9/27/2012 7:41 PM ET|
The real problem plaguing Europe
Numerous financial fixes have come and gone, each one setting off a market rally. Here's why, despite the solutions, the crisis won't go away.
Remember how optimistic markets were in June, when European leaders said they would provide up to 100 billion euros to recapitalize Spanish banks?
Or more recently, how about the big rally set off by the Sept. 6 announcement by European Central Bank President Mario Draghi of a clear plan for supporting Spanish and Italian government bonds with potentially unlimited buying of bonds, using eurozone rescue funds and ultimately the European Central Bank itself?
How did we so quickly go from hope and rally to gloom and panicky selling in European -- and, to some extent, global -- financial markets? (And now maybe back again?)
The wrong view
This shift is not surprising if you remember this: The stock and bond markets insist on thinking about the eurozone debt crunch -- and its specific national franchises of the Greek debt crisis, the Spanish debt crisis, etc. -- as a financial crisis. In that context, the market gets giddy when someone proposes a financial fix, such as central bank bond-buying, a recapitalization of Spanish banks or a new round of budget austerity in Greece.
And then the financial markets get blindsided -- and react by selling -- when events remind us that this crisis is no longer primarily financial, if indeed it ever was. Instead, it's a political and economic crisis. There's nothing like pictures of Greeks throwing Molotov cocktails at police to bring this home. Or talk of a potential breakup of Spain after November elections in Catalonia that have turned into a referendum on Catalan independence.
And there's nothing like talk that the Spanish budget introduced Thursday would let the ECB start buying Spanish debt to send the markets back into rally mode -- at least for a day. How long will it last? Will bond buying fix the problem?
If you recast your thinking about the crisis into political and economic terms -- instead of purely financial ones -- the questions you want to answer become very different. The questions aren't whether Spain can patch together a new budget that keeps the deficit from spinning out of control this year. Or whether climbing yields on Spanish government debt will force the government of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy to formally request a program of bond buying and supervised economic reforms.
Instead, the questions are whether the populations of Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy have been so crushed by the collapse of their economies that their governments can no longer deliver on the promises made to their eurozone creditors. And whether the populations of those creditor countries are suffering such bailout fatigue that their governments are thinking of walking away from deals and promises to support the euro.
Bandages aren't enough
The first set of questions -- the financial ones -- will move markets in the short term. And in that short term, those financial problems are susceptible to another Band-Aid solution. I think the next two weeks are likely to bring some plan that will move Spain to ask for a bond-buying program. That announcement would lead to another short-term rally.
The second set of questions -- the economic and political ones -- aren't nearly as easy to address. They certainly aren't amenable to a financial fix. My worry is that the eurozone has spent all of its political capital and that its leaders are now looking for solutions that amount to cutting and running in order to preserve their own positions and to limit the damage to their own narrowly defined self-interests.
My worry is that we're entering the very worst part of the crisis, when all illusions that relatively easy fixes will work (if they were ever implemented, of course) are stripped away and the eurozone falls into confusion as it attempts to reconfigure itself without Greece, potentially without Finland and possibly without Spain.
This confusion would, unfortunately for the global economy and global markets, come at time of potential confusion in the United States (the approaching fiscal cliff) and China (where current stimulus efforts haven't reversed the decline in growth). Kicking the can down the road looks as if it has resulted in turning three individual problems into a coordinated mess.
Let me start in Europe and then sketch the larger picture.
No answer in europolitics
My evidence for political pessimism about Europe?
I'm increasingly inclined to believe speculation that says one party or another in Greece doesn't want current negotiations to result in a deal. If not, why would the International Monetary Fund, the only member of the creditor troika (which also includes the European Commission and the European Central Bank) with actual experience in conducting an economic reorganization, be so unwilling to cut the Greek government any slack?
The latest demand is that the Greek government immediately fire 15,000 government workers. That may make budgetary sense, but politically, it's almost unthinkable.
