2/25/2014 7:45 PM ET|
3 reasons to be all in with stocks
It's not for everybody: Most of us can't resist the urge to sell during a downturn. But if you understand the risks and keep realistic expectations, a 100-percent equity portfolio isn't as crazy as it sounds.
My individual retirement account money is 100 percent invested in stock index funds. Let me tell you why.
It's not because I think the stock market is about to take off. It's not because I read some guru's economic tip of the year. And it's not because I don't understand the risk of owning equities (equities is simply another word for stocks).
It is precisely because I do understand the risk, I have realistic expectations, and my choice is perfectly suited for my goals. Let me explain the three reasons behind my choice:
I consider risk the most misused word in finance. Everyone thinks they know what it means, but no one really does. How about a definition of risk everyone can understand? Ask two simple questions:
- Can I lose any money? If the answer is no, it's a safe investment.
- Can I lose all of my money? If the answer is yes, find out what circumstances it would take to make that happen.
When you own a diversified portfolio of stock index funds, in order to lose all your money, thousands of the largest companies in the world would have to fail at once. Could this happen? Yes, but if it does, I don't think I'll much care about how much money is in my IRA. It's more likely I'll be figuring out how to protect my property and grow my own food.
Could my investments be worth half their value in a few months? Absolutely. But what do I care? I don't need the money in a few months. I need it in 20 years.
The fluctuations my account value will go through over the next 20 years is volatility. The risk in volatility for the average person is they get emotional, or don't understand the investments they own and exit after a big bear market. I know I'm not going to do that, so volatility is irrelevant to me.
The real risk is that stocks simply don't do well over the next 20 years, and I get to retirement and realize I would have had a better outcome by sticking with safe investments. That's a risk I'm willing to accept.
I don't expect my IRA to be up 30 percent this year. I don't even expect it to go up 10 percent this year. I don't really care what it does this year. I do expect that if I leave it alone over 20 years it will deliver a decent return.
If I get a bad 20 years, I think I'll still earn more than zero. If I get a good 20 years, I'd expect it would average 12 percent or more a year. An average annual return of somewhere between zero and 12 percent is what I expect.
Why so broad a range? Because I have no control over what market conditions the next 20 years will deliver. All I have control over is how I invest. And I know if I kept all of my money in safe choices, it wouldn't have a chance of earning 12 percent a year, although it would earn more than zero.
I also expect that around every eight to 12 months, my accounts will drop about 10 to 15 percent in value. Why do I expect that? That's about how often market corrections occur. In addition, I expect that a few times over the next 20 years, I might watch my account values drop by 30 to 50 percent. Like market corrections, bear markets are not rare.
Because my expectations are in line with reality, I am completely comfortable investing in equities. In addition, it is the choice that most aligns with the goals of my retirement money at this point in my life.
How do I know my retirement money has 20 years? Well, I think I'll likely be working until age 70. Not because I have to, but because I get bored easily and enjoy work. I'm currently in my 40s.
Retirement money is a protected asset when it comes to creditors. That means that even if I royally screw up and end up filing bankruptcy (I certainly don't anticipate that, but life can throw some nasty curve balls), I still wouldn't cash in my retirement money to try to save the situation.
I also know I won't panic and bail out of the market when it goes down, because I know it will go down from time to time.
Put all this knowledge together, and I know my retirement money has at least 20 years. My goal over that time frame is to earn the highest return possible. Deciding to invest it all in stock index funds is the option most likely to meet my goal. I realize higher returns are not a certainty. I also know that as I move closer to retirement, I will make changes to my portfolio and gradually add in safer choices.
I have other non-retirement money. And you know what? It is 100 percent invested in safe investments. It earns almost nothing. Why do I leave it there? Because my livelihood is tied to the financial markets, and when the bear markets I expect come along, it is likely my income will go down. During those times, I will need cash reserves, and I don't want those tied to the stock market.
Even if it is your retirement money, and you have twenty or more years, a 100 percent equity portfolio is not for most people. Too many people mistake volatility for a permanent loss, and are prone to buying high and selling low.
Regardless of the final allocation of your investments, you can become a better investor by asking questions about risk, setting realistic expectations and having clear goals.
More from U.S. News & World Report
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Additionally, I plowed every cent I could into stocks, retirement or not - I kept so little in the bank that when we found great prices on several overseas vacations that were too good to pass up (like $2150/each total for two weeks in China including all flights, meals, tours, etc. and a 5-day Yangtze Cruise from the U.S. East Coast), I'd charge it on a credit card and then furiously pay it off over the next few months - which was cheaper than selling the stocks and pay capital gains.
I retired at 56. As I approached 56, I pulled most of my money out of stocks to ensure I'd have enough income to bridge the time gap between retirement and when retirement income-vehicles kicked-in. Consequently I got out just before the crash of 2008. But 2010, I was putting it back in and now, blessed with more income than expenses, I've moved 2/3 of my portfolio back into defensive stocks. They'll be good in a decade when I need them.
The foocking Batch should be fired and her pension taken away.
Your 5th Amendment rights do not include the right to refuse to answer questions put to you by your employers (congress/citizens). You can not refuse to answer our questions and expect to keep your job. If you do not answer our questions you should be fired with no benefits, no severance and no pension. Everything in your workspace should be confiscated until an investigation can be completed. Your choice, answer the questions or exercise your right and be fired.
When used in the context of the Stock Market, it is often used to delude folks into thinking the past will be our Future. That is a False Assumption based on false HOPE that Robbing Peter to Paul Paul doesn't have any Major consequences.
Basically, it's terrified hold to Infinity types who want you to believe that between the bear and bull Markets, the Regression to the Mean will always be higher returns. That just ignores our current and Future National Debt issues along with current and Future Global Economic issues. IN a nutshell, it's false hope based on living with Alice in Wonderland.
Investors who are in the Markets for the long term should understand that Regression to the Means concerning Stocks is more Theory than FACT. In 20 years, our National Debt will be well over $40Trillion and interest Rates will be FAR, far higher. Therefore interest income will be Far, far Higher. 100% vested in equities is therefore Foolery.
I believe you forgot about what if the Mutual Fi=und goes under or it was a Bernie Madoff Scam !
That;s why I mostly invest in Individual Stocks and build my own personal "Fund" - It is much safer and a Heck of lot less costly ! Buy - Hold - Retire !
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] Equity indices extended this week's losses with a broad-based retreat. The S&P 500 fell 0.6% to end the week lower by 1.1%, while the Russell 2000 (-1.1%) finished with a 0.9% decline since last Friday.
Staying true to the theme observed throughout the week, the energy sector (-1.5%) tumbled out of the gate, thus dragging the broader market down with it. Once again, dollar strength and crude oil weakness contributed to sector's underperformance, but the ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|