
Markets could face rocky week
Watch Spanish bonds, Apple, Caterpillar, McDonald's, Ford and Facebook.
But that's not all investors should be thinking about. The government will offer its first estimate of gross domestic product on Friday. And it could be a stinker.
Among the earnings due this week are reports from McDonald's (MCD) on Monday; Apple (AAPL) on Tuesday; Boeing (BA), Ford Motor (F) and Caterpillar (CAT) on Wednesday: Amazon.com (AMZN), Facebook (FB) and Exxon Mobil (XOM) on Thursday; and Chevron (CVX) on Friday.
Why Spain continues to roil markets
The reason for the Asian pullback and the European sell-off was worries about Spain. The region of Murcia, in southeastern Spain, may need a bailout. Murcia would be the third Spanish region to warn about cash problems. Catalonia and Valencia have already signaled they need help.
Spain's banks already need help. There is a growing worry that the Spanish government will need to be bailed out.
Spain's 10-year bond yield hit 7.52% this morning, something that has never happened in the euro era.
The other issue was Greece, which could run out of cash soon -- literally -- if the eurozone and the IMF see the Greeks aren't meeting their austerity agreements. "If Greece doesn’t fulfill those conditions, then there can be no more payments," German Vice Chancellor Philipp Roesler said in a Sunday television interview.
The Greek and Spanish worries pushed the euro lower against the dollar. The euro was trading at $1.20919, its lowest level since 2005.
Here are the key issues for the week:
The euro's slump. It may actually good for Europe because it will make European exports cheaper, but the falling euro means the dollar is rising. That hurts U.S. exports and depresses corporate profits of big U.S. companies. IBM said currency translation forced it to reduce its reported second-quarter revenue by $1 billion. You will see the currency issue today when McDonald's reports, but it will be an issue all week, especially with Boeing and Caterpillar on Wednesday and 3M (MMM) on Thursday.
Apple's growth. Apple reports after Tuesday's close. There's a growing worry that sales growth for its iPhone may be slowing as some users delay purchases until its new iPhone 5 comes out in the fall.
The housing recovery. It may not be a big recovery, but housing is recovering. Partly it's due to fewer foreclosures coming onto the market. That's forcing big institutional investors to engage in bidding wars to buy up blocks of foreclosed homes as quickly as possible. But there is more construction of apartments, and even single-family home sales are showing strength. You can see this in the non-seasonally adjusted data from the National Association of Realtors recent existing-home sales. Sherwin-Williams (SHW) last week said paint demand is growing, with the North American market much stronger than Europe or Latin America. Thursday's pending home sales report from the Realtors will be important.
Ford's European business. Ford warned recently that its European operations may show a second-quarter loss because of the slumping economy. The question on Wednesday will be how bad is the European business and how will that problem affect Ford's U.S. results.
Facebook's first quarterly report as a public company. The social-networking site reports its second-quarter results on Thursday. And what investors may focus in on is the revenue growth rate. First-quarter revenue was up 32.5% from a year earlier to $901 million, but year-over-year growth rates have been slipping.
Big Oil's challenges in a slowing economy. Crude oil in New York is off 7.5% this year and was headed lower today. So was Brent crude. It's a function of crude oil's being priced in dollars. If the dollar is higher, crude will move lower. That may affect the guidance offered by Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) and Exxon on Thursday and Chevron on Friday.
The flight to safety. Many investors are pushing cash to Germany and U.S. government securities to be sure their money is safe. Some short-term yields of German securities are negative, meaning investors are paying for the safety.
Gooch41,
Gooch41, I don't agree. I will assume the person carrying a weapon, first knows how to use it. second I will assume that said person remains reasonably calm. Both big assumptions. How would a couple of off duty cops re-acted? Or military? All gun fights and combat are chaos. Yes there is greater chance that more might havebeen hit. But I assure you, but a few incoming rounds would have drew the shooters attention away from unarmed civilians, likely causing less casualties. An early shot bring down the shooter (even without killing him), would have stopped much of the carnage.
In combat, it is better to be armed than unarmed. Collateral casualties are always possible also.
Ask yourself this... Would you feel safer if uniformed officers responded or not? You would feel safer and have less carnage with more police I am sure. Think of armed civilians as plain clohes cops without all their training.
But all new laws are going to do is take away from the law abiders. You said yourself, crazy / law breakers could care less what the laws are. To take away the right to bare arms from society is to leave the criminals armed and the citizens defenseless.
