5 ways to fix the 401k

The 401k has become the primary retirement-savings vehicle for many workers, but critics say it isn't up to the task. Here are five suggestions to improve it.

 of 7
 of 7


Jun 9, 2014 12:35PM
OMG YES-YES-YES - Let's SOOO put the Federal Government in charge of yet MORE of our monies - because they have shown over time how WONDERFULLY they can manage our monies!  Think SOCIAL SECURITY, IRS, WELFARE, MEDICAID, OBAMACARE, TAX MONIES IN GENERAL, CELL PHONE PLAN !!!!  Our government  does NOT have our best interests in mind - EVER!  If they did, then they would have MANAGED our Social Security monies so there would have been enough monies in the system to NOT be bankrupt in the next 20 years.  With 77-MILLION baby boomers in the workforce (more than EVER before) they CERTAINLY were receiving more than enough monies to fund both the current retirees AND the upcoming retirees. It's NOT like this was sprung on them - they knew for 65 YEARS (yes, since we were born) that the Baby Boomers would someday retire and in their infinite wisdom(?) chose to BANKRUPT the SS fund to spend it on their "pet projects".  EVERY CONGRESSPERSON WHO SERVED DURING THIS TIMEFRAME & VOTED TO TAKE FUNDS FROM THIS ACCOUNT should be TRIED for embezzlement, ALL assets confiscated, and they should be imprisoned!  This is what would happen to any employer who mismanaged or confiscated a pension plan - so they should get no less!  REINSTATE DEFINIED BENEFITS PLANS TO EVERYONE.  for small employers, you can band together as a group and develop pension plans for your employees as well, at minimal cost to all. The ONLY thing the federal government can manage is GIVING THEMSELVES OUR MONEY!  THEY vote for THEIR raises - wouldn't you guys like to have that option?!?!?   THE GOVERNMENT ALREADY HAS THEIR NOSES IN ALL OUR BUSINESS - THIS HAS TO STOP!!!
Jun 9, 2014 11:38AM
"Originally designed to supplement pension plans, 401ks have become the primary retirement-savings vehicle for many employees"

Totally BS, it was designed to allow Corporations to get away from providing great Pension Plans. So as the elite reward themselves with Record Wealth, they are ripping off the Workers in the process. The Race to the Bottom continues. However if your Employer matches dollar for dollar, take it the the Max.
Jun 9, 2014 6:59AM

Worked for many years in a small group practice with a very practical outlook on our 401K.

1) High earners can only maximize contributions by maximizing participation by lower earners.

2) Lowers earners will only participate if they understand the process.  Our answers?

Generous match. Company pays administrative fees, not participant. Low cost panel of mutual funds (we used Vanguard for decades). And lots of education and encouragement.

Didn't always work, of course, but you can't help if you don't try...

Jun 9, 2014 11:26AM
Please no national plan. Who will run the plan, and if the government is involved better believe the fees will be high. Also no way the Social (Lack of) Security could be entrusted with that money. Have we not learned that national plans will fail.

Jun 9, 2014 11:26AM

Do we really want the goverment managing more retirement money? What is to stop them from steering funds to T-Bills when they need a loan?

People need to be held accountable for themselves and only then will we see an improvment in retirement savings.

Jun 9, 2014 12:57AM
401k better than nothing  if  the company has match , 
Jun 9, 2014 1:30PM

The military still provides a pension after just 20 years of service. If you want a pension then enlist in the military and serve 20 years.

Jun 9, 2014 12:38PM
WHERE is the money that your employer was contributing into your "defined benefit" pension plan?  I certainly didn't receive this to input into my 401K - did anyone else?  This is now going DIRECTLY INTO THE POCKETS OF THE EXECUTIVES!  THIS IS WRONG!!!
Jun 23, 2014 2:24PM
They need to change the rules on Vesting Schedules.  A company should only be allow to take back their original contribution, not the contribution plus investment growth and interest. 
Jul 6, 2014 9:08AM

I'm not a fan of automatic enrollment nor automatic contribution escalation.  It's my money so it should be my choice - not forced upon me.  I'm not saying that 401(k) programs are bad - I'm saying that I want to make my own investment choices. 


My employer sent me an e-mail with much fanfare about how they were automatically enrolling me into a 401(k) plan that they'd picked.  Other than the name of the provider, there were only vague details about what made up the portfolio.  I checked the provider's web site and couldn't find our plan name listed.  When I called and asked (after a long hold) I was given a run-around and an attitude of "trust us".  Sorry but I don't invest blindly and I don't trust salesmen.


