'Sunshine Act' is making doctors nervous
The new law requires pharmaceutical companies to publicly disclose dollars they've given to physicians.
A new law that requires Big Pharma to report most of the payments and gifts they give to doctors and teaching hospitals is apparently making a lot of doctors very nervous about coming under greater public scrutiny.
The so-called Physican Payments Sunshine Act went into effect earlier this month, and it applies to the manufacturers of pharmaceuticals, medical devices and biologicals that take part in federal health care programs. As The Wall Street Journal reports, that information will be posted on a publicly accessible website beginning in September 2014.
The drug industry has come under criticism for some time for the hundreds of millions of dollars it hands out annually to doctors in the form of gifts and fees. According to The Journal, drug giant Pfizer (PFE) paid out $173.2 million to U.S. health care professionals last year.
A lot of that funding comes in the form of consulting and speaking fees, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars at a time. But some physicians say the new disclosure regulations are making them review their relationships with the pharmaceutical industry.
"I'll continue to weigh the benefits and the negatives, and I think the Sunshine Act and the public reporting of all this stuff makes us think about that," John Mandrola, a Louisville, Ky.-based cardiologist, told The Journal. "And I think that's a good thing."
Dr. Mandrola said he has been paid around $2,000 this year by medical device makers to speak at some engagements. But he has also become more cautious about accepting such fees, and told newspaper that he now "avoids industry reps visiting his office, believing he can get information on new drugs elsewhere."
The one major exception to the new law is payments or other compensation made by businesses to doctors speaking at some accredited, continuing medical education events, but only if the sponsoring corporation doesn't select or directly pay the event's speaker.
The AMA also says doctors have the right to review these new disclosure reports and to challenge what they consider false, inaccurate or misleading data. Some industry critics, however, hope the new regulations will force physicians to think twice about the sometimes too-comfortable relationships many have with pharmaceutical and other companies.
"The idea is that transparency will encourage doctors to evaluate whether these are appropriate relationships with companies or not," Daniel Carlat, a psychiatrist and director of the prescription project at the Pew Charitable Trusts, told The Journal.
Dollars given to Doctors being disclosed makes them nervous and feel disgraced? They sure have a different mindset than our politicians!
I have walked away from physicians who seemed intent on pushing drugs that had little or no justification in my life. They got those samples from the pharmas pushing them at dinners and other events these docs get as perks. We are the most medicated nation on earth. This is why.
Of all the screwed up things in our "patient centered" healthcare system (BS unless the patient is a $100 bill), the relationship between drug companies, doctors, and the public is one of the most screwed up. From the pharmaceutical commercials advising patients to "tell your doctor..." (aren't they the one's with the medical degrees? shouldn't they be advising me what drugs are safe and effective?) to doctor kickbacks from pharma corporations that lead the prescription of drugs that might not be either affordable or the most effective. While I doubt that disclosing the seedy dealings of our professional pushers...ahem, I mean "doctors"...will change the way they operate, at least it will make it transparent enough to get laws passed that actually will do something.
Time for a Medical disclaimer:
This may cause you to become irritable or short-tempered.
Some discomfort maybe experienced, if you feel uncomfortable is it because you should be.
If you have thoughts of suicide you may want to call your lawyer and have your will checked first.
Some instances of full disclosure will be seen and YOU are responsible. No one else.
Your patients will receive some comfort from the fact that you are experiencing difficulties from Big Pharma.
You may have thoughts of leaving the country.
Do be afraid to stop taking payola.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages began the new trading week on a slightly lower note with small caps leading the weakness. The Russell 2000 shed 0.3% while the S&P 500 slipped less than a point with six sectors ending in the red.
Equity indices began the day in negative territory with only the Nasdaq (-0.04%) making a very brief appearance in the green. After sliding through the first hour of action, the major averages reversed and spent the remainder of the session climbing off ... More
More Market News
Like many companies this winter, the fast-food giant blamed a drop in same-store sales on the weather. But could its problems be bigger than a snowbank?
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'