Those Lululemon sheer pants are back -- and cost $92

The company says it is 'celebrating failure' with a patched-up version of the bottoms called the 'Second Chance Pant.'

By MSN Money Partner Nov 13, 2013 2:13PM
Credit: © Andy Clark/Reuters

Caption: A customer enters the Lululemon store in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia November 8, 2013By Hayley Peterson, Business Insider

The yoga pants that Lululemon (LULU) recalled in March for being too sheer are back in stores.

Lululemon is selling a patched-up version of the bottoms, called the "Second Chance Pant," for $92.

That's not much less than the $98 the pants initially sold for before they were pulled from stores. The revamped version hit stores in mid-October.

For the "Second Chance Pant," the company has sewn an extra layer of fabric onto the back and added strips of see-through mesh along the legs.

The tag on the bottoms reads: "These pants were inspired by a need to find functional and beautiful design solutions for our sheer pants. This is what celebrating failure looks like!"

The company explains further, "We added mesh panels on the side and a luon fabric panel across the back to give you the coverage you need in Down Dog."

Lululemon confirmed to Business Insider Tuesday that the bottoms are made from the company's recalled yoga pants.

Lululemon's recall in March, which affected 17% of its inventory, is expected to cost the company as much as $67 million in revenue this year.

Lululemon rolled out new pants with a supposedly thicker fabric, called "Full-On Luon," in July. But some customers have been complaining that the new pants are still too sheer and that the material began pilling after only a couple of wears, Business Insider first reported

Lululemon's founder, Chip Wilson, suggested last week that some women's bodies are to blame for the ongoing problems with the pants. He later posted a video apology for his remarks and begged customers to give the company a second chance.

More from Business Insider

Tags: LULU
Nov 13, 2013 3:10PM
Kind of reminds me of the spandex era. Remember the wife and I went over to her sisters and her sister was wearing a pair of spandex pants (we all know a nearly 300 lbs. woman should not be wearing spandex), than made the mistake of asking if I liked her spandex, Me being me, I was like not really, and she was like why not, I said it looked like an elephant trying to stretch into a mouse skin. Her husband was sitting on the arm of the couch and he fell off the couch and was howling on the floor, my wife was burying her head in my back trying to keep from laughing, as for me I was just standing there smiling, then my sister-in-law stormed off to her bedroom and kicked her husband in the gut as she passed him, which just made him laugh even harder.
Nov 13, 2013 2:37PM
ever been to a gym lately?
those with huge buts and cellulite
should not be wearing lulu pants!


Nov 13, 2013 2:58PM

The President of Lu Lu Lemon sounds like a Lu Lu Looser!  And the women that continue to purchase these poor quality overpriced pants are Lu Lu Lemmings.

Wake up and buy a lose fitting pair of sweat pants.  You will be better off, and so will the viewers in most cases.

Nov 13, 2013 3:51PM

With all the comments about larger sized women not wearing this type of attire I have

to concur.  Being a larger sized I have never tried to wear something that clings or

exaggerates what might be better concealed.  The old ski pants, tights, jeggins,

not any tunic or sweatshirt can begin cover that stuff.  A decent pair of jeans works better

than trying to be "fashionable" in some cockamamie getup some woman hating

"fashion" designer came up with to increase their profit margin with a "new" trend.

The other end of the spectrum is the sweat pants, just a good mirror and common sense

or is that asking too much?



Nov 13, 2013 4:03PM
lmao!  $100 for pants that aren't really even pants?

barnam had it right I guess.

Nov 13, 2013 2:53PM
They're just playing into our shallow, narcissistic, exhibitionist culture. 
Nov 13, 2013 3:45PM
Amazing my size 6 wife still makes do with Russell athletic gear.
Nov 13, 2013 5:02PM
No way I'd ever pay that much for yoga pants, let alone "2nds". 
Nov 13, 2013 3:42PM
That is some a$$ on that chick with the jeans!!  Too bad most of the women who wear those pants aren't shaped like her!
Nov 13, 2013 5:14PM
Anyone that pays $92 dollars for a pair of pants has way too much money and way too few brains.... I know we have more than our share of them!
Nov 13, 2013 5:32PM
There's a sucker born every minute and those pants are just the proof of concept. 
Nov 13, 2013 2:49PM
People don't need to dress like whores at the gym. men or women your there to work out so cover up. Men don't need to see womens bodys that are fat and ugly. As well as men. Just work out and that's it. Now the other topic black tight streach pants do wee need to see a womans camel toe or fat **** with the pants going deep in her **** crack. put on a shirt that covers your croch and ****
Nov 13, 2013 5:46PM
Darn! I was hoping for some revealing photos
Nov 13, 2013 4:59PM
Nothing like a fit, trim woman walking ahead or coming at you in see through Lulu pants.
Such form fitting views.
Keep it girls us guys like it.
Don't buy the patch models unless your overweight and need the extra blow out protection.

Nov 13, 2013 8:04PM
Remember folks, Spandex is a privilege, not a right!
Nov 13, 2013 3:51PM
Nov 13, 2013 7:02PM
Nov 13, 2013 3:30PM
Wear clothes loose enough to look like a lady. These do not look like a lady would wear
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.



Quotes delayed at least 15 min


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market welcomed the new trading week with a mixed session that saw relative strength among large-cap stocks, while high-beta names underperformed. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.3%) and S&P 500 (-0.1%) finished near their flat lines, while the Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 both lost 1.1%.

Equities began the day on a cautious note amid continued concerns regarding the strength of the global economy. Over the weekend, China reported its first decline ... More


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.