I still believe having someone armed and returning (drawing, supressing) his fire, would have lessened casualties. I was taught that if you suspect body armor aim for the legs arms or head. I was also taught aimed fire is way more effective than sparying rounds. Having been in combart decades ago, I think I would have reacted calmly, the instinct being to get to ground.
However without any opposition, you get maxiumum carnage. Thank god the guy was not the smartest around for weapons selection. Had he been trained or experienced the carnage would be far greater. The 100 round clip jambing probably saved a dozen lives...
I really hope this forum will not be discussing gun issues all day today....I would have thought that most would have had a fill over the weekend......
How about " The Open"? The "Big Easy" was a surprise and refreshing, Ernie Els has had a dry spell for a little while....And poor Scott just got into too much trouble.
Interesting finish.
I really am curious, regardless of your political persuasion, if you agree with this or not.
THUMBS UP - you agree that this is what you think you would have done if you were in that theater.
THUMBS DOWN - If you would have been in that theater and had a gun, you would have tried to use it.
How do we not find a guy that is willing to plot and scheme and follow through with something this heinous as LEGALLY INSANE? I see no other way something ike this happens. No sane person does this.
So do we now protect this guy, knowing he's sick?
I do agree with the return fire if possible ??
If I had been carrying a weapon?....Which would have been slim to none.
I would have went bunker mentality....Made myself small and tried to get off precise shots, after I had rapid fired 3-4 rounds.
I don't think the kid was a shooter...He was just spraying and shooting at the crowd.
For mass hysterical reaction and to see how many he could hit or hurt.
A mental case that would take years to figure out,
I would hope he is Federally charged an executed within a year. or less...
I'm done with this.
I agree with all that MG said, but to get their you have to assume a "good guy" was willing to break the law to have the gun there in the first place. So now I guess the debate (if it even needs to continue) should be about if that's right to not allow the guns in or not?
What I asked for initially, that got this whole convo started on Friday, apparently has already been deemed illegal. Concealed carry or not, no law abiding citizen was allowed to have a gun in that theater, or any other in the country. PERIOD.
So this wacko, and any other wacko for that matter, knows he has a "sitting duck" group of victims just waiting for him. Scary when you think about it.
Thanks for the early tips Charley...Yeah, It doesn't look like it will be a good day.....
Swaggs.....Don't know why you have the tag-line...."regardless of your political persuasion." ??
Gun owning, shooting,hunting are an ideology; Not really Political..
I consider the question a Rock and a Hard Place..
First of all, We would be in a crowded theater, not knowing the lighting conditions?
I don't care for mucho,Machos, irregardless if Cop or a trained shooter, they get crazy sometimes.
We did not know at first, but found out later that he was prepared for combat...And he had several guns and all protective gear...A GAME CHANGER.
It would take a Glok or a big 40+ cal mag, hollow or armour pierce to take him down or knock him on his azz..
I have been trained,use to be a shooter and still do some hunting...
If I had been there with wife, I "probably would have panicked"..Got her down and hid, me on top.
We do not have any large caliber pistols at this time, but I have a 44 mag long rifle and some 12 ga.
semi autos, I know I could have knocked him down, kill maybe not?? I would have tried.
You don't carry them into theaters..
I do agree with MG and bullets being thrown at him would probably have changed things.
RELATED ARTICLES
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
RECENT QUOTES
WATCHLIST
MARKET UPDATE
| NAME | LAST | CHANGE | % CHANGE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later. | ||||
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 ended this week with a bang, roaring to a new all-time high on the back of stronger-than-expected economic data, influential leadership, and an ongoing appreciation for the Fed's monetary policy support.
The bullish bias was evident in premarket action as the S&P futures pointed to a higher start without the benefit of any definitive news catalyst. Stocks indeed benefited from a blast of buying interest at the opening bell on this ... More
More Market News
Currencies
| NAME | LAST | CHANGE | % CHANGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later. | |||
LATEST MARKET DISPATCHES
- No more Dispatches; here's where to find market news
The Market Dispatches column has been discontinued. Here's where to find the latest stock and business news on MSN Money, and the latest from market writer Charley Blaine.
- Dow falls 59 as late-day gloom kills a rally
- Stocks held back by fiscal-cliff worries
- Stocks suffer worst weekly loss in 5 months
- Dow off 121 as post-election swoon continues
- Dow slumps 313 after Obama's re-election
- Dow jumps 133 as Americans head to the polls
TOP STOCKS
All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.


