New child labor figures: 168 million working
While the numbers are down, the 85 million who work the most dangerous jobs outnumber the entire US population of children.
That's about as cheery as this story gets, and even that information is fairly bleak.
According to the International Labour Office, that pool of 168 million child workers ages 5 through 17 is larger than all but seven nations on the globe. It's bigger than the populations of Bangladesh (152.5 million), Russia (143.5 million), Japan (127.3 million) and Mexico (118.4 million). It's more than double the size of Germany (80.5 million) and nearly the size of France (66 million), the U.K. (63.7 million) and Spain (46.7 million) combined.
Oh, and those 85 million kids working nights and long hours, laboring underground or underwater and being subject to physical, psychological and/or sexual abuse? That's 11 million more children than the U.S. has. It's also not counting the absolute worst forms of child labor -- the forced prostitution and paramilitary service fueled by human trafficking -- because nations don't tend to freely offer accurate numbers on those kinds of transgressions, and many of those children are usually part of the hazardous labor pool anyway.
In case you're curious about the latter, though, the ILO estimated last year about 5.5 million children aged 17 years and younger are being forced into labor. That's roughly a quarter of the 20.9 million people forced to work around the world. That also includes those forced into sexual exploitation (960,000 children), for labor exploitation (3,780,000) and by the state (709,000).
A full 73 million child laborers, or 44% of the total, are children between the ages of 5 and 11. Roughly 59% of them work in agriculture, many on small family farms. But others play a large role in the livestock and fishing industries.
An additional 54 million work in the service industry, with 11.5 million employed as domestic workers and the rest taking unpaid work at hotels and restaurants, manning stands, carts or corners as street sellers or supplementing work in auto repair shops or even transporting customers themselves.
Unpaid family workers account for more than two-thirds of child laborers (68%), followed by paid employment (23%) and the self-employed (8%).
And many of these children do the most dangerous work: at heights or in confined spaces; using dangerous machinery, equipment and tools; manually handling or transporting heavy loads; and working in environments filled with hazardous substances, temperatures, noise levels or even long, painful stretches of fast-paced work. Some 55% of those burdens is carried by children 15 to 17 years old, 81% of whom are boys. Children ages 5-11 still make up 22% of this labor pool, with girls taking 58% of those jobs mostly in domestic work.
The situation looks most acute in Asia, where nearly 78 million children are involved and a full 34 million work in the most hazardous jobs. However, that's 9.3% and 4.1% of Asia's child population, respectively. In sub-Saharan Africa, the 59 million child laborers make up more than 21% of all children. The 29 million children doing hazardous work in that region account for one in 10 of that area's kids.
It's not much prettier in Latin America and the Caribbean, which have 12.5 million child laborers, but a whopping 9.6 million (or 7% of all children) are placed directly in harm's way.
That those numbers are shrinking is great, but they're falling woefully short of the ILO's goal of eliminating dangerous child labor by 2016. Good news is lovely and all, but unrealistic expectations and the lack of financial and political will to get rid of child workers isn't doing much to help the laborers themselves.
Why do they include numbers all the way to 17? I started working at 14. There is nothing wrong with that.
Children working on farms is a right of passage to that lifestyle and teaches them good work ethic.
Having said all that, anybody that puts a young child in a factory or other hazardous job involving machines or hazardous chemicals or waste should be drug behind a truck through a briar patch.
American companies say tsk-tsk and try to assure everyone they are not part of this third world use of children. The fact is they run their corporate business through so many umbrella companies they have no idea who is doing what. There's hardly ever a direct tie in to the last company in line who commits the crime.
We know the caste system is alive and well in many Middle East and Asian countries but pretend it isn't. If we admitted it we would have no justification for sending them billions in assistance every year. Companies that outsource to these foreign countries know the only way they are getting the production for pennies on the dollar is through slave labor. It's okay to turn a blind eye as long as the share holders are happy and the guys at the top get their million dollar pay checks.
If Americans were willing to pay an extra nickel for a T-shirt, the jobs could be kept at home employing millions more Americans. They tell us they are removing labels from certain garments for ascetic and style reasons when, in fact, it is to save half a penny on the cost of producing the label and the ten year old who previously supported his parents by sewing the label on.
