6/19/2013 7:00 PM ET|
The next big 401k wipeout: Bonds
Looking for safety after the last market crash, investors poured retirement savings into bonds. But prices are falling, which means painful sales or being locked into low returns for years.
Wall Street has a special talent for duping Main Street investors. It pushed buy-and-hold ahead of the worst decadelong performance in stocks since the Great Depression. It pushed the dot-com bubble. It pushed buy-and-flip housing.
The latest involves investors' post-recession obsession with bonds.
Everyday investors went looking for something safe and steady after two stock market blowups, so they loaded up their 401k and IRA accounts with bonds. After the financial crisis passed, billions flowed into the corporate bond market, and stocks were largely ignored.
While we can't be precise about all those moves, one measure shows that since the recession, $1 trillion has flowed into taxable bond mutual funds -- while similar stock funds lost nearly $400 billion. That and other data suggest a major shift in our retirement portfolios from stocks to bonds.
Why did we move? Because brokers, advisers and experts promised that we could escape worries about market ups and downs. That we'd get safe, steady income without trading or turmoil. That we could collect regular yield payments and simply enjoy life.
Unfortunately, that's not true. When the bond market goes bad, bonds carry risks, just as stocks do. And right now, bonds are in trouble, as Apple's (AAPL) recent bond mess shows. Here's why, along with some advice to help you get your 401k out of the way before the wipeout.
The sour Apple bonds story
Bonds are like marriages: They're easy to get into, but difficult to leave. When the economy revs up, you're locked in and miss out on bigger gains in stocks. If the economy falters, you face higher risks while settling for Treasury-like returns. When inflation kicks higher, your returns -- the yield payments from bonds -- don't go up with it.
And when bond prices drop, as they are doing now, you either sell at a loss or settle for a low return. And that's where we are in the bond bubble.
A key turning point, and a great illustration of the problem, is the $17 billion bond issue floated by Apple in late April, the largest nonbank debt deal ever.
The writing was on the wall, even if few noticed. The stock had peaked in September and had since fallen 45% to reach its mid-April low. The company had just posted its first drop in quarterly earnings in a decade. Apple's bonds didn't attract the coveted AAA rating from the credit agencies. And management was explicit that the cash wouldn't be used to fund exciting new products and innovations; it would be used instead to help return cash to shareholders.
Still, at the time, Wall Street told us that investors were rushing to get in on the deal, claims that now sound like the hype that preceded the disastrous Facebook (FB) IPO. The offering attracted more than $50 billion in orders, with the bonds ultimately pricing at a yield -- or rate of return -- of just 3.85% for the 30-year notes. Yields fell even lower in the secondary market once the bonds started trading, as prices climbed.
Now consider that, since 1962, the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond has yielded 3.85% or less just 11% of the time. So the Apple bonds paid investors far less than T-bills on average and locked their money up three times longer.
That's not a good deal.
In the weeks that followed, overall interest rates have increased as market volatility has picked up. Some of this is due to turmoil in Japan. Some of it is due to fears that the Federal Reserve could slowly reduce its $85 billion-a-month bond purchase stimulus. And some of it is due to a rerating of corporate default risk by investors looking at a darkening macroeconomic and earnings outlook.
As a result, the price of Apple's bonds maturing in 2043 dropped, peak-to-trough, 11.4% to a new low last week. That does bring the yield up. And if yields keep rising, due to higher interest rates and/or more concerns about default risks, prices will keep falling, because of the inverse relationship between bond price and yield.
But consider what this really means. Apple bondholders can't sell their bonds without taking big losses. But if they don't sell, they're stuck with relatively low returns for 30 years. Like a bad marriage.
While bond buyers got hosed, the company and its shareholders made out: If Apple floated its bond offering now, it would have to pay buyers an additional $400 million annually over the next 30 years, according to calculations by Bloomberg News.
And what about the traditional argument in favor of bonds: that if you plan to hold a bond to maturity in 2043, none of these fluctuations matter?
Well, since 1871, 10-year Treasury bonds have averaged a 4.7% return. With these Apple bonds, at best, you're earning 20% less than that every year for three decades.
The great bond mistake
The story of these Apple bonds illustrates the wider problem: investors, in their feverish desire for safety and income, have been overpaying for bonds that don't offer enough return to compensate them for the risks inherent in fixed-income investments.
Inflation alone has averaged 2.3% since 1871, so those 3.85% Apple bonds were set to provide a real, after-inflation return of only 1.6% a year. That might have seemed attractive a month after the housing bust and stock collapse. But with stocks up more than 100% from their bottom, it probably doesn't right now.
And if you're looking at funding a retirement, I bet you want more than 1.6% a year from the money you've put in your 401k or IRA.
Consider the valuations of the entire corporate bond market. According to data on speculative corporate bonds from Standard & Poor's, non-investment grade issues are carrying default rates 140% higher than they were at the 2007 market top (2.4% vs. 1%) while yields are at 6.3%, and were just 5.2% a few weeks ago, versus 9.3% then.
