3/22/2012 5:37 PM ET|
Why oil speculators are in charge
Promises of more production and shipping from Saudi Arabia barely moved the price of oil and gas. Plus: The country investors should be watching.
Talk is cheap. Especially when you're in the middle of an oil price war.
So Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi certainly didn't expect global oil markets to send the price of crude tumbling just because he said "I think high prices are unjustified today" in a March 20 news conference in Qatar.
That's why he paired talk with action -- or at least with talk of the actions that the Saudis had taken or could take. Saudi Arabia had an extra 2.5 million barrels a day of production capacity that it could bring on line, Saudi oil storage reserves around the world were full and a newly hired fleet of super tankers was on en route to the United States.
But al-Naimi must have been disappointed in the market's reaction to this salvo. On that day the price of Brent crude, the European benchmark, fell just $1.59 a barrel, or 1.3%, to close at $124.12. Brent crude is up, as of the close on March 20, by 15% in 2012.
One day's battle doesn't decide a war, certainly, but the Saudis have pulled out their big guns, and they didn't make much of an impression.
Is there anything Saudi Arabia, or the governments of Europe and the United States, can do to stop oil from moving higher? Or have the speculators won a free hand to drive up oil prices -- and the price of gasoline -- until the day they decide to take their profits?
Let's start by looking at what the Saudis did and why those actions didn't impress the global oil market.
Saudis' big effort draws a 'So what?'
First, al-Naimi talked up Saudi Arabia's ability to raise production. In November, the Saudis increased production to 10.05 million barrels a day. That was the highest level of production in more than 30 years. The country will pump about 9.9 million barrels a day in March and April, and it has the capacity to produce as much as 12.5 million barrels a day, the Saudis say. That would be more than enough to make up for the 1 million barrels a day from Iran that would be lost from global supplies if the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries stop buying Iranian oil as a part of a program of sanctions designed to end that country's efforts to build a nuclear weapon.
Second, al-Naimi ridiculed the idea that the Iranians could cause a global oil crisis by shutting the narrow Strait of Hormuz. "If you believe Hormuz will close, I will sell you the Egyptian pyramids." (Who knew there was a Saudi equivalent of the Brooklyn cry of "Hey, Mister, do you want to buy a bridge?")
Besides scoffing at the Iranian ability to close the waterway, which handles 30% of the world's seaborne trade in oil, al-Naimi pointed out that his country had filled its storage facilities in Rotterdam, Netherlands; Sidi Kerir, Egypt; and Okinawa, Japan. Together, those storage sites hold about 10 million barrels of oil, he noted.
Third, Vela, the shipping arm of government-owned oil producer Saudi Aramco, has an oil express headed for the U.S. In 2011, Vela hired one very large crude oil carrier, a tanker capable of carrying 2 million barrels of oil, every other month, to ship oil to the U.S. Vela has stepped up its hiring rate -- this month -- to 11 very large crude carriers. The message is clear, the Saudis hope: U.S. refineries will have all the oil they need, no matter what happens with Iran, the sanctions and the Strait of Hormuz. (U.S. oil refineries are key to the global prices of refined oil products, because the U.S. is a major exporter of refined petroleum products.)
All in all, that's a pretty impressive lineup of action. So why didn't it knock more off the price of oil than a meager 1.3%?
What the speculators know
A big part of the market's decision to shrug off the Saudi oil minister was a sense that there wasn't anything new in al-Naimi's action plan. Traders who have bid up the price of oil already had these moves figured into their scenario.
So, for example, anyone speculating on the rising price of oil knows the Saudi numbers by heart -- and doubts that the math works out the way al-Naimi says it does. The Saudi oil minister dismissed fears of production shortfalls from the Sudan and Yemen, predicted that Libya's oil production would rapidly recover from the country's civil war, and looked forward to increased production from Iraq. If you're speculating that oil prices will rise, you're operating on a very different assessment of production from these four countries.
