Deal or no deal, our AAA rating is toast
Even if a deal comes through before Tuesday, it's unlikely that the government can cooperate well enough to prevent a downgrade.
By Howard R. Gold, editor-at-large, MoneyShow.com
It’s been a hot summer, and it’s been even hotter in Washington, D.C., where Democrats and Republicans have been burning down the House with a pitched battle over the debt ceiling, the cap that Congress puts on the national debt.
Usually it’s a mundane bit of legislative business barely worthy of C-Span. Congress hikes spending and then authorizes an increase in the debt ceiling to pay for it. It’s happened 78 times since 1960.
But this year it will likely cause the US’s prized AAA credit rating to go up in smoke.
Newly elected Tea Party Republican congressmen have held fast to their campaign promises to cut spending. (You can read my recent column on the Tea Party’s “moment of truth” here.) So, they have demanded spending cuts at least equal to the roughly $2 trillion the debt ceiling will have to be increased from its current $14.3 trillion to cover rising expenditures.
Post continues after video:
If that doesn’t happen by August 2, President Obama and many others have warned the government won’t be able to meet all its obligations, including interest payments on the debt, military pay, Social Security checks, what have you. If we can’t, it could mean a default by the US government, just like Argentina and Mexico did in days of yore. (Read my recent column about the looming "debt cloud" here.)
Speaker of the House John Boehner and other Republican leaders also have said that default is not an option. But as a polarized Washington seems incapable of reaching a compromise, the ratings agencies have stepped in with more and more dire warnings.
Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, and Fitch Ratings all have warned that failure to raise the debt ceiling would trigger a downgrade of US government debt.
S&P in particular has also raised the stakes, and quite publicly. The kind of short-term fix so popular in Washington—like the ones that are being bandied about as I write this—that raises the debt ceiling for six months or so, with maybe $1 trillion or so in spending cuts, may forestall a technical default, but still may result in a downgrade, S&P officials have said.
I’ll save who I think is primarily responsible for this mess for my political blog, but I will say this: You can kiss the AAA rating of US Treasury debt goodbye.
If a miracle happens, we may be able to forestall it for a while. But without a huge turnaround in Washington’s broken political culture, I don’t think this Congress and president will enact the dramatic changes S&P has strongly suggested are necessary for us to stay in the elite club of AAA-rated sovereigns.
They include Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
The philosophical and political differences between Democrats and Republicans are so sharp that no long-term agreement on spending and revenues seems possible. They live in two parallel universes, with two completely different visions of what problems face the country.
And if they can’t strike a compromise with the Sword of Damocles of default hanging over their heads, when are they going to do it? In 2012, when they may face primary challenges and well-financed general election opponents?
This may sound like a digression, but it’s actually at the heart of S&P’s warnings.
“There is at least a one-in-two likelihood that we could lower the long-term rating on the US within the next 90 days,” S&P wrote on July 14, when it put US debt on CreditWatch with negative implications.
“Despite months of negotiations, the two sides remain at odds on fundamental fiscal policy issues. Consequently, we believe there is an increasing risk of a substantial policy stalemate enduring beyond any near-term agreement to raise the debt ceiling,” it continued.
In fact, it warned that it “may lower the long-term rating on the US by one or more notches into the 'AA' category in the next three months, if we conclude that Congress and the Administration have not achieved a credible solution to the rising US government debt burden and are not likely to achieve one in the foreseeable future.”
“An inability to reach an agreement now could indicate that an agreement will not be reached for several more years,” S&P wrote. “We view an inability to timely agree and credibly implement medium-term fiscal consolidation policy as inconsistent with a 'AAA' sovereign rating.”
S&P even spelled out what it thought would be necessary to maintain the AAA rating. “If Congress and the Administration reach an agreement of about $4 trillion, and if we conclude that such an agreement would be enacted and maintained throughout the decade, we could, other things unchanged, affirm the 'AAA' long-term rating on the US.”
In this remarkable report, the agency laid out several possible scenarios for losing and regaining the AAA rating, which I won’t go into, but you can read at StandardandPoors.com.
Neither Moody’s nor S&P would provide officials for me to interview for this column, and S&P issued a statement that said: “Standard & Poor’s has chosen not to comment on the many and varying proposals that have arisen in the current debate. Any statement to the contrary is inaccurate.”
Maybe so, but it you draw a road map, do you really need to fill in the name of every one-horse town along the way?
In fact, a top S&P official appeared to be easing the pain of a downgrade in advance. In a video interview on S&P’s Web site, executive managing director Paul Coughlin said: “That’s not the end of the world. Lots of countries would give their right arm for a AA+ rating.”
That would put us right up there with Belgium and New Zealand. With AA, we’d be in the class of Bermuda and Qatar.
Losing the AAA would probably hurt the economy through higher borrowing costs for the government, corporations, and consumers, especially those who have adjustable-rate debt, and we’d likely see a stock market decline. (My colleague Jim Jubak spelled out what a default would look like here.)
