12/27/2012 5:30 PM ET|
The hunt for the next Apple
Long the market's hottest stock, Apple is faltering, raising questions about its future. Picking the next Apple -- a game changer ready to take off -- is daunting, but here are 3 contenders.
As long as there's an Apple (AAPL), investors will wonder, what's the next Apple?
The question is valid, because even great companies falter. Economics change. Technology shifts. Even those that adapt don't grow like successful startups forever.
Apple, of course, occupies a unique position in the business cosmos right now. It reinvented itself, starting in late 2001, from a closely watched and admired personal computer maker into something more profound, thanks in large part to the late Steve Jobs' brilliant flair for marketing.
Now iPhones, iPads, iPods, the iTunes store and Apple stores around the world are instantly recognizable, generating astonishing amounts of revenue and profit. The stock is up 18,800% since the company went public in 1980 -- and more than 520% since the March 2009 market bottom. Its market capitalization jumped to $660 billion in mid-September.
But the shares have fallen more than 26% since. The debate rages as to whether the stock has peaked or this represents a huge buying opportunity. Yet even with the pullback, Apple's market value of $484 billion makes it bigger than Exxon Mobil (XOM) by itself and Microsoft (MSFT) and Google (GOOG) combined. (Microsoft is the publisher of MSN Money.)
And that raises a question you can ask of any huge company: Can such a giant continue to reward investors with huge gains over time, or is the better buy a "next Apple" that's just starting its road to riches?
Comparing any company with Apple is tough. But I have three "next Apple" candidates for you, drawn from three game-changing fields: electronic payments, electric cars and three-dimensional printing. I'll get to those companies in a minute, but first we need to look at why Apple works so well.
Looking for new ways to compete
The story of Apple's 1976 founding by Jobs and Steve Wozniak is well-documented in computer lore.
But the powerhouse Apple we know today didn't exist until Jobs, ousted in the mid-1980s, returned as a consultant in 1997. At that time, the computing environment was changing. Apple seemed unable to find a CEO who could make the company much more than a niche maker of computers that appealed to students, geeks, artists and desktop publishers.
Computers were becoming a commodity business, one box basically the same as another. Jobs was smart enough to see that his company would get nowhere if it couldn't differentiate itself -- and he was showman enough to find the way.
One result was the iMac computer -- one piece, colorful, fun to look at and easy to use.
Next -- and much more important -- was the iPod music player, introduced just after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. The iPod generated $146 million in sales its first year. By fiscal 2005, it represented a third of Apple's $14 billion in revenue and had changed the music industry.
The iPod naturally led to the iPhone, introduced in 2007. The iPhone in all its iterations generated $80 billion in revenue in the 2012 fiscal year, about 51% of Apple's total and more revenue than Dell (DELL). The iPhone commands about 53% of the domestic smartphone market.
The iPhone led to the iPad tablet, introduced in 2010. The iPad now generates about 20% of Apple's business. Sales have grown more than 2,800% from $5 billion in fiscal 2001 to more than $156 billion in the latest fiscal year. In the process, Apple has more or less fulfilled the groundbreaking vision that Jobs laid out in a 1983 speech: "What we want to do is we want to put an incredibly great computer in a book that you can carry around with you and learn how to use in 20 minutes."
A wild ride for investors
The result has been enriching for investors. Apple shares have provided fabulous returns, but it's important to understand how they behave. The shares have suffered at least seven major sell-offs -- falling at least 25%, usually quite a bit more -- in Apple's 32 years as a public company.
The worst was the 91% selloff in the dot-com bust and the 9/11 aftermath. But if you had jumped into the stock on April 17, 2003, when it closed at $6.56, you'd be up 7,903%.
After reaching $200 at the end of 2007, the stock fell 61% to $78.20 on Jan. 20, 2009. The stock is up nearly 560% since, selling for more than $510 a share.
This all sounds great, except for the 26% pullback since September. What's happened?
● Hedge funds, which had been Apple's biggest owners, may have started to take profits, fearing higher taxes in 2013.
● The stock has fallen under its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, key confidence measures.
● Apple's fourth-quarter results missed Street estimates. The Street was looking for $8.75 a share; the company reported $8.67 -- still a gain of 23% from a year earlier.
● There are worries that profit margins will shrink from increasing competition. Thanks to faster networks, you can download apps to your phone from the Web. You don't need Apple's App Store.
● Apple misses Jobs' passion. The company hasn't been able to suggest what the next big Apple thing will be. There's lots of talk -- but nothing concrete -- about an actual Apple television.
● The current technology cycle -- built on the rise of the Internet, online commerce, social networking and the cloud -- may be approaching its peak, and growth rates could stall.
It's possible that Apple's stock is simply consolidating for another run-up that will start after it reports fiscal-first-quarter earnings, probably on Jan. 24. Then again, the stock briefly topped $700 a share in September; even if it regains that lofty perch, it's not clear what could move it seriously higher than that.
So if the big gains are done, what might be the next Apple?
From the very big to the small
Defining such a stock isn't easy, and finding one is even tougher.
