George Zimmer vs. Men's Wearhouse over firing
The clothing chain's founder and well-known TV pitchman cites 'concerns' with the board over strategy. There must be more to it.
Though the men's clothier was mum on the specifics behind the ouster of Zimmer, who had been the company's executive chairman, he told CNBC that he has had concerns for months about the strategy the board has undertaken. Zimmer wasn't more specific.
"Instead of fostering the kind of dialogue in the boardroom that has in part contributed to our success, the board has inappropriately chosen to silence my concerns through termination as an executive officer," CNBC quotes Zimmer as saying.
Earlier, Men's Wearhouse had said "the board expects to discuss with Mr. Zimmer the extent, if any, and terms of his ongoing relationship with the company." Again, no specifics were given.
That raises the question of why Men's Wearhouse would want to maintain a relationship with someone whom it had terminated so suddenly. One analyst CNBC quoted said Zimmer had difficulty letting go of the reins of power.
As the chain's co-founder in 1973, Zimmer remains a large stockholder, owning 1.77 million shares, according to the company's latest proxy. That raises the possibility that he'll try to mount some sort of challenge. Until today, Zimmer had a pretty sweet deal. In 2012, his compensation, which included perks such as the personal use of corporate aircraft, totaled $1.09 million.
Men's Wearhouse had the right to use Zimmer's likeness, which he had trademarked, while he was employed by the company in exchange for a $10,000 annual fee. The payoff doesn't end there for Zimmer, who's known for the catchphrase "You are going to like the way you look -- I guarantee it."
"If Mr. Zimmer ceases to be an employee of the Company for any reason, then we would be required to pay Mr. Zimmer or his estate $250,000 per year for four years for the continued license," the proxy says.
During the most recent quarter, Men's Wearhouse reported better-than-expected results. Even with Wednesday's sell-off, the shares are up about 18% this year.
But as Zimmer has discovered, founding a company doesn't come with the ironclad job security that some people might think, especially when it's publicly traded.
Groupon (GRPN) ousted CEO Andrew Mason earlier this year after investors decided he lacked the skills needed to run the company he'd founded. Best Buy (BBY) founder Richard Schulze was forced out of the electronics retailer last year for failing to tell his fellow board members about CEO Brian Dunn's affair with an employee. Dunn was fired, but Schulze rejoined the retailer this year as chairman emeritus.
Men's Wearhouse hasn't forgotten Zimmer quite yet. His picture is still prominently shown on the company's website, which makes the story of his ouster even stranger.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
And let us not forget that Steve Jobs was once let go from his job at an outfit that he co-founded. It happens.
I've spoken with a Dallas area dude who knew George Z back in the 1980s. (I think the chain started with a store in Dallas?) He said he remembered the guy as"decent and impressive."
But inquiring minds want to know: What was the Board strategy that so upset Mr. Zimmer? Perhaps it wasn't so much strategy as strategery?
Hasta la vista, baby.
Guess I will do my shopping somewhere else if George is out.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Sales of collectible automobiles hit an all-time record this year, leading some to speculate that soaring prices could lead to a huge deal.
- Bah, humbug! New Christmas tree tax proposed
- Should you get a store credit card?
- The best credit cards of 2013
- Can a new chief exec keep GM on course?
- 'Tips for Jesus' big spender unmasked?
- Chinese investors are buying up Detroit
- Mega Millions jackpot hits $344 million
- 5 reasons to think twice about a balance transfer card
- Will I have to pay taxes because of a foreclosed home?
[BRIEFING.COM] Equity indices settled on their lows following a steady, session-long slide. Similar to yesterday, small-caps paced the retreat as the Russell 2000 fell 1.6%, extending its December loss to 3.6%. The S&P 500 settled lower by 1.1%, widening its month-to-date decline to 1.3%.
There was no specific news catalyst behind today's slide, which had the markings of broad-based profit-taking. Seven of ten sectors settled with losses of 1.0% or more while only two groups ... More
More Market News
The offering could become the second-biggest this year if underwriters exercise an option to buy more shares.