7/7/2014 6:15 PM ET|
5 fees that are killing your retirement
These excessive charges are a drain on your investments, but they can be avoided with some advance planning.
Imagine top scientists engaged in a serious discussion about whether the earth is round or the moon is made of cheese.
Silly, right? Now imagine investing professionals engaged in a serious discussion about whether investment advisory fees of 1.5 percent plus $750 a year on a $450,000 portfolio are too high. That's exactly what I encountered in the Q&A section of BrightScope.com, a 401k ratings firm.
Some quick math tells us that the investor paying these fees is shelling out $7,500 a year. These costs don't account for the underlying cost of the investments. Over a 10-year period, and assuming an 8 percent return would have been earned had these fees stayed in the account, this investor will lose nearly $110,000, or almost 25 percent of the starting balance in the portfolio.
Over 20 years the loss triples to more than $340,000. Over a 40-year period the loss is seven figures. And these figures assume a constant fee of $7,500 a year, not an increasing fee that would come with a larger portfolio.
It's time to get real. High investment costs will wreck a portfolio. Here are five costs that are the most pernicious:
1. Advisory fees
Paying an investment advisor 1 percent or more annually almost guarantees below-market performance. Even the most talented advisors, over the long run, are unable to beat the markets by the cost of their services.
For those looking for investment help, there are several lower cost alternatives. First, a low-cost mutual fund company like Vanguard offers investors advice on constructing a diversified portfolio. Second, there are low cost and easy-to-use online tools available that make investing a snap.
For those considering a traditional fee-only advisor, forget paying 1 percent. While that may be the standard cost, there are plenty of advisors that charge 0.5 percent or less.
2. Management fees
Mutual fund fees also eat away at a retirement portfolio. Low-cost index funds typically carry an expense ratio of 10 to 25 basis points. Actively managed funds can easily cost 100 basis points or more. Studies have shown that actively managed funds rarely beat the market over the long run. It's also impossible to predict which funds, if any, will beat the market in the future.
3. Transaction costs
The expense ratio does not include a mutual fund's cost to buy and sell shares. For actively managed funds, these transaction costs can be significant. John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, estimates that transaction costs add an additional 50 basis points in costs to actively managed funds.
While fee-only advisors do not earn commissions on the investment products they sell, commissioned brokers do. These fees typically amount to more than 5 percent of the amount invested. Commissions are in addition to the management fees charged by the mutual funds.
5. Unnecessary taxes
Actively managed funds often generate significant tax liability. While these taxes are of no concern in a tax-advantaged retirement account, they can represent a significant drag on performance in a taxable account. In contrast, index funds typically do far less buying and selling. The result is less taxable income and lower transaction costs.
More from U.S. News & World Report
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Obama wants to waste 3.7 Billion on Illegals.
BUILD A WALL FOR 3.7 BILLION!!!
No child or pregnant woman can climb a 30 foot wall!!
The best thing you can do for yourself is read a book on low-fee index fund investing and start up an account on your own. Vanguard will let you trade their funds for free. Your idiot nephew that just signed up for Primerica has no clue what they're doing and they will cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars over the long term.
PS. No I won't be looking for government handouts, just the money Soc Sec stole out of my paycheck.
OK, now, lets get away from politics and talk about what fee-based financial planners can offer. Certainly, there are plenty of leeches out there offering to help you to invest, and many of them are not giving anything of value. You may be able to beat their returns on your own, you may not, and indexing or Vanguard low-fee funds are not always "better".
Look for an advisor that offers you something that you cannot do yourself. I have a portion of my portfolio in high yield tax exempt bonds, not readily available for individual buyers on the primary market. Non-profit entities borrow to build schools, housing for seniors, and other real projects producing real value and real cash flows. No Puerto Rico bonds or "junk"... and look for a GIPS certified performance net of fees.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market began the new trading week on the defensive note with small-cap stocks pacing the retreat. The Russell 2000 (-1.4%) and Nasdaq Composite (-1.1%) displayed relative weakness, while the S&P 500 lost 0.8% with all ten sectors ending in the red.
Global equities began showing some cracks overnight after China's Finance Minister Lou Jiwei poured cold water on hopes for new stimulus measures. Specifically, Mr. Lou said the government has no plans to change ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'