12/12/2012 4:15 PM ET|
Smarter ways to tap the rich
Simply letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire won't fix the fiscal mess. Two creative ideas: Public-private infrastructure projects and a one-time, 26% wealth tax.
The fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington have hit an impasse with Republicans and Democrats entrenched in familiar positions. Democrats want tax hikes on the rich. Republicans want cuts to entitlement programs.
For many, the debate has boiled down to "Why don't the rich pay their fair share?" Taxes on the wealthy are the one policy tool that the majority of Americans support.
As I discussed last week (see "Why not jump off the fiscal cliff?"), ending the Bush tax cuts for the rich (worth around $80 billion a year) or ending them plus limiting deductions, as President Barack Obama has proposed (around $160 billion), won't solve the country's fiscal woes. It won't even come close. The fiscal cliff adds up to a $720 billion economic hit next year, and most of that comes from the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for the middle class.
But the rich do have an important role in getting us out of this mess. Below, I outline two ways the upper crust can break us out of this funk and return us to the path of prosperity.
We need to put their money to work if American jobs are going to return. But income tax hikes aren't the best way to do it.
2 problems, 2 solutions
In another recent column, (see "Is the economy a lost cause?"), I lamented the slow decline in America's economic vigor, with measures such as labor productivity and per-capita growth of gross domestic product having stalled. U.S. society has become increasingly overburdened by the cost of senior care and old debts, and, as a result, we're now neglecting critical investments in capital, infrastructure and young families.
This is unsustainable. If America's potential growth rate -- its economic speed limit -- continues to drop, the tax base will continue to shrink even as rates rise. Reliance on government welfare programs will grow, and the system will collapse on itself.
It's unacceptable in a country as prosperous as ours to have families killed by falling bridges and failing levees. It's unacceptable for time to be wasted on commuting nightmares on par with those in Romania and Hungary. And it's unacceptable to see America's productive capital base -- its machinery and equipment -- rust away due to a lack of business confidence and a corporate system that encourages companies to hoard profits overseas.
For the sake of discussion, let's focus on infrastructure. What's the scale of the problem? California has the country's worst road congestion and faces a $100 billion project backlog. Nearly three-fourths of the major roads in Massachusetts are in poor or mediocre condition. More than half the bridges in Rhode Island are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Overall, the American Society of Civil Engineers gave the country's infrastructure a "D" grade and recommended an investment of $1.6 trillion over the next five years.
That's point one.
Point two is that, for a variety of reasons, economic growth has become more unequal over the past few decades. Part of it is technological change. Part of it is rapid globalization and the downward wage pressure created by an army of cheap foreign labor. The result has seen benefits accrue disproportionately to the top.
According to Federal Reserve data, median household wealth for the middle class (in 2010 dollars) has actually fallen from $70,200 in 1989 to $65,800 in 2010. For the top 10% in terms of income, it has increased from $655,200 to nearly $1.2 million over the same period. It's the same story with income: Median income for the middle class dropped to $43,400 in 2010 from $45,800 in 1989, but it rose to $205,300 from $175,900 for the top 10%.
Research by Marianne Bertrand and Adair Morse, both of the University of Chicago, finds that as the rich spent lavishly with their new wealth, everyone else tried to keep up. Coach (COH) bags for everyone!
That, according to research from the International Monetary Fund, drove people into debt -- mortgages to chase the housing bubble, consumer credit, and now, student loans. Government played a role, too, borrowing to fund social programs as people voted to increase their welfare via the tax code and public spending.
As a result, household and government debts have surged, and they now hinder economic growth. Household debt as a percentage of disposable income went from around 70% in the 1970s to a peak of 134% in 2007 to 113% now. Government debt as a percentage of GDP has increased from around 30% in 1980 to near 100% now.
The reason the Federal Reserve's aggressive efforts to stimulate the economy haven't had a bigger impact is because people are unwilling or unable to increase borrowing. The government is focused on budget cutbacks, not investment. And households are focused on shedding debt to find their way back to a sustainable standard of living.
Moreover, the academic research shows that not only does higher debt limit economic vitality, but it increases the risk of financial crisis as well.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
The Dems and GOP do not care about us middle of the road folks. Did you know currently the standard deduction for a married couple is 200% of a single filer who gets a standard deduction of $5,950 vs. $11,900 for a married couple. As of Jan. 1, 2013 the deduction for a married couple goes back to 167% of a single person or $9,900. This means tax on $2,000 more for 2013 even if you make the same amount of money. The minimum tax rate for 2013 is 15% or $300 more tax for 2013. If you are in the 25% tax bracket it will be $500. more tax. Also, the social seciurity tax will be increased back to the 6.20% from the current 4.20% it has been for the last 2 years. If you make $50,000 this means 2% of $50,000 = $1,000. There is an additional minimum tax increase of $1300 for 2013, or over $100 less take home pay per month.
You people who think Obama gives a S*** about you are nuts. He probably does not realize this is going to happen to you or even care. Live with the vote for the FRAUD of America!
A wealth tax?
There is a reason the seven deadly sins are called deadly - they lead to the death of the soul. In secular terms, it means that they degrade the humanity of the sinner and make them substandard creatures leading miserable lives. Those whose envy causes them to reject nearly every value that made America great because of their envy should not be ignored. They should be ridiculed and pilloried.
Let us start with Mirhaydari. Yeah, he has to write a column every day or so, and yeah, his words far outnumber his thoughts, but this is ridiculous. Is there no limit to the depths that MSNBC can sink?
A one time wealth tax might seem facially appealing until one realizes that there is no such thing as a one time tax. Period. Look at all the "temporary" tax increases that became permanent. It is naive in the extreme to believe that the the Federal Government, given a new source of revenue, won't simply spent more, then come back for more. The limit for "wealth tax" would become progressively lower, until the middle class is is deemed "wealthy" enough to pay the "wealth tax." Remember how Clinton ducked and dodged when the media tried to pin him down on what consitutued "high income." If I remember correctly, it turned out to be 35K.
A better source of additional revenue would be a VAT. At least then, when the politicians start digging deeper into everyone's pocket, they will have to deal with the howls and screams from everyone. And a VAT will hit the upper class harder ... they are the ones that spend the money.
Point 1 - You can't borrow your way out of debt. How stupid are you?
Point 2 - Stealing from the rich to give to the poor sounds like 'Robin Hood' but is really just Communism. Better dead than red.
Bad idea, Anthony. Maybe you can raise taxes AND put a luxury tax on items that cost over 100k and homes that cost over 750k.
Many years the debt can has been kicked down the road and it will not be solved in a year or 2. Plan on a long term solution.
the govt wants people to keep borrowing money how the hell people gonna do that when they already in debt ??? or dont havea job !!!how bout the govt giving peple who have worked at least 15 years 100,000 so they can spend it and boost the economy ...couse giving it to all these crooked companies sure hasnt created any jobs !!!!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] Equity indices closed out the month of August on a modestly higher note. The Russell 2000 (+0.6%) and Nasdaq Composite (+0.5%) finished ahead of the S&P 500 (+0.3%), which extended its August gain to 3.8%. Blue chips lagged with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) spending the bulk of the session in the red.
The final week of August represented one of the quietest stretches for the stock market so far this year. The first four sessions of the week produced the ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'