Starbucks didn't ban guns, but these places did
Peet's, Whole Foods and Disney theme parks are among the many that strictly prohibit customers from carrying weapons on premises.
If you did, you heard wrong. All Starbucks chief executive Howard Schultz did was politely ask customers not to bring loaded firearms into his stores or hold gun rallies or protests there.
No ban is in effect, and Schultz says employees won't confront customers who don't wish to comply with his request. Some of his exact words follow:
"Few topics in America generate a more polarized and emotional debate than guns. In recent months, Starbucks stores and our partners (employees) who work in our stores have been thrust unwillingly into the middle of this debate. That's why I am writing today with a respectful request that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas."
Schultz is still taking heat for the request, which is odd considering the number of companies that actually ban guns in their stores outright. The Huffington Post ran a list of eight of them, and right at the top is organic grocer Whole Foods Market (WFM), which has banned guns in its stores since 2001.
Typical of some lefty, holier-than-thou fancypants, "Whole Paycheck" boutique market, right? Well, only if you ignore the fact that Whole Foods chief executive John Mackey is ordinarily a staunch libertarian who has pushed back on labor issues and called the Obamacare health care law "fascist."
Even one of Starbucks' direct competitors has a tougher stance on guns than its giant foe with 12,000 U.S. stores. Peet's Coffee (PEET), which gave Starbucks' founders their first beans, doesn't allow guns in its stores or in its outside seating areas.
California Pizza Kitchen (CPK) won't allow guns in its restaurants either, while growing beer, chicken and big-screen-TV casual-dining chain Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) has banned firearms in its establishments since 2009. If you're taking the kids to either Toys R Us or Walt Disney World or Disneyland (DIS), those establishments don't want your weapons on their grounds, either.
By those terms, Schultz and Starbucks are being comparably lenient in giving "responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request." Schultz notes that Starbucks has always worked in accordance with local law when allowing customers to openly carry firearms into its stores.
But recent events against Starbucks forced Schultz to reconsider. Among them were anti-gun petitions and protests -- and a pro-gun "Starbucks Appreciation Day" in the Newtown, Conn., town where an elementary school shooting in December that left 20 children dead, but was thwarted when employees closed the store for the day. Said Schultz:
"We've seen the 'open carry' debate become increasingly uncivil and, in some cases, even threatening. Pro-gun activists have used our stores as a political stage for media events misleadingly called 'Starbucks Appreciation Days' that disingenuously portray Starbucks as a champion of 'open carry.' To be clear: we do not want these events in our stores. Some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction, including soliciting and confronting our customers and partners."
In short, people brought this response on themselves and have continued to draw the company's ire by lambasting the nonbinding decision from both sides of the argument. Starbucks doesn't want its stores used as political pawns and, in a deviation from modern discourse, asked people to politely listen to reason.
When other businesses have abandoned that approach in favor of straight-up bans, it's difficult to sympathize with Starbucks' newly frothy coffeehouse critics.
I find no issue with a private company asking people not to bring firearms into there establishment. Card carrying NRA members will all comply to such a request.
Unfortunately, the people you need to worry about will ignore your request.
Good Lord people are such idiots. 99% of people (including me) who carry concealed pay no attention to the silly no firearms signs at all. And people dont have a clue we are armed :)
People wonder why someone would want to carry a gun into these places to begin with. The reason is because they have their gun on them all the time. They don't take it off unless they have to. Sure they could leave it in their vehicle but vehicles get broken into. It's like a cell phone. It's not necessary to get your coffee but why leave it in your vehicle when you already have it on you. Just like a gun, if you don't pull it out and show it to everyone then nobody will even know you have it.
I don't want to hear that its completely different because one is a communications device and the other is a bringer of death. That wasn't the point of the comparison.
If SOMEONE would have had a "legal" carry gun in the Navy Yard last week, maybe so many people would not have died. And yes, the guards had them, they were the first ones targeted. If you outlaw guns....only outlaws will have guns. Trite saying...but THEY don't care if they break the law. Get it? Geez. Probably not some of you....if there's a law...no one will break it right? If we melt down all those nasty ol' guns....no one will know how to make one right? No one will find a way right? Tsk tsk. Stupid stupid. Case: Chicago. 13 people shot. Wait, dont they have some of the STRICTEST gun laws in the nation??? Hmm....guess those nasty old criminals just didn't know.
This card carrying NRA member will NOT abide by their request. If the law says I can carry, then I will do so. I will not go into a place anymore that bans guns. They are the targets. I have a right to protect myself against these ultra violence thugs and will do so.
Love starbucks. and this will not stop me going thru the drivethru. I appreciate their position and the polite way they are asking.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The good news: Bad weather means fewer drivers on the road, and they're going slower than usual. The bad news: It's still dangerous.
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
- Try this instead of raising the minimum wage
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
[BRIEFING.COM] There wasn't a lot of excitement in the stock market today and there is nothing wrong with that. After rallying in broad-based fashion on Friday, the major indices stood their ground (for the most part) amid a lack of conviction from buyers and sellers alike.
Today wasn't a case so much of the stock market going up as it was a case of some influential stocks going up to keep the major indices on a winning path. In fact, decliners were just about even with ... More
More Market News
The photo-sharing site only has 10 employees, and it may be up for grabs.