8/5/2014 5:15 PM ET|
Buy-and-hold investing isn't dead, it's just impossible
Whatever your investment strategy may be, emotional discipline is what matters most -- and in times of crisis, that can be hard to come by.
For years, there have been two principle adjectives used to describe the buy-and-hold investment style: Dead or alive.
The buy-and-hold style was, of course, labeled as dead during and after the financial crisis of 2008, when anyone who stayed with their investments saw their portfolios get cut in half.
The same style is purportedly now alive and well, as anyone who stuck it out after their losses -- or jumped into the market after the turmoil -- has seen a years-long rally that has recouped the losses and reached record highs.
Truthfully, the problem may be less with the style and more with the adjectives, because at least one leading money manager and behavioral finance expert now suggests that buy-and-hold is unrealistic and impossible.
This week, Natixis Global Asset Management committed $1 million to a three-year research project by the Laboratory for Financial Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to help figure out how investors can bridge the emotional gap between a desire to generate superior investment returns and an aversion to taking risk.
In discussing the project, Andrew W. Lo, director of the Laboratory for Financial Engineering -- and manager of the ASG Diversifying Strategies Fund (DSFAX), a Natixis issue -- noted that the research is designed to tackle the really tough part of investing, the one where you put your hand back in the fire after you've been burned.
Standard advice typically amounts to "the market will be up in the long run," encouraging buy-and-hold for decades.
"That might sound like good advice because on paper when you take a look at the S&P 500 ($INX) over the last 10, 20 or 30 years the performance looks pretty good the longer you go," Lo said during an appearance on "MoneyLife with Chuck Jaffe." "The problem is that advice is just not realistic. You can't expect an investor to live through 2008-2009 and be perfectly happy to see their investments decline by 50 percent.
"You literally would have lost half . . . nobody is going to be rational to the point of not taking that information and reacting to it," he added. "We are all emotional in that context."
As a dedicated long-term investor, I can argue that point empirically by looking at my own portfolio, which went through the financial crisis virtually unchanged, with just a few small moves on the fringes but with the primary investments remaining the same.
I can also think back to those rough market times, however, and remember the nausea as the core of my portfolio was being gutted.
That emotion, in hindsight, is precisely why pure buy-and-hold can be, for most people, unrealistic.
Whether it is making moves on the edge of a portfolio or hiring a money manager who adapts and tries to guide the portfolio, it's basic human nature to want to avoid pain.
Lo compared it to a different human imperative.
"It's not credible to say to an investor, 'Here's a stock index fund, you ought to just keep your money in it and don't worry about it and leave it there for 10 or 20 years,'" he said. "That's like telling a teenager he or she ought to abstain; it might be reasonable advice in the long run, but in the short run it's very difficult to follow."
- Also on MarketWatch: Autopilot investing isn't all it's cracked up to be
No matter what strategy investors opt to follow -- whether it is buy-and-hold or some rapid-trading, momentum-driven methodology -- the necessary personal ingredient for success is emotional discipline, the ability to stick it out.
C. Thomas Howard, director of research at AthenaInvest and author of "Behavioral Portfolio Management," told me recently that the biggest problem investors face comes in accepting an investment strategy and following it as it is; they pick a strategy that they understand and like, follow it easily during good times, but then have a tough time the moment they question a trade, a stock pick or the results in the market.
"You can't invest like a great investor if you're not investing just like that investor," Howard said. "You start to think you know better, or that there's just this one thing they are doing that you don't like, and suddenly you are changing. Now you are not following a successful system, you are modifying one; that may work out for you, or it may not."
Howard noted that by cherry-picking the parts of a methodology they like -- but ignoring or changing moves they're less comfortable with -- investors typically give themselves the wrong scapegoat for when something goes wrong. Invariably, they blame the adviser, newsletter editor, investment service or guru for failing when it was their own moves that altered the strategy.
"There's lots of ways to make money in the stock market, to be successful," Howard said. "The key is that you have got to master your emotions, follow a narrowly defined strategy, and consistently take only high-conviction positions over time."