When the corporate brass do their all expense paid fact finding trips to the factories, do they even bother to get out of the limo to see what's going on inside. The sure don't do any unexpected tours because that wouldn't allow enough time to set up a dummy showplace factory. If people actually started refusing to buy items not 'Made In America' our economy would blossom.
15 to 17? In many cultures that's an adult; they even marry. The idea that they are children, and below the age of consent, is a cultural matter, and not all societies share that value. There is absolutely nothing wrong in their cultures with these people entering the adult work force. They should not be counted.
Children working in family businesses? That used to be the American way. It still should be. That's why they have summers off from school, because traditionally they needed to be home to help their parents work the family farm. The loss of this culture of being taught the value of hard work at an early age has had a devastating effect on our society. Our children grow up to be spoiled brats, all too often, never learning the value of a dollar.
I worked in the West Texas cotton fields 10 hours a day, 50 hours a week, starting when I was 10 years. I did not view it as a problem but as an opportunity to buy my school clothes for the coming school year. I think kids would learn the value of money if they had to work for it
They use the word child laborers. We in fact they should call it child slavery.
I find it fascinating that most are down-playing the actual message of the article by stating that, they too, worked at the ages of 15 to 17 and that those ages should not be counted....
Are you people actually that dense??????????
The point is that these kids are being put to work, no, being forced into some form of sweatshop or other means of slave labor. These kids are not working on a family farm, and nowhere in the report is the statistic of kids being "married off" at a young age, that was not even factored into the "labor" statistics. That's great and all that we were all working at young ages but what is wrong with you people most of these kids they speak of, by the time they are 15-17, have seen far more "work" and shared far more traumatic experience than we will see in an entire lifetime from this slave labor regimen. Not to mention, when you kids were working on the farm or in a grocery store or whatever, you were getting paid were you not? THESE KIDS AREN'T, HAVE SOME RESPECT, I don't give a crippled crab's crutch how you denigrate the message by selfishly including your own mediocre work history, as Americans, 99% of us were playing video games, watching cartoons, and eating cereal at 5 years old, NOT holding an AK-47, getting traded off into sex slavery, or being put to work in a diamond mine, I mean geez, I think downplaying the woes of the world, with our own pathetic half-**** sob stories that pale in comparison, that has become the American Way....
*single tear rolls down cheek
I would be interested in seeing the numbers for kids under 14. I see nothing wrong with kids having responsibilities of working to earn the things they want. I do not, however, condone long hours and hazardous work. America's children are rapidly becoming a generation of lazy and irresponsible moochers. I always asked my mom, when I was a kid, why do the people in starving countries continue to have babies and watch them die. She said it was against their religion to use birth control.... well it is against my religion to watch my child starve to death.......or be worked to death.
There were 215 million working in 2008, now it is down to 168 million.
In just 5 years time there are now 37 million unemployed kids.
It must be rough on them and their families to be trying to survive without that income.
shame, isn't it.
Think about this, another article is espousing that "children" don't "mature" until age 25! We wonder why it is that people come here from other countries and are able to do so well, while people that were born here end up on welfare living in trailer parks.
We're becoming softer, lazier, and dumber, with each passing generation.
40 years ago the world had a fraction of today's population, and 40 years ago we didn't have video access to what was occurring in the most remote corners of the world, let alone reliable information about anything.
Real progress starts with ourselves, then our family, then our community, state, country et cetera. And all should use that as an example and stop waiting for someone else to take care of the mess you made, or hand feed you when you yourself is perfectly capable of taking care of yourself. Thinking too big creates impractical expectations, and we eventually give up and blame everyone else but ourselves.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages began the new trading week on a slightly lower note with small caps leading the weakness. The Russell 2000 shed 0.3% while the S&P 500 slipped less than a point with six sectors ending in the red.
Equity indices began the day in negative territory with only the Nasdaq (-0.04%) making a very brief appearance in the green. After sliding through the first hour of action, the major averages reversed and spent the remainder of the session climbing off ... More
More Market News
Like many companies this winter, the fast-food giant blamed a drop in same-store sales on the weather. But could its problems be bigger than a snowbank?
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'