5/17/2011 11:42 AM ET|
No rush to sell commodities
Mutual fund investors are getting an uncomfortable reminder of how volatile commodity prices can be. But the fundamentals remain in place for long-term gains.
Mutual fund investors who decided a year or more ago to take a chance on commodity funds have now found out what all the warnings and danger signs were about.
The question is how they intend to deal with it.
Prices for commodities have risen dramatically over the past year, with a wide range of factors behind the trend. Many investors used commodities to hedge against a weakening U.S. dollar and the threat of inflation. Others liked the story of growing worldwide demand, especially from emerging markets. And there was the turmoil in the Middle East and its potential to change the supply picture for oil.
No matter the reason, commodity investors were rewarded. The average broad-basket commodity fund returned around 40% more than the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) over the past 12 months, according to Morningstar. No one was complaining with annualized average returns well north of the 20% line.
But no one ever complains when the volatility is to the upside. If the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) gains 1,000 points tomorrow, investors will be partying; if the market drops 1,000 points -- same move, different direction -- bolt the windows shut.
And over the past several weeks, commodities have shown that their volatility is not just to the upside.
Silver, among the biggest gainers in the commodity uprising, fell 27% in the first week of May alone, after hitting a 31-year high. Oil prices dropped 15% in the same week.
Over the last month, commodity-sector mutual funds suffered double-digit declines and have since bounced back. But few investors signed up thinking their funds would drop 7% in a month, about the average for commodity funds, as calculated by Lipper.
Buy high, sell low
This is the time in investment cycles when fund investors typically make their biggest mistakes. Unlike the sharpies who came in early on market moves, most buyers were late to decide that they needed more exposure to commodities than they might get through their ordinary funds. In fact, many were content until they saw the oversized gains commodities were putting up.
At that point, they decided it was time to make an allocation decision. They weren't buying commodities to get the hot asset class, because retail investors don't see themselves as timing or chasing the market. They just felt that the story was so good and the diversification benefits so strong that they needed to commit a piece of their portfolio to it.
Now, however, they're reacting to the volatility and price drop. Measures of fund flows show money racing out of commodity funds, which means that some investors who bought at a high price are selling low.
"If you are allocating the appropriate amount towards commodities -- no more than 10% to 15% of the total portfolio should be in commodities, because they are so volatile -- then you should just leave it in place and don't try to time things," said Holly Hooper-Fournier, the editor of the Mutual Fund Strategist newsletter, which uses mutual funds to implement timing strategies.
"That's hard for the commodities investors who were late to the game," she added. "They did not have the benefit of the run-up of the last 12 months. They bought in recently because of the story, and now they're getting a timing sell signal, or they're just feeling the volatility because it's against them and they want to blow up their strategy."
But the fundamentals haven't changed, said Walter Frank, the chief investment officer for Moneyletter.
'There is no free lunch'
"You are buying commodities on the premise that global growth ultimately will show up in demand for commodities, meaning that you will do reasonably well in the long run," Frank said. "The people who do spectacularly well playing commodities, well, let's just say that's not the average guy buying a commodities mutual fund. So if you've got a commodities fund, you play the fundamentals and try to ignore the ups and downs, no matter how spectacular those moves can be."
Ignoring the downs is never easy, as investors in commodity funds are finding out. In fact, those swings are readily visible in the performance charts, where Lipper shows the average commodity fund with an annualized gain of 16.4% over the past 24 months but an annualized loss of 12.25% over the past three years. Over the past 10 full calendar years, the average commodity fund was up in seven of them, but the two biggest moves (both well over 30%) were to the downside.
"Ask yourself why you got into commodities in the first place," said Jeff Tjornehoj, senior research analyst for Lipper. "If you bought in because you felt your portfolio was not capturing the full market of securities, then you should have known that there is no free lunch and that the run would not go on forever. Backing away now would just reopen that hole in your portfolio. And if you have commodities in their proper place -- so that they are a smaller portion of your overall holdings -- there's just no reason to panic."
This article was reported by Chuck Jaffe for MarketWatch.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Dealing in commodities is fascinating be it Gold or Silver Wheat or Corn it is just lke the raindrops it goes up and it comes down. As the vapors of water evaporate and go sky high they accumulate and then come falling down like the tiny raindrops falling on your head.
AGain, I disagree. The fact you are seeing so much volatility is evidence of the current prices being unsustainable.
As the OP states, committities are a headge against the USD, and the US economy. Working on the assumption that the economy is recovering, then one can expect a general downward trend on prices.
Farther, the fact both gold and silver in particular are currently sitting at or near their inflation adjusted all time highs should be sending warning sirens to everyone. After all, in 1982, everyone said that gold was a great buy, prior to it collapsing some 80% in just over a week...
Buy low and sell high. Prices are already high, so it doesn't make sense to get into an asset one can reasonably expect to be lower within the next 5 years [and I'm being VERY optimistic on how long prices can hold in my opinion]. I'll wait for the correction and get in cheap, thanks.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|