9/21/2012 4:47 PM ET|
Stocks doomed by demographics?
Strategists are divided over the question, yet recent history provides investors with little guidance.
The stock market got a big boost on Sept. 13 when the Federal Reserve announced it would be pumping money into the financial system for as long as it takes to lift the economy. But what if the Fed is up against a force that's stronger than money -- demographics?
Last week I came across a gloomy analysis on the aging of America's impact on the economy. Then I found strategists who are using demographics to make a bullish case. Here's a look at the details.
An economics blog posted a depressing speech, given by author and newsletter writer Harry Dent, called "A Decade of Volatility: Demographics, Debt, and Deflation." "There is," Dent says, "simply no way the Fed can win the battle it's currently waging against deflation, because there are 76 million Baby Boomers who increasingly want to save, not spend. Old people don't buy houses!"
He explains that the peak of the recent housing boom featured upper-middle-class families living in 4,000-square-foot McMansions. "About 10 years from now," he says, "what will they do? They'll downsize to a 2,000-square-foot townhouse. What do they need all those bedrooms for? The kids are gone. They don't visit anymore. Ten years after that, where are they? They're in 200-square-foot nursing homes. Ten years later, where are they? They're in a 20-square-foot grave plot. That's the future of real estate. That's why real estate has not bounced in Japan after 21 years. That's why it won't bounce here in the U.S. either. For every young couple that gets married, has babies and buys a house, there's an older couple moving into a nursing home or dying."
Would the gentleman like Prozac gravy with that hunk of cold turkey?
Dent tracks a 46-year leading indicator that he says identifies a predictable peak in spending of the average household. He notes that the baby boom birth index started to rise in 1937 and continued its ascent until 1961, when it began falling. The result: "Add 46 to 1937, and you get a boom that starts in 1983. Add 46 to 61, and you get a boom that ends in 2007."
And you know how marvelous things have been since 2007. Dent's argumentative upshot: Painful, chronic deflation is here for quite some time. And there's not much anyone can do about it. Lest you attempt to look for demographic silver linings, he urges, "Don't hold your breath for the echo boomer generation." That would be the group born between the early 1980s and mid-'90s.
Well, Tobias Levkovich, Citi's chief U.S. equity strategist, put out a note this week that enthused about that very cohort. It got picked up by Bloomberg charts whiz Dave Wilson and by Josh Brown's Reformed Broker blog. Levkovich posits that demographics are about to shift in favor of equities for the first time since the 1990s. Saving and investing by the echo boomers, writes Levkovich, "would generate a new set of equity fund inflows." Levkovich plotted a century-long chart of the number of people aged 35 to 39 and found that it tracked fairly well against stock prices. That relationship suggests a coming spike in stocks as echo boomers reach that potent age level. This age group is on the verge of increasing for the next 17 years.
Dave Wilson charted the number of Americans who were 35 to 39 years old at midyear, as compiled by the U.S. Commerce Department, comparing it with the Standard & Poor's 500 Index's ($NDX) performance since 1980. At least where equity valuations are concerned, the picture does not lend weight to Dent's inevitable, inexorable deflation thesis.
For Brown's part, he and business partner Barry Ritholtz observed that the timeline of a boom in 35- to 39-year-olds "coincides perfectly with the time frame we're guesstimating as the end of the secular bear market we've been in since 2000. (They tend to run 17 years on average.)"
Meanwhile, at the intersection of these two worldviews is the lesson of the past four years: The stock market can inflate in a broadly deflationary economy.
More from Bloomberg Businessweek:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Here is the problem with opinion #2. A lot of people come of age to start saving which boost stock prices. Sounds great. One problem, you can only get away with that if there are enough other people spending money to generate higher and higher profits to match the rising stock price. Otherwise, all you get is a big, fat bubble with P/E levels approaching the late 1990 dot com years. Everyone thought those years were great but in the end where did it get anyone? Some cashed out ahead no doubt, some broke even, and others lost a lot. You need sustained growth not artificial, bloated growth.
The fed is up against a force alright, it's called obamazombie math, beranke doesn't know what the hell he's doing and that's painfully obvious, how many times are the obamazombies gonna triple down on failed policies, 3.6yrs of this nonsense and the economy is CONTRACTING, not expanding, unemployment is going up in state after state, wow!! didn't see that coming did we!!!
an hey! lookey here!! all you democraps worried about fair share and the rich don't pay enouh blah, blah, and more blah, Mitt Romney gave 7million dollars to various charities, that's SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS, 40% of his earnings, wanna know who much that idiot plugs biden gave to charity?? 5000 grand, 'nuff said isn't it. you know I bet if you add ALL the charitiable contributions any democrap ever gave to anyone, it wouldn't at up to 7 dollars much less 7million of 'em, but they sure do luv spending John Q. Public's money don't they!! crony capitalism, failed after failed "green" energy jobs which of course go nowhere, produce nothing, no products and no jobs, and there's no market for 'em to begin with!!!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market has languished today, yet it's a stretch to say that sellers have been in total control of the proceedings.
The A/D line at the NYSE favors decliners by a slim 8-to-7 margin; meanwhile, advancers are actually ahead of decliners at the Nasdaq by nearly an 8-to-5 margin.
Those A/D lines pretty much sum things up in the sense that they convey some mixed trading action, which has persisted for most of the day.
Notably, the Russell 2000 is making a ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|