If you just want a big groundbreaking tech company getting bigger, but with more room to grow than Apple, Amazon.com (AMZN) is a good candidate. So is Google. Don't forget Samsung Electronics(SSNLF), which is both an archrival and a partner of Apple.
Samsung's Galaxy III and Galaxy Note II devices have won rave reviews and are selling briskly. Some analysts believe the devices are more advanced than Apple's. The stock, listed on the Korea Stock Exchange as 005930:KS, is up 45% this year in Korea.
Google has licensed its smartphone operating system to Samsung. In the view of Mark Anderson, of the Strategic News Service, the Internet search giant’s groundbreaking work on driverless cars; Google Glass, a computer built into the frames of eyeglasses; and its maps and global positioning systems’ features have the potential to provide new growth. And, he added, Google has a fantastic advertising business; shares are up 41% this year.
Amazon is an entirely different business, built to drive prices and profit margins ever lower in what to Anderson looks like a quest to overtake Wal-Mart Stores (WMT). But investors love the stock, which is up 49% this year. (I wrote about it recently in "Buy the next Amazon.com.")
The risk with seeing any of the three as the next Apple is that they are all so big already; Samsung's revenue will probably hit $182 billion for 2012 and maybe $199 billion in 2013. And there's a chance that the shares for all three could fall back hard.
If you're looking for game changers that, like Apple, could ultimately change the world you live in, you have to look deeper.
Some of the most interesting candidates are those creating new mobile payments systems that allow you to buy something by simply swiping a card on a tiny reader that communicates with your bank. The players here are still private companies Square and LevelUp, along with eBay's (EBAY) Pay Pal.
You'll find similar potential in the fields of electric cars and in the closely watched technology of 3-D printing. From these fields, I've drawn three potential next Apples:
- Tesla Motors (TSLA). Many believe that the maker of high-end electric cars is ahead of others working on similar vehicles.The question is when the company will start generating profits. Analysts believe 2013 will be the year. One drawback is that Tesla's offerings are not priced for a mass market. A second drawback is that batteries last for only about 200 miles on a charge. So driving across, say, Montana, would require multiple recharging stops.
- Square. The privately held company's payment device may change how we spend our money. And a lot of money is betting that it will. The company raised $200 million this summer, which implies that the company is worth some $3.25 billion. The company's square credit-card reader plugs into a smartphone’s earbud jack, helping individuals and small vendors -- such as taxi drivers and nail salons -- accept credit card payments on their phones. Square provides the reader, and the software free, but it charges users 2.75% of any transactions. For each fee, it collects a small portion and sends the rest to the relevant credit card company.
- MarketBot. The company makes 3-D printers that allow consumers to print something in three dimensions -- a solid object from a digital model. Literally. (Search on Bing for more on the technology.) MarketBot offers such a machine for $2,200. Like Square, though, this is not yet a public company. And that, of course, is the hitch.
Investing in Tesla is a leap of faith that requires patience. For either of the two others, you'll have to wait for a potential public offering to get in on the action, which also requires patience. (You can find early speculation about a Square IPO online already.)
But finding a stock that rewards investors the way Apple has will never be easy.
At the time of publication, Charley Blaine did not own or control shares of any company mentioned in this column.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
So mobile is close to peaking....WHAT?? That is ridiculous, there is a revolution going on in computing. How can Samsung be suggested as an alternative? if this is true, they just make phones and use a free operating system that may or may not be the best moving forward as it's up to Google, no differentiator from others, seems like that would be a bigger problem to retain sales. Apple has the hardware and the operating system, applications and cloud, plus they have shown superior hardware packaging designs, pick up an iphone 5 vs anything else. If even bigger screens are in well not brain surgery to do that if needed, but they will match screen ratios, unlike the chaos in Droid. Google and Samsung will no longer have the benefit of sitting on Apples board,or supplying parts so no visibility going forward as to what Apple is doing.
The next Apple is Apple everyone else is taking scatter shots to try and emulate what they HAVE DONE but, have still not got all the pieces.......never mind where they are going.
FYI 3 D printing has been around for decades, I doubt your average person is going to design 3 d parts which you would need to do. If they decide to do this there are a multiple of services out there that will make the "part" if you e-mail the file. Better quality parts, next day service and cost is very competitive compared to owning and servicing one of the 3 d printers. This is excitement from people who have not come into contact with this technology in my opinion. Besides you are suggesting a private company to invest in? Huh?
Apple has 100 billion dollars in cash,,, they could do a lot of good things with that money,,, hoever they eat 150 dollar lobsters on friday nights, while people toil for 2 dollars an hour, so they and some crooks on wall street can gamble lots of cash everyday, and the criminal part is thier are little kids staving in garbage dumps just down the street and
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The headlines generally favored Tuesday being another good day for the stock market. Instead, it was just a mixed day with modest point changes on either side of the unchanged mark for the major indices.
For the most part, the stock market was a sideshow. The main trading events were seen in the commodity and Treasury markets, both of which saw some decent-sized losses within their respective complex.
Dollar strength was at the heart of the weakness in ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'