NJ officals caught lying to get free school lunches
Dozens of school district employees, including elected board members, omitted large chunks of their incomes so that their children could qualify.
An investigation by State Comptroller Matthew Boxer found that the elected school board members from Newark, Pleasantville and Patterson, along with 40 school district employees, submitted false information on applications for the free lunch program. They all now may face criminal prosecutions.
In one particularly galling case, a board member in Pleasantville, which is near Atlantic City, omitted about $59,000 in household income from her application in each of the three years investigators reviewed. She didn't seem to think she had done anything wrong.
She told investigators that she excluded her own income on the application "because she
herself was not the person receiving the free student lunch," Boxer's office says in a press release.
It gets better.
The board member, who unfortunately is not named, went on to say that her income is none of the school district's "damn business." The state comptroller's office contacted the state's tax division because she apparently didn't think she needed to file her taxes either. The IRS will no doubt want to chat with her as well.
Investigators went after many other public officials who weren't employed by school districts as well. One, a supervisor for an unnamed state agency, said she "forgot" to report $97,500 in earnings from her husband earned as part of her household income.
And sometimes, even the school districts are to blame. The Patterson School District allowed the children of a school nurse into the program even after she submitted pay stubs proving she didn't qualify. She told state officials that she thought the district "was extending her a courtesy because she is an employee there."
Speaking to reporters, Gov. Chris Christie, who is up for reelection this year, called the practice "absurd and obscene."
What's even sadder is that the lax oversight uncovered in New Jersey is probably not unique.
The program is structured by the federal government so "that the vast majority of free lunch applications are never reviewed for accuracy," according to the comptroller's office.
That's truly frightening.
--Jonathan Berr lives in New Jersey, where men are men and taxes are outrageous. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
I'm willing to bet my firstborn child that if anyone traced where all the federal money goes you would uncover millions of people sucking from the taxpayers tit.
That's why no one in government has any intention of doing any auditing. The fleecing of taxpayers will continue until the tit dries up.
Meanwhile, Congressmen are giving themselves annual raises and more benefits to congratulate themselves on a job well done.
EVERY FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM IS STRUCTURED LIKE THAT!!!!!!!!!
Sad to think that half of you idiots still believe more government is the answer.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.