One conclusion is that the IMF has decided that the current course of wrenching austerity will not result in an end to the Greek debt crisis in any reasonable time frame. (On Sept. 26, Fitch Ratings predicted that the ratio of debt to gross domestic product for Greece would increase from 165% in 2012 to 180% in 2014.)
The IMF, this thinking goes, has decided that holders of Greek debt will have to take another write-down because there is no way to restructure the Greek economy as long as the country carries its current level of debt. A big problem here, of course, is that the biggest Greek creditor is the ECB, which didn't participate in the first round of write-downs. Getting the ECB to agree to take a hit won't be easy. But the alternative, this analysis argues, is continuing to pour money into a lost cause. And this simply isn't acceptable to an IMF that already faces considerable donor backlash from its non-European members.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
The prior poster started off correctly but the they reverted to the targeting rhetoric with terms like "telling seniors, ex govt. workers, welfare and food stamp recipients,,,,,,, sorry but we can only afford to give you 60% of what you have been getting".
How about let's start by telling everybody there will be no special deductions for anything including churches, dependents, educations, mortgages, sales taxes or state taxes. Next let's tax all income regardless of source under the same tax rates no special classes for captial gains, dividends or interest. Next let's stop spending money to protect Australia, Europe, Israel, Japan and Suadi Arabia. Finally, let's stop using money contributed by employees to Medicare and Social Security for disability and medical welfare when those contributions were intended. Last, let's pass a Constitutional amendment that clearly states that the US Government can't run a deficit unless we are engaged in a war to protect the US homeland.
And the main problem is that so many people think that a "gravy train" runs on air! Especially the Democraps and Obama! EVERYONE taking more than they are giving to the government, in the USA or anywhere else in the Universe, needs to shut up and suck it up! Learn to live on what they, personally, make and not expect others to subsidize their life-style! Exceptions might be appropriate for people who are invalids or in dire straights through no fault of their own (actual charity), but the for the rest PULL IN YOUR HORNS AND YOUR BELTS!!!
BTW, the STUPID spell-check on this site tells me that I have spelling errors, but doesn't show me where! Can't SOMETHING be done about that???????????
While we're at it, let's stop talking about Social Security and Medicare as "entitlements", any more than we would refer to a pension plan and medical insurance as "entitlements" They are not entitlements. We pay into the pension plan and pay the premiums and co-pays on the medical insurance. There's' a whole bunch of political skullduggery in making those programs costlier than they should be, like preventing Medicare from negotiating directly with the pharmaceutical industry for better deals for medicine.
So, in summary of the article, the world economy is going to collapse, probably in 2013. But you can still reap some rpofits in the market with one last bounce on phony euro stimulus.
Not sure what to do after that (as it isn't stated in the article), but sell and move to physical gold I guess, as a collapsed world economy will render bonds and currency worthless.
The real problem plaguing Europe is insolvency, both for their Sovereign debt and for their banks (who are holding most of that debt). Most of the "solutions" being cheered are just working on the LIQUIDITY problems, and don't help the insolvency problems at all. The write-downs get rid of some of the insolvency, but at the price of not having a market for any new bonds.
It's like if you loaned your friend a thousand so he could make his mortgage this month, because he has no ready cash. He's not any more solvent for that--in fact he's even further in debt--but he can get by for another month. And you are holding what is probably a worthless IOU.
OK, here's a post sure to be disliked by Chauvinists for both parties.
Here's a summary of the current choices:
The Demagogic Party: slogan "Your chickens in everybody else's pots".
The Re-pooplican Party: slogan "The same old poop all over again."
Can either of you deny this? Is it likely either of your candidates will rise above this summary?
Is this choice really what anybody wants?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: +0.70. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: -2.50. U.S. equity futures trade little changed amid upbeat action overseas. The S&P 500 futures hover within a point of fair value. The underperformance of U.S. futures relative to global equities reflects the wait-and-see approach ahead of today's policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. Yesterday, the market rallied after Wall Street Journal's Jon Hilsenrath indicated the FOMC plans to ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'