Bring that back to the buy-and-hold strategy and recognize that the market is going to test your conviction. Ultimately, that's what leads Lo to say that buy-and-hold forever can't be done, even if most behavioral-finance guys say that it's the strategy investors might benefit the most from.
That said, investors need to do some self-examination and perhaps give their portfolio several different approaches, one where the core of their holdings is something as simple as buy-and-hold, but where there is enough money being invested in other ways that it creates enough conviction to stay invested in good times and bad.
In the end, it may not be that buy-and-hold is dead, impossible or unrealistic so much as it's that one piece of a puzzle for those investors who stomach it as one strategy in a multi-pronged attempt to come up with a portfolio they can live with in all market conditions; if you can't live with buy-and-hold when it feels more like a fruitless duck-and-cover play -- if you don't think you can witness the carnage of 2008 all over again and remain invested -- then you need to prepare for the days when the market again punishes buy-and-holders.
Knowing that now means you can protect against a downturn; finding out too late guarantees that your story will include the worst outcomes at the worst times.
More from MarketWatch
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
What is this fool advocating? Follow the lemmings over the cliff?
I grow very tired of 'articles' on this website just trying to stir up a fight by being stupidly contrarian.
And I do mean stupid
So what you're saying is most people buy high and sell low because they don't have the stomach for it when things get bad. Maybe they should never have been in the market in the first place. But for you to say that 'it's impossible for them to tough it out' is the biggest piece of disreputable 'reporting' I've ever seen.
All this article is, is about a bunch of spurious research and opinions. To drum up mouse clicks.
As a self-reported 'long term' investor, this 'author' should be ashamed of himself.
The Markets setting Record Highs has literally been a Gift. We all have benefited. However there will be future costs/pain. The past costs has been to punish Savers along with the Trust Fund for Medicare and Social Security. That's right folks, that fund's balance is paid interest which has been far lower due to some interest rates manipulated basically down to zero. Therefore it will run out far quicker then it should. That will effect far more folks then relying on a Stock Market Juiced up on Global Crack Dollars.
We are always told that actions have consequences. Funny how some folks will disregard those consequences as long as the Markets keep rising. Once it doesn't, the Reality of Robbing Peter to Pay Paul rears it's ugly head. We have literally robbed our future to bail out the top 1%. This shortsighted view of trickle down economics will eventually wipe out all the current gains and then some.
Those that didn't lock in profits because unmitigated Greed, they will get exactly what they deserve. It's not about just getting the best possible price, it's also about preservation of Capital. That is something far too many folks have forgotten about. Soon or later, they will get a Stark reminder. The Mother of all Bull Markets will be followed by the Father of all Bear Markets. Why, unsustainable Global debt and leverage. Buy and hold to infinity is dead, it died the day the Global Feds went insane.
From the article, quoting 'Lo':
"You literally would have lost half . . . nobody is going to be rational to the point of not taking that information and reacting to it," he added. "We are all emotional in that context"
'Nobody'?? I rode it out, and my portfolio that was down 50% is now up 200%. Fell from $280K to $160K, now is $420K.
What is the point of this article? First half tells us no one can endure a downturn, and then right at the end, he sort of says maybe you should.
well, not following buy & hold only works if you really know when the crash and recovery occurs.
people pulled back when Obama was elected thinking a crash would result from that. it didn't. years later their "timing" shows it's own flaw.
for me i'm in the usual company 401K and diversify across several mutual funds. my timeline to retire is still distant enough to let it roll for a while. even then, once retired, I certainly hope to be around to spend it for still another 25 years. ~ so the timeline THEN is still long before I need to cash out.
so I don't fret the small stuff
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages posted solid gains ahead of tomorrow's policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 rallied 0.8%, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) could not keep pace with the benchmark index.
Equity indices hovered near their flat lines during the first two hours of action, but surged in reaction to reports from the Wall Street Journal concerning tomorrow's FOMC statement. Specifically, Fed watcher Jon Hilsenrath indicated that the statement ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'