The simple translation: People are carrying more risk (from both default and inflation), but they aren't being compensated for it, because higher bond prices lowered yields. That's the very definition of an overpriced asset.
And now, bond investors are getting reacquainted with market risk as well -- the chance that, if you decide to sell your bond holdings before maturity, the market will have moved against you and you'll have to sell at a loss.
Funds that invest in higher-yielding but riskier bonds, like the Barclays SPDR High Yield Bond (JNK) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond (HYG) exchange-traded funds, have lost more than 3% of their value since early May, or roughly six months' worth of the income they generate.
The damage has been deeper in the safer investment-grade class of bonds: The iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD) fund has lost 4.5% in the past month and a half, wiping out 15 months' worth of yield income. That's dead money. It just sits there.
And sadly, such funds are where investors scared by the crash seem to have gone. According to Investment Company Institute fund-flow data, for example, investors have poured nearly $1 trillion into taxable bond funds since the bear market ended in March 2009. Compare that with a $382 billion net withdrawal from domestic stocks over the same period.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
My Dad used to say, "Never trust Financial Advisers. If they are so good with money, then why are they still working?"
Best advice I ever got.
If you've been paying down your debt this year, or putting some savings aside, then you're in a good position going forward into 2014 as 'Uncle Ben' tapers off QE.
INTEREST RATES ARE GOING TO RISE !
So all the savers will get a better interest rate but if you've taken on more debt - you're in trouble if you don't act fast. All those unsecured debts (credit cards and such) will see their rates start to rise beginning at the end of the month-maybe even on your next statement. If you went crazy running over to bonds instead of stocks- you're about to see your money vanish like a fart in the wind - either you settle for a low return or take a loss on the price.
So prepare yourselves today: that first drop today is going to be a doosy !
So maybe the best thing to do is to keep your money out of stocks AND bonds.
I know that you don't get any interest, but at least with cash and precious metals, you can keep your money under YOUR control, and what the fascist and fat-a$$ed government bureaucrats don't know about, they can't get their hands on it and STEAL it from you.
Another thing people, if you're not part of the 1% you're SCREWED anyway, as far as income from savings, so why put it in the market, or the bank, and get it taxed and inflated away? Plus we all know that if you have an account in ANY institution, there's a record of it, and the government knows about it.
Do you REALLY think that if push comes to shove, that they won't confiscate it if they want to?
Of course, it will only happen in an emergency [the government's definition] and "for the common good" [theirs], but just think how YOU are helping the people who screwed up and got us into this mess in the first place.
Like I've been saying for years, HIDE YOUR ASSETS!!! And don't let anyone know where they are
The 401K was never EVER intended to replace a pension. 401Ks were designed as a place for rich, fat cat executives to park a significant portion of their obscene, unearned, and over-sized salary without paying the taxes on that income until they were retired and in a lower tax bracket.
You and I and people like us are not those executives. We aren't.
Most of them had professional and company supplied money managers and financial advisers to oversee the safety and investment of this money.
Us? We have Fidelity and the rest who are making money off our money and will retire long before we lose the second 40-percent in whatever economic collapse comes along.
The 401K? Your government lying through their teeth, straight-faced at you again.
Dave1230: Contrary to popular belief...
Unqualified Applicant Lending-- until 1999, people like ME quality assessed your credit and had to represent and warrant it in pools for investors. All the Equal Opportunity crap was just that... it either qualified or didn't. Government credit had a checklist, met or unmet. Investors were more stringent. Banks were checklist lenders. The paper was lousy even before lousy paper was the norm.
AAA-Rated Derivatives-- Anyone out there STILL not get it? Banks developed derivatives because the majority extended all available funds yet rarely collected consistently. Derivatives lent other people's money on that same ethic of inconsistency. The Rating AGENCIES were bogus from Day One and still are. Accountants don't know beans about credit and 99% of lending isn't bean-counting the numbers.
SHORTING-- Correct. On Monday, the trading volume was relatively low and almost entirely based on anchoring for the Wednesday losses. It's a trolling effect designed to capture small-guy funds to offset big-group corruption and manipulation.
WE ARE HERE-- The number of key players is small and cannibalism is literally the only game left for them. Watch the visibility factor play a key role. I vote we totally erase their genetic code off the face of Earth so we don't have this same premise of greed and omnipotence rear back up in some near-future generation. You can't "administrate" economy, you have to work at it. Paper and button pushing are pariah professions, count on catastrophic failure and you won't be surprised.
And now they stand to lose, big time and for a long time, that's a fact.
There is no miracle answer or strategy.
Diversify .. diversify some more, chill out and play lots of golf.
Works for a guy way higher than my pay grade.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 added just over a point, holding its weekly gain at 1.0% while the Nasdaq lost 0.4%.
The major averages began the day on an upbeat note, but relinquished their opening gains during the first 90 minutes of action. The early sentiment was boosted by a better-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report for February (175K versus Briefing.com consensus 163K), but a closer look into the report suggested that ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'