3/25/2014 6:30 PM ET|
My so-called market: Are stocks going totally '90s?
Analysts see many similarities between then and now, such as persistently low inflation, partisan gridlock in Washington and a jobless recovery.
Early in 1992, Time magazine projected that the nascent economic recovery would be "one of the slowest in history and the next decade one of lowered expectations." That was the conventional wisdom and, at the time, seemed eminently reasonable.
It also turned out to be completely wrong. The Internet and huge productivity gains propelled above-average economic growth and a rip-roaring, "Cult of Equity" bull market that surged into the year 2000. We spent and borrowed like mad and eased into fluffy college majors.
Now, some on Wall Street are wondering if we're about to replay some version of that '90s mix tape. Liz Ann Sonders of Schwab (SCHW) and Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research have been discussing this theme of late with clients.
"The global economic scene is increasingly reminiscent of the 1990s, when the U.S. economy and stocks outperformed relative to the rest of the world," wrote Yardeni last week. "Back then, emerging markets submerged when the Asian Tigers were hit by a currency crisis in 1997 and Russia defaulted on its debt in 1998."
"Today," he adds, "the high-tech revolution that started in the 1990s is spreading to lots of other industries that are using technology to innovate and to boost productivity. Once again, the U.S. seems to be leading the way. Emerging markets are submerging again. Europe's recovery is lackluster. . . . Commodity prices are flat-lining."
In her March 17 note, "Objects in the Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer Than They Are: A Look Back at the 1990s," Sonders tallies the many similarities between then and now, including extremely easy monetary policy transitioning to some semblance of normalcy; persistently low inflation; a major developing-market deleveraging (Japan then vs. the eurozone today); rising interest in stocks and partisan gridlock in Washington.
Sonders reminds us: "Partly due to the characteristics of a post-financial crisis era, the mid-1990s was considered the first 'jobless' recovery, although it followed a much less-severe recession than the current 'jobless' recovery."
The Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan, she notes, was the first major global central bank to begin tightening monetary policy two decades ago, while Germany's Bundesbank and the Bank of Japan (JP) were still easing. Today, by comparison, with the Fed tapering quantitative easing, the U.S. is again out in front of most other global central banks (save for the Bank of England) -- all while inflation remains low with a muted risk of a spike-up from these levels, even if wage growth accelerates here (as it did in the mid-1990s).
As for markets: As in the 1990s, shares in the U.S. have wrested leadership from out-of-favor emerging markets such as Russia, Brazil and China. "Emerging markets," observes Sonders, "are now facing long-term structural problems amid rolling currency crises; not all that dissimilar to the Asian currency crisis/Russian default/LTCM [Long-Term Capital Management] failure era of the late-1990s."
The U.S. market, which bottomed five years ago, appears to be in the first few innings of another stretch of outperformance to developing economies -- in sharp contrast to the state of affairs during America's lost market decade, the 2000s.
The Schwab strategist further quotes a January report by the firm BCA Research to compare today's deflationary eurozone to 1990s Japan: "In the first half of the 1990s, Japan was struggling with debt deflation. Economic growth in Japan fell apart, profits collapsed and the economy was marching toward sustained price deflation. . . . Today's eurozone is yesterday's Japan: Excluding Germany, the rest of the euro zone economy remains mired in stagnation."
There are, of course, major differences between today's backdrop and that of the early-to-mid 1990s. Never has the Fed thrown so much stimulus at an economic slowdown, the 2008-09 likes of which was more painful than anything seen since the 1930s. Today's profit margins are unusually fat. Income inequality is worse.
The giddy 1990s, moreover, set us up for the triple trauma of the following decade: the tech crash, Sept. 11, and then the housing collapse and Wall Street's near-death experience. So, says Sonders, it stands to reason that a thrice-bitten skepticism stands in the way of a full 1990s redux.
Is it really different this time? It should be remembered that then-Fed Chairman Greenspan gnomically warned of irrational exuberance three-plus years before that bubble hit peak swell. With that kind of lead time in mind, current rookie chief Janet Yellen might want to start drafting something equivalently indecipherable soonish.
More from Bloomberg Businessweek
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
By Jim Jubak
A new era of bad money
As countries continue to create money out of thin air to dodge debt crises, where will this all end?
I think it's clear by this point in the aftermath of the global financial crisis that all the various local crises have been "solved" to date by the creation of vast sums of money essentially out of thin air on the official balance sheets of central banks such as the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank and on the unofficial balance sheets of, say, China's banking system. I think it's equally clear that, for all the talk about economic reforms creating growth, or austerity creating growth, or financial market confidence creating growth, the most likely "solution" going forward is the continued creation of vast sums of money essentially out of thin air."
March 24, 2014 8:58 AM ET
By Ben Moshinsky
Coroners in London are preparing to investigate two apparent suicides as unexpected deaths by finance workers around the world have raised concerns about mental health and stress levels in the industry. "
March 25, 2014 6:09 PM ET
By Douwe Miedem
WASHINGTON (Reuters) Market operators' failure to cooperate to provide the Commodity Futures Trading Commission with adequate data is preventing the regulator from effectively monitoring the global swaps market, according to sources familiar with the matter.
They said it means the CFTC, which is the derivatives market regulator, has yet to meet a major goal it was set after the credit crisis: to get on top of what is happening in the opaque $690 trillion market so that it can be confident of preventing another blowup."
Predicting the future based on what happened before. Yeah, real clever. Not.
You tell them, Homer King,
I think it's because he [KOO] went to a progressive public school where they didn't teach the kids ANYTHING, but how to be good little socialists. He DOES sound as though he hasn't [and probably never WILL] have an original thought in his brain. I know he sounds idiotic, but with SOME people, you have to think of they way they've been brought up to accept every little thing they've been told by [socialistic, statist, "progressive"] teachers as the TRUTH FROM ON HIGH. It's the new PC religion. And you know that there's nothing worse to the health of a freedom loving, capitalistic society than a brainwashed idiot, who spews the party line, as if it was God's truth
Hey Homer King:
KOO ????? Have an original idea? Are you kidding??? LOL
I mean... I just don't know what to do...buy gold , stocks, or fine jewelry....Maybe I should just stock up on canned spam and tuna from walmart and call it a day!
Would love to see the term premyears used the first ten years of a new century!
I'm betting that technology will boost the service sector. That's why I started my latest venture . Guess what? Less than two weeks in and we already have over a hundred contractors and users registered. Check it out. I think it wil revolutioninze the way we shop the services we need done.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished a down week on a cautious note with small caps leading the retreat. The Russell 2000 lost 0.5%, widening its weekly decline to 2.6%, while the S&P 500 shed 0.3%. The benchmark index ended the week lower by 2.7%.
This morning, the market was provided a basis to rebound with the July employment report, which was just right for the policy doves (209K versus Briefing.com consensus 220K). It showed payroll growth that was weaker than expected, ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|