And speculators also don't believe the Saudi estimate of how much additional oil the country could pump. In February the International Energy Agency reduced its estimate of the maximum output from Saudi wells to 11.88 million barrels a day, from its previous estimate of 12 million barrels. That puts the agency's estimate more than 600,000 barrels a day below al-Naimi's figures for maximum Saudi production.
There's also the little matter of how much of that "spare" capacity is actually spare. Domestic demand for oil in Saudi Arabia is at a seasonal low. It will rise when summer plunges the country into peak air-conditioning season.
It didn't hurt the speculators' case, either, when on Wednesday the U.S. Energy Information Administration said that U.S. inventories of crude fell by 1.2 million barrels to 346 million barrels in the week ended March 16. Analysts had expected an increase of about 2.2 million barrels. Gasoline inventories dropped as well, by 1.2 million barrels. This is supposed to be the seasonal shoulder period when demand is low and inventories build in advance of the summer driving season.
What everyone knows of the government budgets in the big oil-producing countries of Saudi Arabia and Russia also makes the speculative trade on higher oil prices more attractive. Russia and Saudi Arabia need $100-a-barrel oil to bring their national budgets into balance. If you're a trader in oil, that serves as a floor to the downside.
When the Saudis and the other members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries say that $100 a barrel is about right for the global price of oil, they mean it. Even oil producers, such as the Saudis, who want to avoid an oil price shock that would slow the global economy, aren't looking to cut the cash payments and subsidies that they've promised and risk domestic upheaval. For an oil speculator, that limits risk if you're wrong about oil prices going up.
More from MoneyShow.com:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Where is goddam congress and the administration and the SEC to try to curb commodities speculation...did'nt China do this?
sickening that Washington just sits on its Azz while the oil barons fleece the country!
There have always been commodity speculators driving the petroleum prices. This will continue until Congress steps in with laws prohibiting speculation upon those commodities which are the life-blood of our nation. There are, of course, powerful lobby groups which protect the profiteers, many of whom are said to be members of Congress themselves.
The next time we're given a shot at the ballot box we should seize that opportunity in order to VOTE THE INCUMBENTS OUT!
Bottom line: When gasoline average hits $5/gallon this summer, The economy will tank (no pun intended)
With the average gas tank of 15 gallons and at $/5 gallon, most people will be shelling out close to $300/month between commuting and other trips. Without an increase or compensation in income, where will people tighten their belts? No road trip vacations, eating out a lot less, only buying neccessities and avoiding large purchases. The parallel rise in diesel will drive the cost of transporting ALL goods and the resulting increase passed along to the consumer. One does not have to hold a masters degree in economics to allow this to happen. Only the greed and self interests of the oil industry and oil speculators will be the cause and effect of the economic crash of 2012
Can someone produce the names of these speculators? I think once the American public knew who they were things would change.
The speculation of oil must stop.
The President said he will support a piece of the pipeline, but he is dropping the ball. What you need to do Mr. President is introduce a bill to stop all this greed on oil speculation. Either nationalize oil (energy) and then we will see how many house and senate republicans want to come on board and sign it into law, or find another way to stop this greed. I'd be very interested just how many republicans would sign such a bill cause I need to vote in 11/12. I want to get rid of those politicians who aren't interested in helping Americans.
Some of you posting here are quite right, the problem is the government.
OIL has become too entrenched in every aspect of our daily lives to leave the price controlled by the wealthy. Remove it from the commodity market NOW!
One word says it all, greed!
Why is all the US oil going overseas. If the US has oil this oil should stay in the US
again why greed! No one cares about the average person if your at the top of the greed pac.
The auto industry had 30 years to come up with a car that gives 100 miles per gallon but
why didn't this happen greed!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 added just over a point, holding its weekly gain at 1.0% while the Nasdaq lost 0.4%.
The major averages began the day on an upbeat note, but relinquished their opening gains during the first 90 minutes of action. The early sentiment was boosted by a better-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report for February (175K versus Briefing.com consensus 163K), but a closer look into the report suggested that ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'