Is the tech sector hostile to women?
A series of events straight from the fraternity house makes things worse in a field already rife with sexism.
The website Business Insider came under fire this week for the outrageous Twitter comments of Pax Dickinson, its now former chief technology officer.
Dickinson (pictured) had been dropping some jaw-droppingly offensive bits on Twitter for some time now, but people started getting fired up when he said this on Monday: "feminism in tech remains the champion topic for my block list. my finger is getting tired."
It didn't take much probing to find several other examples of things a technology executive should really never say. "A man who argues on behalf of feminism is a tragic figure of irony, like a Jewish Nazi," he mused last year.
Another message said basketball star LeBron James has more dedication, ambition and drive because he raped an entire city. Kobe Bryant "only raped one girl."
People are prone to dumb comments on Twitter, but Dickinson was in a position of power and hired software developers. So people noticed when he said things like "Tech managers spend as much time worrying about how to hire talented female developers as they do worrying about how to hire a unicorn."
At first, Business Insider's Henry Blodget tried to sweep the issue away, telling Valleywag that Dickinson "was speaking for himself, not Business Insider." But the criticism continued, and within a day Dickinson was gone.
Can it get worse? Oh yes. Let's cruise on over to last weekend's TechCrunch conference. In the first presentation of the day, two programmers unveiled an app that will take pictures of you while you're looking at women's breasts. The programmers did admit that "women just aren't that warm to it," Salon reports, and probably could have asked any woman cringing in the audience for confirmation.
That was followed by a presentation about "Circle Shake," which included a man pretending to masturbate. Yes, children were in the audience, and no, that didn't seem to impact anyone's judgment.
TechCrunch, which is owned by AOL (AOL), later apologized. "Sexism is a major problem in the tech industry, and we've worked hard to counteract it in our coverage and in our own hiring," co-editors Alexia Tsotsis and Eric Eldon said in a note on the site.
TechCrunch linked to an article in MIT Technology Review noting how gender bias helps push an estimated 3,000 women with doctorate degrees out of the scientific workforce every year. That article was from 2008, but clearly things haven't improved much.
This is an industry dominated by "brogrammers," one that pays women 49 cents to every man's dollar. That alone sets women back to begin with, and people like Pax Dickinson are just there to make sure they don't progress any farther.
- Goldman Sachs ditches a great employee perk
- When airlines use paint as damage control
- Are some Walgreens stores gouging customers?
Sexism is clearly wrong, and those who engage in it should be fired. It is also wrong to drive down wages by flooding the US market with low-wage foreign nationals, but those who do that are called innovators and get bonuses while those who need to compete for crumbs see our standards of living decimated and destroyed.
Why is anyone surprised that sexism is alive and well? A black boy gets shot by an hispanic man and everyone cries racism and the entire country is in an uproar so much so that the president feels the need to make a speech. A 14 year old girl gets raped and subsequently commits suicide because the male sexist pig judge thought since it wasn't a beat up kind of rape it wasn't that bad so only gave the offender 30 days in jail. Exactly what about that shouts equality?? Exactly what about 3 male youths who shoot an Aussie aren't fully developed until they are 24 years old so we can judge them less harshly but a 14 year old girl is fully in control over herself when faced with a teacher who wants to have sex with her, shouts equality to anyone???
You could never show a black man crawling on all fours with a chain around his neck but you can a woman. It's called pornography and it's nicely tucked away protected by the system made by men for men.
Men wont change until women change and get angry all over again.
I have come to believe that putting women down is a masculine ritual that (some) men routinely perform for the benefit of other men, that is, look at me, I am a macho jerk, therefore I am a real man, and not a pussy. This is like the feminine ritual of screaming and have a panic attack and pretending to be helpless when a small tiny insect appears: it's like saying, I'm a cute widdle helpless girlie-pie, and therefore, a real woman, not a butch... in reality, normal people don't need to act like jerks or be afraid of little bugs. It's all just phony, trying to project an image. Sad, isn't it?
Not hiring because of Race, Religion & Gender ... etc, is totally wrong. But you shouldn't hire to make a quota either. Hire the best for your company and let the market and the individual parties determine the salaries. If anyone doesn't like their salaries or situation and you believe you are that good .... its an open market ... see what you're worth.
If a company hires based on quotas, or doesn't hire the best because of Race, Religion & Gender ... etc, there will be consequences. I believe in the one case it does a disservice to the group and makes me question a groups ability within an organization (did they hire the best or because of classification?) and in the other case the business will lose to competition that does hire the best regardless of a classified group.
It's a tragically competitive world. Businesses survive because they have the right mix of people.
First: I will state I am male:
Second: 'Technology' is a VERY broad term Way too large for generalizations:
I've been in Information Technology, as a manager, for 20 plus years and I know first hand how the money is spent: Information Technology is an industry where salary parity does exist between men and women.
The statement in the article "This is an industry dominated by "brogrammers," one that for every man's dollar pays women 49 cents" is so far off base it's pathetic
Don't forget that women are the reason you men are able to carry your "legacy" through generations to come, and we're more than just caregivers. We have more to offer than just your babies (which is obviously not enough in itself) so it's time for you to wake up from the 1950s and realize that women also think for themselves, have brains, and are able to use them quite well in all different fields of study. Your minds are narrow.
Before we cry sexism, can we dig deeper into the data? I would like to present statistics of how many women are Computer Science majors compared to men, and the percentage of women compared to men that apply for IT jobs. I know this makes for a good story but as a journalist I would like to see the writer actually present data to back up the claim. If I gave you the statistics that only 9.4% of nurses are men, I can present the headline “Are Women Keeping Men Out of the Inner Circle of Nurses” and looking at the number comparison I could say YES, but if I looked at the amount of male graduates compared to women I could probably conclude that the numbers are just not there for an equal opportunity.
I know this maynot be a popular comment, but let me say this. I have been in the Technical
Field for 20 years. I have seen numerous Women Technicians, that are able to get away
with things, that my male counterparts could not. Their knowledge level was poor at best, but
once hired the upper management was scared to fire them, due to a lawsuit. It was not
fair to the other technicians, that were expected to fix issues in the Technical Field. If they
want to be employed in the Technical Field, then they should have to study just as hard
as the male counterparts, and perform just as good as them as well.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Tuesday session on a lower note after generally upbeat earnings took the back seat to geopolitical concerns. The S&P 500 (-0.5%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.1%) ended on their lows, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) displayed relative strength.
Once again, market participants were focused on quarterly reports in the early going, but geopolitical worries overshadowed the impact of mostly better than expected earnings. Specifically, equities ... More
More Market News
After enjoying a smooth rise in stock prices since May, investors are about to be hit with another bout of volatility.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'