I was assured that I could opt out easily, and they did provide instructions.  But I found that those instructions did not work - the website menu selections did not exist.  I called again and they admitted that I actually had to opt out with them over the phone, followed by a notarized letter!  They purposely make it hard for us to get their hands out of our pockets.


Since then I got the cold shoulder with every interaction with my employer.  They said I'm not a team player (since I wouldn't be one of their sheep).  But they were just a contracting agency so I changed agencies.  I wonder how much kickback they were getting?

Jun 9, 2014 3:34PM
The biggist risk to your retirement is obama and congress. They all figure if you have one your rich and they are going to tax you. If government wants people to have a retirement which is doubtful they will stop taxing them. SS is still not stable and never will be. But why should all the Politicoes care they have their nice warm fuzzy golden fleece.
Jul 6, 2014 8:55AM
I do not mind paying someone to invest my money; That's a service that should be paid for. What I object to is some greedy Democrat taxing the hell out of it so he can give it to his lazy **** constituents, whom mostly are on some form of assistance, for their vote, .  
Jun 23, 2014 6:42AM
#6 Do not allow them to take fees no matter what. This is supposed to be peoples retirement so they should only be allowed to collect fees when the make the clients money.  No one is perfect and I know markets are  unpredictable, but nothing hurts more than to see that the markets tanked and you look at statement only to see your fund lost you money out of your 401k for that month or quarter and yet they still have there fees on that statement drawing your fund down even further.  They have no incentive to care, because no matter what they will make money, which at times, lets them take risks that they probably should not.
Jul 6, 2014 11:14AM
The federal government wants to nationalize OUR 401k's and IRA's (THEIR money will be exempt from this plan, of course) so WE can "share the responsibility" of providing for even more welfare rats.
Jun 23, 2014 8:04AM
So a section ( 401k ) of the Internal Revenue Code sits on the books for 2 years (1978-1980 ) before a Pa dairy farmer's son, Ted Benna, discovers that it can be developed into a retirement product. That sounds like a well thought out retirement plan for Americans. ( Nothing against Ted, He's a really smart guy.) 
Jul 6, 2014 11:56AM
Remember when Slick Willie was president?  And it was the talk of the tele, that pension funds were under funded. Many corporations were less than 50% funded. Including the corporation  I worked for.  Well once Slick got the law passed to force corporations to fund their pensions to 100%, many started to drop defined benefits. Including mine. We lost ours 5 years ago. Blances were frozen. We  got an enhanced 401k instead, ours is 6.5% of base wages. Whoopee dooo.  I was barely 50 when it went into effect, as were the majority of employees. We took huge hits.  The older workers, 55 and older didn't take the hit and will retire with about 3/4's of their pensions. The 50 year old crowd will have less than half, the youngsters 40 or less, some had 20 years, won't get enough in the pensions to pay a cable tv bill.  So that left us to stuff as much in our 401k's as possible. Only problem, not enough years to build it up by 62.  Bottom line, the Guberment got involved and we lost, thanks Slick!
Jul 6, 2014 8:39AM
More lies that "We the People" have been duped into believing... just wait and see what happens to your 401K when the bottom falls out of this artificially sustained market!
Jul 6, 2014 8:33AM
did you hear about the flasher who was thinking of retiring early?
         he decided to stick it out for one more year.
Jul 6, 2014 2:21PM
What an idiot this Anna Prior is. Nationalize a 401k and kiss is goodbye.  Just another example of the media wanting to socialize our country.
Jul 6, 2014 1:56PM

The reason S.S is broke is because L.B.J. stole the money to finance his Viet Nam war .

Then his great society program that pays to people that has never paid a penny into it.

Now we have Obuma that wants to be the dictator and take control of everything.

Just wait... if he gets his way you will have your S.S. taken away from you if you have a 401k or any other retirement plan.

And yes, when a ceo. can scalp us for millions a year we have a problem.

If you want the best be a politician. You can serve 4 years and retire with full pay and benefits.

Then try to tell the voters how hard you are working for them.

This nation is very corrupt.

Impeach Obuma !!!!

Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes

[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: +1.00. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: -0.30. The stock market is on track for a subdued start as futures on the S&P 500 trade within a point of fair value. The S&P 500 futures have maintained a four-point range throughout the night and have largely ignored a modest rally that is taking place in Europe at this time. The divergence should not be too surprising considering U.S. participants are showing some caution ahead of the latest FOMC ... More


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.



Quotes delayed at least 15 min