But most of all it would be a terrible blow to our national pride and prestige, capping a decade of decline from the commanding heights we bestrode at the start of the Millennium.
It gives me no joy but considerable sadness to reluctantly agree with Barry Knapp, head US-equity strategist at Barclays Capital, that a downgrading of the US’s credit rating is inevitable.
As the great Bob Dylan wrote, you don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. So long, AAA, it’s been good to know you.
4 Income Stocks Safer Than Treasuries
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Other than our precious freedom, and a strong military.... just where do we lead anymore? The Country has been taken over by zealots and radicals with extreme agendas. Our education system is in the tank. Our kids don't want to learn. Our manufacturing capability and inventiveness is lost to other countries.
We are losing out as the financial leader of the World. No one seems to respect us anymore...but always want our diminishing money which we are always willing to hand out. USA research & development has been killed by regulation and litigation. Political correctness has completely stifled free expression and casual discourse.
The AAA rating isn't the only thing we've lost. We've lost out way trying to create the perfect society which is unrealistic and accomplished nothing more than creating a undisciplined society with no sense of accountability or responsibility.
The saddest thing is the damage that POLITICIANS have done to our country. They should hang their heads in shame. But, then so should the average "American Joe." We've allowed our politicians to give our money away as they see fit. They don't have this right, but through our indifference, we have allowed them to give themselves raises; divorce themselves from Social Security while we fund their own retirement benefits; give them full health benefits; allow them to waste our dollars on pork and wars that they won't let us win; allow them to give tax loopholes and breaks to the richest corporations; ad naseum.
It's time to let our POLITICIANS know that we DEMAND better than they have given us for the past 20 years or so. . . . or, you can kiss America goodbye!
My fear now that millions of Americans that are holding on by their fingernails ( me included ) will suffer immensely. This new budget will only favor the rich and powerful special interests.
The only thing I see now that will stem the tide will be a massive march on Washington ( much like the civil rights movement of the 60's ) where millions of Americans demand real reform and real "economic equity " for its citizens.
We get the governement we keep. How is it that we let about 455 people (senate, house, pres) control the will of 310 million?
This is the result of more citizens watching American Idol than plugging into the government/election process.
Everyone these days are out for themselves...sorry folks! You all are or you would be e-mailing the President and your Congressmen\women at least once a month like I do saying how I think about the way they are handling the economy and not helping the middle class (now called the working poor).
It's sad, but I'm 56 years old and have never seen elected officials so out of touch with the needs of the many people like me that need relief.
Heaven forbid and hopefully if we make it until the 2012 elections, I MAY RUN FOR ELECTED OFFICE AND REALLY "MAKE A CHANGE"!
If the U.S. Government defaults on their debts to the world I'm afraid that lowering the credit rating is going to be the least of our worries!
What will China and the other countries do if we just all of sudden tell them "we're not going to pay back the money we owe and we don't know when payments will resume if at all!" Will they foreclose on the white house? Take away our statue of liberty and sell it for scrap to pay the debt? Maybe take New York as their own?
After all why shouldn't the other countries take away our stuff, The U.S. Government would come in and foreclose on my home if I default on my income taxes.
Hey, maybe the U.S. Government can talk the corporations into giving THEM a "stimulus deal" LMFAO I'm sure that every corporation feels that the U.S. government is "too big to fail" and surely they'll step up and get our country moving in the right direction again. yea, right.
Hang on to your wallets folks! There's a financial hurricane headed right at us!
Raising the debt ceiling is not about paying our bills, it is about BORROWING MORE MONEY!
Obama and the Dems in 2006 and 2008 ran on the fact that Bush and the Repubs spent too much money. The Dems took over and made what the Rupubs spent look like chup change. That is why we are here today.
The UK just had to do massive spending cuts to keep it's AAA rating. They realized that bigger Gov't isn't better Gov't.
Congress here is only talking about cutting $100 billion a year. The deficit is OVER $1,500 billion a year.
Real cuts would have to be 15 times larger than the Republican plan.
What do you want to bet that the President & Congressional Leaders will still draw their check while everyone else does without.
Maybe we should cut out "All" foriegn aid to other countries, mind our own damn business and take care of our own!!!
The problem is the government. I think we can all agree on that. Not only is it irresponsible fiscally, but it is irrresponsible with respect to how it stifles innovation and education. It's a cycle of stupidity and irresponsiblity begotten by the same.
If we can easily identify the problem - in rather overwhelming numbers - why are we so reluctant to resolve that problem? Why do we allow the farce to continue?
And let's make one thing very clear:
"WE" are not the ones that have gotten the country into this mess. The federal government is on the verge of a downgrade or default because the federal government - over several generations - has been irresponsible and inept. They are now about to inflict some serious pain on all of us.
So, what are we going to do? Nothing? Play the political party blame game? Refuse to acknowledge that the entire system is broken? Pretend that all will be good because, after all, this is the United States?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).
Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|