) displayed relative weakness, while the S&P 500 lost 0.8% with all ten sectors ending in the red.
Global equities began showing some cracks overnight after China's Finance Minister Lou Jiwei poured cold water on hopes for new stimulus measures. Specifically, Mr. Lou said the government has no plans to change ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'